Suppr超能文献

严重精神障碍患者的神经心理学特征与暴力风险:意大利一项前瞻性多中心研究。

Neuropsychological features in patients with severe mental disorders and risk of violence: A prospective multicenter study in Italy.

机构信息

Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy.

Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113027. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113027. Epub 2020 May 7.

Abstract

In Severe Mental Disorders (SMDs) the most important cognitive deficits involve the Executive Functions (EFs). In this study we examined the association between EFs and aggressive behaviour in outpatients with SMDs. We included a total of 247 outpatients divided into two groups: 'cases', patients with a history of violence (N=126) and 'non-violent' (N=121). We compared their EFs score and then categorized the participants into four groups (Pathological Non-Violent comparison group; Non-Pathological Non-Violent comparison group; Pathological Violent cases and Non-Pathological Violent cases), based on the scores of a subtest assessing processing speed (i.e., Symbol-coding task) of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). We followed the 4 groups during a 1-year follow-up (FU) monitoring violent behaviour with the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS). According to the classification based on the BACS-Symbol Coding Task we found no statistically significant differences between subgroups in MOAS scores. We only found that the trend curve for PV was almost consistently over the other group curves in the MOAS 'aggression against people'. Our results suggested a worse performance in the violent compared to non-violent group in EFs. Despite this evidence, the score on the processing speed task was not associated with aggressive behaviour during FU.

摘要

在严重精神障碍 (SMD) 中,最重要的认知缺陷涉及执行功能 (EF)。在这项研究中,我们研究了 SMD 门诊患者的 EF 与攻击行为之间的关系。我们共纳入了 247 名门诊患者,分为两组:“病例组”,有暴力史的患者(N=126)和“非暴力”组(N=121)。我们比较了他们的 EF 评分,然后根据评估认知功能的简短评估 (BACS) 中评估加工速度的子测试(即符号编码任务)的评分,将参与者分为四组(病理性非暴力对照组;非病理性非暴力对照组;病理性暴力组和非病理性暴力组)。我们对四组参与者进行了为期 1 年的随访 (FU),并使用改良外显攻击量表 (MOAS) 监测暴力行为。根据 BACS-Symbol 编码任务的分类,我们发现 MOAS 评分在亚组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。我们只发现,在 MOAS“针对人的攻击”中,PV 的趋势曲线几乎始终高于其他组的曲线。我们的结果表明,在 EF 方面,暴力组的表现明显差于非暴力组。尽管有这一证据,但在 FU 期间,加工速度任务的得分与攻击行为无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验