Accuracy of High-resolution Small-volume Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fracture: An In Vivo Analysis.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this in vivo study was to evaluate the accuracy of small-volume cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging compared with conventional periapical radiography (CPR) in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures (VRFs) using exploratory surgery as the reference standard.

METHODS

Eighty-two dental records of 85 teeth with suspected VRFs that underwent CPR, CBCT imaging, and exploratory surgery were included. Two observers assessed CPR and CBCT images independently for the presence or absence of root fractures, and findings from the exploratory surgery were considered the reference standard. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the receiver operating characteristic curve values were obtained. The effect of single- and multirooted teeth on diagnostic accuracy as well as the association between clinical symptoms and the presence of VRFs were also assessed.

RESULTS

VRFs were surgically detected in 64 of the 85 teeth (75.3%), of which 62.5% were multirooted and 76.6% had intracanal posts. CBCT imaging was more sensitive and accurate (65.6% and 64%) than CPR (27.3% and 40.5%). Both CPR and CBCT diagnostic accuracies were higher in single- than multirooted teeth. Pain on percussion, a localized periodontal pocket, and tooth mobility were associated with the presence of VRFs (P < .05; odds ratio = 4.15, 13.5 and 4.1, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of CBCT imaging for the diagnosis of VRFs was poor, although it was higher than with CPR. Multirooted teeth in the presence of intracanal posts may limit its diagnostic value.