Suppr超能文献

仿制品和原品牌旋转器械的运动学对循环疲劳阻力的影响。

Influence of Kinematics on the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Replicalike and Original Brand Rotary Instruments.

机构信息

Unidade de Investigação em Ciências Orais e Biomédicas, Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; Centro de Estudo de Medicina Dentária Baseada na Evidência, Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; Instituto de Implantologia, Lisboa, Portugal.

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Grande Rio University, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Endodontics, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

J Endod. 2020 Aug;46(8):1136-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 replicalike rotary instruments compared with their original brand systems using continuous rotation and optimum torque reverse (OTR) kinematics.

METHODS

New F1 rotary instruments (n = 20 per group) from ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Maillefer) original brand systems were compared with 3 replicalike instruments (U-File [Dentmark, Ludhiana, India], Super Files [Shenzhen Flydent Medical, Shenzhen, China], and Super Files Blue [Shenzhen Flydent Medical]) regarding cyclic fatigue resistance. In each group, the selected instruments were randomly distributed into 2 subgroups (n = 10) according to the kinematics. In the rotary group (ROT), the instruments were activated with a continuous clockwise rotation (300 rpm, 1.5 Ncm), whereas in the OTR group, asymmetric oscillatory motion was performed setting the OTR function at 300 rpm and adjusting the torque limit at the minimum level using the TriAuto ZX2 motor (J Morita, Kyoto, Japan). The time to fracture was recorded and statistically compared according to the kinematics (ROT × OTR) and the instrument type (replicalike × original brand) using the independent sample t test (α = 0.05). Additionally, the metal alloy characterization of each system was performed by differential scanning calorimetry and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed significantly higher time to fracture for all rotary systems tested in OTR motion compared with continuous rotation (P < .05) with a mean percentage increase ranging from 52.1% (ProTaper Gold) to 156.7% (U-File). The replicalike instruments showed a significantly higher time to fracture compared with the respective original brand instruments in either ROT or OTR motion (P < .05). Replicas presented austenitic temperatures above the ones displayed by the original brands and an almost equiatomic ratio between nickel and titanium elements.

CONCLUSIONS

OTR motion significantly improved the fatigue resistance of both original and replicalike systems. The replicas showed higher cyclic fatigue resistance than original brand instruments and higher transition temperatures to the austenitic phase.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估 3 种类似复制的旋转器械在连续旋转和最佳扭矩反转 (OTR) 运动学下的循环疲劳阻力,与它们的原始品牌系统进行比较。

方法

使用 ProTaper Universal(登士柏麦尔乐,Ballaigues,瑞士)和 ProTaper Gold(登士柏麦尔乐)原始品牌系统的新型 F1 旋转器械(每组 20 个)与 3 种类似复制器械(U-File [登士柏美莱福,印度 Ludhiana]、Super Files [深圳菲登特医疗,深圳]和 Super Files Blue [深圳菲登特医疗])进行比较,评估其循环疲劳阻力。在每个组中,根据运动学将所选器械随机分为 2 个子组(每组 10 个)。在旋转组(ROT)中,器械以顺时针连续旋转(300 rpm,1.5 Ncm)的方式激活,而在 OTR 组中,通过将 OTR 功能设置为 300 rpm 并使用 TriAuto ZX2 电机(J Morita,京都,日本)将扭矩限制调节到最低水平来进行非对称振动运动。根据运动学(ROT×OTR)和器械类型(复制相似×原始品牌)记录并比较断裂时间,并使用独立样本 t 检验(α=0.05)进行统计比较。此外,通过差示扫描量热法和能量色散 X 射线光谱对每个系统的金属合金特性进行了表征。

结果

统计分析显示,与连续旋转相比,所有经测试的旋转系统在 OTR 运动中的断裂时间显著延长(P<0.05),平均百分比增加范围为 52.1%(ProTaper Gold)至 156.7%(U-File)。与连续旋转或 OTR 运动中的各自原始品牌器械相比,复制器械的断裂时间显著延长(P<0.05)。复制器械显示出比原始品牌更高的奥氏体温度,并且镍和钛元素之间几乎呈等原子比。

结论

OTR 运动显著提高了原始和复制系统的疲劳阻力。复制器械显示出比原始品牌器械更高的循环疲劳阻力和更高的向奥氏体相转变温度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验