• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重精神障碍患者的神经心理学特征与暴力风险:意大利一项前瞻性多中心研究。

Neuropsychological features in patients with severe mental disorders and risk of violence: A prospective multicenter study in Italy.

机构信息

Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy.

Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113027. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113027. Epub 2020 May 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113027
PMID:32417593
Abstract

In Severe Mental Disorders (SMDs) the most important cognitive deficits involve the Executive Functions (EFs). In this study we examined the association between EFs and aggressive behaviour in outpatients with SMDs. We included a total of 247 outpatients divided into two groups: 'cases', patients with a history of violence (N=126) and 'non-violent' (N=121). We compared their EFs score and then categorized the participants into four groups (Pathological Non-Violent comparison group; Non-Pathological Non-Violent comparison group; Pathological Violent cases and Non-Pathological Violent cases), based on the scores of a subtest assessing processing speed (i.e., Symbol-coding task) of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). We followed the 4 groups during a 1-year follow-up (FU) monitoring violent behaviour with the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS). According to the classification based on the BACS-Symbol Coding Task we found no statistically significant differences between subgroups in MOAS scores. We only found that the trend curve for PV was almost consistently over the other group curves in the MOAS 'aggression against people'. Our results suggested a worse performance in the violent compared to non-violent group in EFs. Despite this evidence, the score on the processing speed task was not associated with aggressive behaviour during FU.

摘要

在严重精神障碍 (SMD) 中,最重要的认知缺陷涉及执行功能 (EF)。在这项研究中,我们研究了 SMD 门诊患者的 EF 与攻击行为之间的关系。我们共纳入了 247 名门诊患者,分为两组:“病例组”,有暴力史的患者(N=126)和“非暴力”组(N=121)。我们比较了他们的 EF 评分,然后根据评估认知功能的简短评估 (BACS) 中评估加工速度的子测试(即符号编码任务)的评分,将参与者分为四组(病理性非暴力对照组;非病理性非暴力对照组;病理性暴力组和非病理性暴力组)。我们对四组参与者进行了为期 1 年的随访 (FU),并使用改良外显攻击量表 (MOAS) 监测暴力行为。根据 BACS-Symbol 编码任务的分类,我们发现 MOAS 评分在亚组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。我们只发现,在 MOAS“针对人的攻击”中,PV 的趋势曲线几乎始终高于其他组的曲线。我们的结果表明,在 EF 方面,暴力组的表现明显差于非暴力组。尽管有这一证据,但在 FU 期间,加工速度任务的得分与攻击行为无关。

相似文献

1
Neuropsychological features in patients with severe mental disorders and risk of violence: A prospective multicenter study in Italy.严重精神障碍患者的神经心理学特征与暴力风险:意大利一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113027. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113027. Epub 2020 May 7.
2
Violence risk and mental disorders (VIORMED-2): A prospective multicenter study in Italy.暴力风险与精神障碍(VIORMED-2):意大利一项前瞻性多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 16;14(4):e0214924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214924. eCollection 2019.
3
Monitoring and predicting the risk of violence in residential facilities. No difference between patients with history or with no history of violence.监测和预测住宿机构中的暴力风险。有暴力史的患者与无暴力史的患者之间无差异。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Sep;80:5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 24.
4
[Application of MOAS for Evaluating of Violence Risk in the Inpatients with Mental Disorders].[MOAS在精神障碍住院患者暴力风险评估中的应用]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Feb;33(1):28-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5619.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
5
Prescribing Patterns of Psychotropic Drugs and Risk of Violent Behavior: A Prospective, Multicenter Study in Italy.精神药物处方模式与暴力行为风险:意大利一项前瞻性、多中心研究。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 May 27;23(5):300-310. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa005.
6
Aggressiveness and violence in psychiatric patients: a clinical or social paradigm?精神病患者的攻击行为和暴力:临床还是社会范式?
CNS Spectr. 2019 Oct;24(5):564-573. doi: 10.1017/S1092852918001438.
7
Predictors of violent behavior among acute psychiatric patients: clinical study.急性精神病患者暴力行为的预测因素:临床研究
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Jun;62(3):247-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01790.x.
8
Distinct impulsivity profiles in subtypes of violence among community-dwelling patients with severe mental disorders: a longitudinal study.社区居住的严重精神障碍患者中暴力亚类的不同冲动特征:一项纵向研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06044-z.
9
A neuropsychological investigation into violence and mental illness.一项关于暴力与精神疾病的神经心理学调查。
Schizophr Res. 2005 Apr 1;74(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.08.001.
10
[Application of modified overt aggression scales on risk behavior assessment of patients with mental illness].[改良版公开攻击量表在精神疾病患者风险行为评估中的应用]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;27(5):342-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between cognitive function and cortical thickness in first-episode drug-naive schizophrenia patients with agitation.首发未用药且伴有激越症状的精神分裂症患者认知功能与皮质厚度之间的关系
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 24;16:1576215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1576215. eCollection 2025.
2
Neurocognition and social cognition in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders with and without a history of violence: results of a multinational European study.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者有无暴力史的神经认知和社会认知:一项多国家欧洲研究的结果。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 8;11(1):620. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01749-1.