Sports Medicine Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute, Columbus, Ohio; OSU Sports Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Sports Medicine Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute, Columbus, Ohio; OSU Sports Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Oct;101(10):1796-1812. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 May 19.
This systematic review examines the facilitators and barriers to the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in outpatient rehabilitation settings and provides strategies to improve care to maximize patient outcomes.
Eleven databases were systematically searched from November 2018 to May 2019.
Two reviewers independently assessed articles based on the following inclusion criteria: English text, evaluate barriers and facilitators, include PROMs, and occur in an outpatient rehabilitation setting (physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech language pathology, or athletic training). Of the 10,164 articles initially screened, 15 articles were included in this study.
Data were extracted from the selected articles by 2 independent reviewers and put into an extraction template and into the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) model. The Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS) was conducted on each study to assess study design, risk of bias, and reporting quality of the eligible studies.
Ten studies were identified as high quality, according to the AXIS. Based on the CFIR model, the top barriers identified focused on clinician training and time in the implementation process, lack of recognized value and knowledge at the individual level, lack of access and support in the inner setting, and inability of patients to complete PROMs in the intervention process. Facilitators were identified as education in the implementation process, support and availability of PROMs in the inner setting, and recognized value at the individual level.
More barriers than facilitators have been identified, which is consistent with PROM underuse. Clinicians and administrators should find opportunities to overcome the barriers identified and leverage the facilitators to improve routine PROM use and maximize patient outcomes.
本系统评价考察了在门诊康复环境中使用患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的促进因素和障碍,并提供了改善护理以最大程度提高患者结局的策略。
从 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 5 月,系统地搜索了 11 个数据库。
两位评审员根据以下纳入标准独立评估文章:英文文本、评估障碍和促进因素、包含 PROMs 以及发生在门诊康复环境中(物理治疗、职业治疗、言语病理学或运动训练)。在最初筛选的 10164 篇文章中,有 15 篇文章被纳入本研究。
由 2 位独立评审员从选定的文章中提取资料,并将其放入提取模板和整合实施研究框架(CFIR)模型中。对每一项研究进行横断面研究评估工具(AXIS),以评估合格研究的研究设计、偏倚风险和报告质量。
根据 AXIS,有 10 项研究被确定为高质量。根据 CFIR 模型,确定的主要障碍集中在实施过程中的临床医生培训和时间、个人层面缺乏公认的价值和知识、内在环境中缺乏获取和支持、以及患者在干预过程中无法完成 PROMs。促进因素包括实施过程中的教育、内在环境中支持和 PROMs 的可用性以及个人层面的认可价值。
识别出的障碍多于促进因素,这与 PROM 的使用不足一致。临床医生和管理人员应寻找机会克服确定的障碍,并利用促进因素来改善常规 PROM 的使用并最大限度地提高患者结局。