Department of Genetics and Evolution, Science III, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
AZTI, Marine Research, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Spain.
Mol Ecol. 2021 Jul;30(13):2937-2958. doi: 10.1111/mec.15472. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
A decade after environmental scientists integrated high-throughput sequencing technologies in their toolbox, the genomics-based monitoring of anthropogenic impacts on the biodiversity and functioning of ecosystems is yet to be implemented by regulatory frameworks. Despite the broadly acknowledged potential of environmental genomics to this end, technical limitations and conceptual issues still stand in the way of its broad application by end-users. In addition, the multiplicity of potential implementation strategies may contribute to a perception that the routine application of this methodology is premature or "in development", hence restraining regulators from binding these tools into legal frameworks. Here, we review recent implementations of environmental genomics-based methods, applied to the biomonitoring of ecosystems. By taking a general overview, without narrowing our perspective to particular habitats or groups of organisms, this paper aims to compare, review and discuss the strengths and limitations of four general implementation strategies of environmental genomics for monitoring: (a) Taxonomy-based analyses focused on identification of known bioindicators or described taxa; (b) De novo bioindicator analyses; (c) Structural community metrics including inferred ecological networks; and (d) Functional community metrics (metagenomics or metatranscriptomics). We emphasise the utility of the three latter strategies to integrate meiofauna and microorganisms that are not traditionally utilised in biomonitoring because of difficult taxonomic identification. Finally, we propose a roadmap for the implementation of environmental genomics into routine monitoring programmes that leverage recent analytical advancements, while pointing out current limitations and future research needs.
环境科学家将高通量测序技术纳入其工具包十年后,基于基因组学的人为影响对生物多样性和生态系统功能的监测仍有待监管框架实施。尽管环境基因组学在这方面被广泛认为具有潜力,但技术限制和概念问题仍然阻碍了最终用户广泛应用。此外,潜在实施策略的多样性可能导致人们认为该方法的常规应用还不成熟或“在开发中”,从而限制监管机构将这些工具纳入法律框架。在这里,我们回顾了最近基于环境基因组学的方法的实施情况,这些方法应用于生态系统的生物监测。通过进行一般性概述,而不将我们的观点局限于特定的栖息地或生物群,本文旨在比较、审查和讨论用于监测的环境基因组学的四种一般实施策略的优缺点:(a)基于分类学的分析,重点是识别已知的生物标志物或描述的分类群;(b)从头开始的生物标志物分析;(c)结构群落指标,包括推断的生态网络;和(d)功能群落指标(宏基因组学或宏转录组学)。我们强调了后三种策略的实用性,它们可以整合传统生物监测中由于分类鉴定困难而未被利用的后生动物和微生物。最后,我们提出了将环境基因组学纳入常规监测计划的路线图,利用最近的分析进展,同时指出当前的限制和未来的研究需求。