• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国性食管穿孔调查:日本食管学会认定机构的病例研究。

A national survey on esophageal perforation: study of cases at accredited institutions by the Japanese Esophagus Society.

机构信息

Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.

Division of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Esophagus. 2020 Jul;17(3):230-238. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00744-7. Epub 2020 May 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10388-020-00744-7
PMID:32415409
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To get a clear view of the current state of treatment for esophageal perforation in Japan. Esophagus perforations are the most serious gastrointestinal tract perforations and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The optimal treatment choice remains unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective clinical review of 182 esophageal perforation cases at 108 hospitals accredited by the Japanese Esophageal Society between January 2010 and December 2015.

RESULTS

We found that 20.9% of patients were incorrectly diagnosed initially. We observed mediastinum emphysema in 83.5% of patients, and serious abscess formations of the mediastinum and intrathoracic cavity in 38.6% and 29.6%, respectively. The lower esophagus was the most commonly perforated site (77.7%). Management of esophageal perforations included nonoperative treatment in 20 patients (11%) and operative treatment in 162 patients (89%). The overall mortality rate was 6.9%. The survivors had significantly shorter times from symptom appearance to visit (p = 0.0016), and from time to visit to diagnosis confirmation (p = 0.0011). Moreover, patients older than 65 years, white blood cells less than 3000/mm, C-reactive protein > 10 mg/L, or abscesses in the thoracic cavity showed significantly higher mortality than others.

CONCLUSION

Shortening the time from onset to the start of treatment contributes to reduce mortality in patients with esophageal perforation. Moreover, strict medical treatment is necessary to lower the mortality rate of elderly patients with strong inflammation and abscesses in the thoracic cavity.

摘要

目的

明确日本食管穿孔治疗现状。食管穿孔是最严重的胃肠道穿孔之一,具有较高的发病率和死亡率。目前仍缺乏最佳的治疗选择。

方法

回顾性分析日本食管学会认证的 108 家医院 2010 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间收治的 182 例食管穿孔患者的临床资料。

结果

患者最初误诊率为 20.9%。83.5%的患者出现纵隔气肿,38.6%和 29.6%的患者分别出现严重纵隔和胸腔脓肿形成。下段食管穿孔最为常见(77.7%)。20 例(11%)患者接受非手术治疗,162 例(89%)患者接受手术治疗。总死亡率为 6.9%。幸存者从出现症状到就诊的时间(p=0.0016)和从就诊到确诊的时间(p=0.0011)明显更短。此外,年龄>65 岁、白细胞计数<3000/mm³、C 反应蛋白>10mg/L 或胸腔脓肿患者的死亡率显著更高。

结论

缩短从发病到开始治疗的时间有助于降低食管穿孔患者的死亡率。对于存在强烈炎症和胸腔脓肿的老年患者,严格的内科治疗可能有助于降低死亡率。

相似文献

1
A national survey on esophageal perforation: study of cases at accredited institutions by the Japanese Esophagus Society.全国性食管穿孔调查:日本食管学会认定机构的病例研究。
Esophagus. 2020 Jul;17(3):230-238. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00744-7. Epub 2020 May 15.
2
Operative and nonoperative management of esophageal perforations.食管穿孔的手术及非手术治疗
Ann Surg. 1981 Jul;194(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198107000-00010.
3
Oesophageal perforation - therapeutic and diagnostics challenge. Retrospective, single-center case report analysis (2009-2015).食管穿孔——治疗与诊断的挑战。回顾性单中心病例报告分析(2009 - 2015年)
Pol Przegl Chir. 2017 Aug 31;89(4):1-4. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.3899.
4
Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality in Esophageal Perforation: Retrospective Study of 80 Patients.食管穿孔发病率及死亡率的预测因素:80例患者的回顾性研究
Scand J Surg. 2017 Jun;106(2):126-132. doi: 10.1177/1457496916654097. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
5
Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. Esophagectomy or primary repair?伴有纵隔感染的迟发性食管穿孔的治疗。食管切除术还是一期修复?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993 Dec;106(6):1088-91.
6
Could the Pittsburgh Severity Score guide the treatment of esophageal perforation? Experience of a single referral center.匹兹堡严重度评分能否指导食管穿孔的治疗?单中心经验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Jan 1;92(1):108-116. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003417.
7
Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality.成人食管穿孔:积极、保守治疗可降低发病率和死亡率。
Ann Surg. 2005 Jun;241(6):1016-21 ;discussion 1021-3. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000164183.91898.74.
8
Diagnosis and management of esophageal perforations.食管穿孔的诊断与处理
Am Surg. 1992 Feb;58(2):112-9.
9
Surgical management of esophageal perforation: role of primary closure.食管穿孔的外科治疗:一期缝合的作用
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2019 Mar;27(3):192-198. doi: 10.1177/0218492319827439. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
10
Modified T-tube repair of delayed esophageal perforation results in a low mortality rate similar to that seen with acute perforations.改良T形管修复术治疗延迟性食管穿孔的死亡率较低,与急性穿孔相似。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Mar;83(3):1129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Intramedullary Spinal Cord Abscess due to Traumatic Esophageal Perforation Associated with Cervicothoracic Anterior Osteophytes: A Case Report.创伤性食管穿孔合并颈胸段前路骨赘致脊髓内脓肿:一例报告
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Oct 5;9(1):100-103. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0194. eCollection 2025 Jan 27.
2
CT esophagogram in the emergency setting: typical findings and suggested workflow.急诊 CT 食管造影:典型表现和建议的工作流程。
Emerg Radiol. 2024 Feb;31(1):33-44. doi: 10.1007/s10140-023-02193-y. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
Surgical Management of Esophageal Perforation: Examining Trends in a Multi-Institutional Cohort.
食管穿孔的外科治疗:多机构队列研究中的趋势分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Sep;27(9):1757-1765. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05700-1. Epub 2023 May 10.
4
Bedside Ultrasonography in Evaluating Mediastinum Leakage in an Extremely-Low-Birth-Weight Infant with Esophageal Perforation.床旁超声检查在评估极低出生体重儿食管穿孔纵隔渗漏中的应用
AJP Rep. 2022 Feb 4;12(1):e76-e79. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741538. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
Spontaneous pneumomediastinum diagnosed by the Macklin effect.由麦金效应诊断的自发性纵隔气肿
J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jan 30;2022(1):rjab634. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjab634. eCollection 2022 Jan.