Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom.
Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, United Kingdom.
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Jan;23(1):90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 May 13.
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of resection margin status in patients with KRAS mutations (mt-KRAS) when compared to those with wild-type KRAS (wt-KRAS) on long-term outcomes in patients with resected CRLM.
All patients who underwent resection of CRLM with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2016 and had a KRAS type recorded were included in the study. Overall survival (OS), as well as death-censored overall (RFS) and liver-specific (LS-RFS) recurrence-free survival between KRAS types and the margin status within KRAS subgroups were compared using Cox regression models.
Data were available for N = 500 patients (30.4% mt-KRAS). mt-KRAS status was independently associated with significantly shorter OS. Within the wt-KRAS subgroup, smaller margins were found to be associated with significantly shorter death-censored LS-RFS (p < 0.001), with HRs of 1.93 (p = 0.005) for 1-4 mm margins and 2.83 (p < 0.001) for <1 mm margins, relative to those with clear margins. No such association was observed in the mt-KRAS subgroup (p = 0.721).
The resection margin status is of greater importance in patients with wt-KRAS. Such information could be useful in the operative planning, especially for those with multiple metastatic deposits, and also in the post-operative counselling and surveillance based on the margin and KRAS status.
本研究旨在探讨 KRAS 突变(mt-KRAS)患者与 KRAS 野生型(wt-KRAS)患者相比,在接受结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)根治性切除术后长期结局方面,切缘状态的影响。
本研究纳入了 2011 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间接受 CRLM 根治性切除且 KRAS 类型记录完整的所有患者。采用 Cox 回归模型比较 KRAS 类型之间以及 KRAS 亚组内切缘状态之间的总生存(OS)、死亡风险校正总(RFS)和肝脏特异性(LS-RFS)无复发生存率。
本研究共纳入 500 例患者(30.4%为 mt-KRAS)。mt-KRAS 状态与 OS 显著缩短独立相关。在 wt-KRAS 亚组中,较小的切缘与死亡风险校正 LS-RFS 显著缩短相关(p<0.001),1-4mm 切缘的 HR 为 1.93(p=0.005),<1mm 切缘的 HR 为 2.83(p<0.001),与切缘清晰的患者相比。在 mt-KRAS 亚组中未观察到这种相关性(p=0.721)。
切缘状态在 wt-KRAS 患者中更为重要。这种信息在手术规划中可能有用,特别是对于那些有多发性转移灶的患者,并且也可以根据切缘和 KRAS 状态在术后咨询和监测中使用。