Forensic Science Program, School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand; Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Private Bag 92021, Auckland, New Zealand.
Forensic Science Program, School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand; Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Private Bag 92021, Auckland, New Zealand.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 Jul;47:102278. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102278. Epub 2020 May 1.
Massively parallel sequencing is rapidly emerging as a valuable tool in forensic DNA analyses. As part of our validation of this technology, we established its compatibility with a laser microdissection cell collection method including a one-tube DNA extraction process. We also used the laser microdissector to explore the number of cells required to generate informative DNA sequence profiles and establish the limitations of the technology. Using the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit (Primer Mix B) and a MiSeq FGx™ sequencer, we successfully demonstrated the compatibility of MPS with a laser microdissection one-tube extraction method, with minor alterations made to the manufacturer's recommended library preparation protocol, including the addition of magnesium chloride to counteract the effect of dithiothreitol on amplification efficacy. This work highlighted several quality issues that may be encountered when preparing sequencing libraries from low quantity DNA samples, particularly that libraries prepared from low cell numbers showed high levels of adapter dimer compared to those prepared from more cells. To remediate this, we replaced the bead normalisation step with a qPCR normalisation method, whereby sequencing libraries are diluted based on their molarity as determined after library purification. The work presented here focuses on the results from the autosomal and Y STR markers as these could be directly compared to results obtained from traditional capillary electrophoresis techniques. Full autosomal STR DNA sequence profiles (27 loci) could be obtained from 50 epithelial cells and 100 spermatozoa (sperm cells). The limit of detection for the ForenSeq™ system was determined to be 25 epithelial and 25 sperm cells for both autosomal and Y STRs. Cells were dissected from both single source samples and mixtures of semen and saliva. There was no apparent difference in sensitivity, presence of contamination or PCR artefacts between libraries prepared from single source samples and libraries prepared from mixed source samples.
高通量测序技术在法医 DNA 分析中迅速成为一种有价值的工具。作为对这项技术验证的一部分,我们确定了它与激光微切割细胞收集方法的兼容性,包括一个单管 DNA 提取过程。我们还使用激光微切割器来探索生成信息丰富的 DNA 序列图谱所需的细胞数量,并确定该技术的局限性。使用 ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit(引物混合物 B)和 MiSeq FGx™ 测序仪,我们成功地证明了 MPS 与激光微切割单管提取方法的兼容性,对制造商推荐的文库制备方案进行了一些微小的改动,包括添加氯化镁来抵消二硫苏糖醇对扩增效率的影响。这项工作突出了在从低数量 DNA 样本制备测序文库时可能遇到的几个质量问题,特别是从低细胞数量制备的文库与从更多细胞制备的文库相比,适配器二聚体水平较高。为了解决这个问题,我们用 qPCR 归一化方法代替了珠子归一化步骤,即根据文库纯化后确定的摩尔浓度来稀释测序文库。本文重点介绍了常染色体和 Y STR 标记的结果,因为这些结果可以直接与传统毛细管电泳技术获得的结果进行比较。可以从 50 个上皮细胞和 100 个精子(精子细胞)中获得完整的常染色体 STR DNA 序列图谱(27 个位点)。ForenSeq™ 系统的检测限确定为 25 个上皮细胞和 25 个常染色体和 Y STR 的精子细胞。细胞取自单一来源样本和精液与唾液混合物的样本。从单一来源样本和混合来源样本制备的文库之间,在灵敏度、污染存在或 PCR 伪影方面没有明显差异。