Martins Jorge N R, Silva Emmanuel J N L, Marques Duarte, Versiani Marco A
Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, 1600-277 Lisboa, Portugal.
LIBPhys-FCT UID/FIS/04559/2013, 1600-277 Lisboa, Portugal.
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;12(10):317. doi: 10.3390/dj12100317.
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the cyclic fatigue strength of clockwise cutting rotary endodontic instruments when subjected to two different kinematics: continuous clockwise rotation and clockwise reciprocation movement under optimum torque reverse (OTR) motion. New ProTaper Next X1 (n = 20) and X2 (n = 20) instruments were randomly divided into two subgroups (n = 10) based on kinematics (continuous rotation or OTR). The specimens were tested using a custom-made device with a non-tapered stainless-steel artificial canal measuring 19 mm in length, featuring a 6 mm radius and an 86-degree curvature. All instruments were tested with a lubricant at room temperature until a fracture occurred. The time to fracture and the length of the separated fragment were recorded. Subsequently, the fractured instruments were inspected under a scanning electron microscope for signs of cyclic fatigue failure, plastic deformation, and/or crack propagation. The subgroup comparisons for time to fracture and instrument length were performed using the independent samples -test, with the level of statistical significance set at 0.05. When using OTR movement, the ProTaper Next X1 increased the time to fracture from 52.9 to 125.8 s ( < 0.001), while the ProTaper Next X2 increased from 45.4 to 66.0 s ( < 0.001). No subgroup exhibited plastic deformations, but both showed dimpling marks indicative of cyclic fatigue as the primary mode of failure. Additionally, OTR movement resulted in more metal alloy microcracks. The use of OTR motion extended the lifespan of the tested instruments and resulted in a higher number of metal microcracks. This suggests that OTR motion helped to distribute the mechanical stress more evenly across the instrument, thereby relieving localized tension. As a result, it delayed the formation of a single catastrophic crack, enhancing the overall performance of the instruments during the experimental procedures.
连续顺时针旋转和在最佳扭矩反转(OTR)运动下的顺时针往复运动。将新的ProTaper Next X1(n = 20)和X2(n = 20)器械根据运动方式(连续旋转或OTR)随机分为两个亚组(n = 10)。使用定制装置对样本进行测试,该装置有一条长度为19 mm的非锥形不锈钢人工根管,半径为6 mm,曲率为86度。所有器械在室温下使用润滑剂进行测试,直至发生断裂。记录断裂时间和分离碎片的长度。随后,在扫描电子显微镜下检查断裂的器械,以寻找循环疲劳失效、塑性变形和/或裂纹扩展的迹象。使用独立样本t检验对断裂时间和器械长度进行亚组比较,统计学显著性水平设定为0.05。当使用OTR运动时,ProTaper Next X1的断裂时间从52.9秒增加到125.8秒(P < 0.001),而ProTaper Next X2从45.4秒增加到66.0秒(P < 0.001)。没有亚组出现塑性变形,但两者都显示出凹痕,表明循环疲劳是主要的失效模式。此外,OTR运动导致更多的金属合金微裂纹。使用OTR运动延长了受试器械的使用寿命,并导致更多的金属微裂纹。这表明OTR运动有助于更均匀地在器械上分布机械应力,从而缓解局部张力。结果,它延迟了单一灾难性裂纹的形成,提高了器械在实验过程中的整体性能。