• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区分狼与人类和其他捕食者在小型猎物组合上的埋藏学特征。

Distinguishing the taphonomic signature of wolves from humans and other predators on small prey assemblages.

机构信息

SERP. Departament d'Història i Arqueologia. Universitat de Barcelona. C/Montalegre 6-8, E-08001, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 May 15;10(1):8030. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64716-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-64716-8
PMID:32415219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7229169/
Abstract

The study of human subsistence strategies in prehistoric hunter-gatherer communities is essential to understanding the evolution of human behaviour. An important topic of interest is the expansion of dietary breadth, resulting in the procurement of a larger number of small game species. However, to make accurate interpretations of human subsistence, the correct identification of the agents responsible for archaeofaunal assemblages is crucial, and actualistic studies that establish the taphonomic signature of the different predators are indispensable. Despite being one of the most ubiquitous carnivores in prehistoric archaeological sites, the role of wolves (Canis lupus) as agents responsible for small-prey accumulations has never been examined. The aims of this study are to analyse the taphonomic patterns left by wolves on rabbit remains and to put forward a series of criteria that can help distinguish assemblages produced by this carnivore from those accumulated by people or by other predators. Our results reveal that wolves ingest and consume the whole rabbit carcass, with the consequence that all rabbit remains accumulated by wolves come from the scats. The referential framework provided in this study will make it possible to discriminate wolves as agents of fossil rabbit accumulations.

摘要

研究史前狩猎采集社区人类生存策略对于理解人类行为的演变至关重要。一个备受关注的重要话题是饮食广度的扩大,导致更多的小型猎物被获取。然而,要准确解释人类的生存方式,正确识别负责考古动物群组合的代理至关重要,并且需要进行实际研究来确定不同捕食者的埋藏学特征。尽管狼(Canis lupus)是史前考古遗址中最普遍的肉食动物之一,但作为负责小型猎物积累的代理,它们的作用从未被研究过。本研究的目的是分析狼在兔遗骸上留下的埋藏学模式,并提出一系列标准,以帮助区分由这种肉食动物产生的组合与由人类或其他捕食者积累的组合。我们的研究结果表明,狼会吞食和消耗整只兔尸,因此所有由狼积累的兔遗骸都来自于它们的粪便。本研究提供的参考框架将使我们能够区分狼作为化石兔积累的代理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7229169/2a51505520a1/41598_2020_64716_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7229169/98af149dfe25/41598_2020_64716_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7229169/e150631e8408/41598_2020_64716_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7229169/2a51505520a1/41598_2020_64716_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7229169/98af149dfe25/41598_2020_64716_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7229169/e150631e8408/41598_2020_64716_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afa/7229169/2a51505520a1/41598_2020_64716_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Distinguishing the taphonomic signature of wolves from humans and other predators on small prey assemblages.区分狼与人类和其他捕食者在小型猎物组合上的埋藏学特征。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 15;10(1):8030. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64716-8.
2
Multi-trophic resource selection function enlightens the behavioural game between wolves and their prey.多营养级资源选择函数揭示了狼与其猎物之间的行为博弈。
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Sep;82(5):1062-71. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12093. Epub 2013 May 23.
3
Lions as Bone Accumulators? Paleontological and Ecological Implications of a Modern Bone Assemblage from Olduvai Gorge.狮子是骨骼积累者?来自奥杜威峡谷的现代骨骼组合的古生物学和生态学意义
PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0153797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153797. eCollection 2016.
4
The "bear" essentials: actualistic research on Ursus arctos arctos in the Spanish Pyrenees and its implications for paleontology and archaeology.“熊”的基本要素:对西班牙比利牛斯山脉棕熊的实证研究及其对古生物学和考古学的启示。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e102457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102457. eCollection 2014.
5
Snow Leopard and Himalayan Wolf: Food Habits and Prey Selection in the Central Himalayas, Nepal.雪豹与喜马拉雅狼:尼泊尔中部喜马拉雅地区的食性与猎物选择
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 8;12(2):e0170549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170549. eCollection 2017.
6
Spatial patterning of the archaeological and paleontological assemblage at Dmanisi, Georgia: An analysis of site formation and carnivore-hominin interaction in Block 2.格鲁吉亚德马尼西考古和古生物组合的空间模式:2 号区遗址形成和食肉动物-人类相互作用的分析。
J Hum Evol. 2020 Jun;143:102773. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102773. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
Body size and predatory performance in wolves: is bigger better?狼的体型与捕食能力:体型越大越好吗?
J Anim Ecol. 2009 May;78(3):532-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01517.x. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
8
Seasonal patterns of predation for gray wolves in the multi-prey system of Yellowstone National Park.黄石国家公园多猎物系统中灰狼的捕食季节性模式。
J Anim Ecol. 2012 May;81(3):553-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01945.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
9
Cross-continental differences in patterns of predation: will naive moose in Scandinavia ever learn?捕食模式的跨大陆差异:斯堪的纳维亚半岛天真的驼鹿会学会吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jun 7;273(1592):1421-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3447.
10
To Eat or Not To Eat? The Diet of the Endangered Iberian Wolf (Canis lupus signatus) in a Human-Dominated Landscape in Central Portugal.吃还是不吃?葡萄牙中部人类主导景观中濒危伊比利亚狼(Canis lupus signatus)的饮食
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0129379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129379. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Quaternary taphonomy: understanding the past through traces.第四纪埋藏学:通过痕迹了解过去。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 4;12(1):7112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10473-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Hominin and animal activities in the microstratigraphic record from Denisova Cave (Altai Mountains, Russia).丹尼索瓦洞(俄罗斯阿尔泰山脉)微地层记录中的古人类和动物活动。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 26;9(1):13785. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49930-3.
2
New evidence of broader diets for archaic populations in the northwestern Mediterranean.西北地中海地区古代人群更广泛的饮食新证据。
Sci Adv. 2019 Mar 6;5(3):eaav9106. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav9106. eCollection 2019 Mar.