Helbig Ingo, Ellis Colin A
Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; The Epilepsy NeuroGenetics Initiative (ENGIN), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA; Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics (DBHi), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
The Epilepsy NeuroGenetics Initiative (ENGIN), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA; Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics (DBHi), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Neuropharmacology. 2020 Aug 1;172:107970. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.107970. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
Identifying the optimal treatment based on specific characteristics of each patient is the main promise of precision medicine. In the field of epilepsy, the identification of more than 100 causative genes provides the enticing possibility of treatments targeted to specific disease etiologies. These conditions include classical examples, such as the use of vitamin B6 in antiquitin deficiency or the ketogenic diet in GLUT1 deficiency, where the disease mechanism can be directly addressed by the selection of a specific therapeutic compound. For epilepsies caused by channelopathies there have been advances in understanding how the selection of existing medications can be targeted to the functional consequences of genetic alterations. We discuss the examples of the use of sodium channel blockers such as phenytoin and oxcarbazepine in the sodium channelopathies, quinidine in KCNT1-related epilepsies, and strategies in GRIN-related epilepsies as examples of epilepsy precision medicine. Assessing the clinical response to targeted treatments of these conditions has been complicated by genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, as well as by various neurological and non-neurological comorbidities. Moving forward, the development of standardized outcome measures will be critical to successful precision medicine trials in complex and heterogeneous disorders like the epilepsies. Finally, we address new frontiers in epilepsy precision medicine, including the need to match the growing volume of genetic data with high-throughput functional assays to assess the functional consequences of genetic variants and the ability to extract clinical data at large scale from electronic medical records and apply quantitative methods based on standardized phenotyping language.
根据每位患者的特定特征确定最佳治疗方案是精准医学的主要目标。在癫痫领域,100多种致病基因的鉴定为针对特定疾病病因的治疗提供了诱人的可能性。这些情况包括经典案例,如在抗喹啉缺乏症中使用维生素B6或在葡萄糖转运蛋白1缺乏症中采用生酮饮食,在这些案例中,通过选择特定的治疗化合物可以直接解决疾病机制问题。对于由离子通道病引起的癫痫,在理解如何根据基因改变的功能后果来选择现有药物方面已经取得了进展。我们讨论了在离子通道病中使用苯妥英钠和奥卡西平之类的钠通道阻滞剂、在与KCNT1相关的癫痫中使用奎尼丁以及在与GRIN相关的癫痫中采取的策略等精准医学癫痫治疗的例子。评估这些疾病靶向治疗的临床反应因基因和表型异质性以及各种神经和非神经合并症而变得复杂。展望未来,制定标准化的疗效评估指标对于像癫痫这种复杂和异质性疾病的精准医学试验取得成功至关重要。最后,我们探讨了癫痫精准医学的新前沿,包括需要将不断增加的基因数据与高通量功能测定相匹配,以评估基因变异的功能后果,以及从电子病历中大规模提取临床数据并应用基于标准化表型语言的定量方法的能力。