• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自行车能力评估方法的范围综述。

A Scoping Review of Bikeability Assessment Methods.

机构信息

College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.

Texas A&M School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):211-224. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00846-4.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-020-00846-4
PMID:32419079
Abstract

Bicycling holds promise as a healthy and sustainable means of transportation and physical activity. Despite the growing interest in community-based environmental approaches to promoting physical activity, bikeability has received relatively little attention. This paper provides a scoping review of the instruments developed to measure bikeability along with practice-based analyses of the tools related to user expertise, estimated cost, and required time to implement. The review summarizes the literature, identifies research gaps, and informs stakeholders with articles from EBSCO and transportation databases published after 2003 when the previous bikeability instrument review paper was published. Data extraction included the tool name, data collection method, study location, data collection scale, type of measure, and description. Two reviewers independently reviewed articles included in the full text review, and the inter-rater agreement exceeded 90%. The database search yielded 388 unique articles, and 17 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Most of the studies, 11 of 17, were applied to settings outside of the U.S. Five studies employed a self-report survey, and five studies examined bikeability using geospatial data, like GIS. Seven studies used a direct observation audit tool-one specifically using a mobile app and another using virtual observation techniques with Google Street View. Bikeability tools are useful for assessing communities and their supports for bicycling. Our primary finding is that advances in technology over the past two decades have driven innovative and useful methodologies, in a variety of disciplines, for assessing the environment, but more consensus is needed to provide a universal definition of bikeability.

摘要

骑自行车作为一种健康且可持续的交通和体育活动方式具有广阔的发展前景。尽管社区环境方法在促进体育活动方面越来越受到关注,但自行车出行能力却相对较少受到关注。本文对用于衡量自行车出行能力的工具进行了范围界定综述,并对与用户专业知识、估计成本和实施所需时间相关的工具进行了基于实践的分析。该综述总结了文献,确定了研究空白,并为利益相关者提供了 EBSCO 和交通数据库中 2003 年(上一次自行车出行能力工具综述论文发表后)发表的文章,以告知他们相关信息。数据提取包括工具名称、数据收集方法、研究地点、数据收集规模、测量类型和描述。两名审阅者独立审查全文审查中包含的文章,并且评分者间的一致性超过 90%。数据库搜索产生了 388 篇独特的文章,其中 17 篇符合纳入/排除标准。17 项研究中有 11 项在美国以外的环境中进行。五项研究采用了自我报告调查,五项研究使用了 GIS 等地理空间数据来检查自行车出行能力。有七项研究使用了直接观察审计工具——其中一项专门使用移动应用程序,另一项则使用 Google 街景的虚拟观察技术。自行车出行能力工具可用于评估社区及其对自行车出行的支持。我们的主要发现是,过去二十年中的技术进步推动了各种学科中评估环境的创新和有用方法,但需要更多共识来提供自行车出行能力的通用定义。

相似文献

1
A Scoping Review of Bikeability Assessment Methods.自行车能力评估方法的范围综述。
J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):211-224. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00846-4.
2
Walking and bicycling: an evaluation of environmental audit instruments.步行与骑行:环境审计工具评估
Am J Health Promot. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(1):21-37. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Reliability and validity of two instruments designed to assess the walking and bicycling suitability of sidewalks and roads.两种用于评估人行道和道路步行与骑行适宜性的工具的信度和效度。
Am J Health Promot. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(1):38-46. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.38.
5
Attributes of Perceived Bikeability in a Compact Urban Neighborhood Based on Qualitative Multi-Methods.基于定性多方法的紧凑型城市邻里中感知骑行便利性的特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 4;16(19):3738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193738.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Built environment instruments for walkability, bikeability, and recreation: disability and universal design relevant?适用于步行性、骑行性和娱乐性的建成环境工具:与残疾和通用设计相关吗?
Disabil Health J. 2012 Apr;5(2):87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.12.002.
8
Assessing the environmental characteristics of cycling routes to school: a study on the reliability and validity of a Google Street View-based audit.评估自行车上学路线的环境特征:基于谷歌街景的审计可靠性和有效性研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2014 Jun 10;13:19. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-19.
9
Bikeability and methodological issues using the active commuting route environment scale (ACRES) in a metropolitan setting.在大都市环境中使用主动通勤路线环境量表(ACRES)的自行车骑行能力和方法学问题。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jan 17;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-6.
10
The bikeability and walkability evaluation table reliability and application.自行车和步行适宜性评估表的可靠性和应用。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Nov;39(5):457-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Redefining Age-Friendly Neighbourhoods: Translating the Promises of Blue Zones for Contemporary Urban Environments.重新定义适合老年人居住的社区:将蓝区的承诺转化为当代城市环境。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 19;21(3):365. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030365.
2
Comparative Review of Environmental Audit Tools for Public Open Spaces from the Perspective of Children's Activity.从儿童活动角度比较公共开放空间环境审计工具
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13514. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013514.
3
Realtors' Perceptions of Social and Physical Neighborhood Characteristics Associated with Active Living: A Canadian Perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
2
Path Analysis of Campus Walkability/Bikeability and College Students' Physical Activity Attitudes, Behaviors, and Body Mass Index.校园步行/骑行便利性与大学生身体活动态度、行为及体重指数的路径分析
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):578-586. doi: 10.1177/0890117116666357. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Which environmental factors most strongly influence a street's appeal for bicycle transport among adults? A conjoint study using manipulated photographs.
房地产经纪人对与积极生活相关的社会和物质邻里特征的看法:加拿大视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;17(23):9150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239150.
哪些环境因素对成年人选择街道进行自行车出行的吸引力影响最大?一项使用人工处理照片的联合分析研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2016 Sep 1;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12942-016-0058-4.
4
Using mental mapping to unpack perceived cycling risk.利用心理映射来剖析感知的骑行风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Mar;88:138-49. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
5
Assessing Walking and Cycling Environments in the Streets of Madrid: Comparing On-Field and Virtual Audits.评估马德里街道的步行和骑行环境:实地审计与虚拟审计的比较
J Urban Health. 2015 Oct;92(5):923-39. doi: 10.1007/s11524-015-9982-z.
6
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State indicator report on Physical Activity, 2014. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.疾病控制与预防中心。《2014年身体活动状况指标报告》。佐治亚州亚特兰大:美国卫生与公众服务部;2014年。
Adv Nutr. 2014 Nov 14;5(6):762-3. doi: 10.3945/an.114.007211. Print 2014 Nov.
7
Exploring bikeability in a suburban metropolitan area using the Active Commuting Route Environment Scale (ACRES).使用主动通勤路线环境量表(ACRES)探索郊区大都市区的自行车出行适宜性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Aug 15;11(8):8276-300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110808276.
8
Contribution of streetscape audits to explanation of physical activity in four age groups based on the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS).基于步行街微观尺度审计(MAPS)的街道景观审计对四个年龄组身体活动解释的贡献。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;116:82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.042. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
9
Sneakers and spokes: an assessment of the walkability and bikeability of U.S. postsecondary institutions.运动鞋与自行车:对美国高等院校步行便利性和骑行便利性的评估。
J Environ Health. 2012 Mar;74(7):8-15; quiz 42.
10
Exploring bikeability in a metropolitan setting: stimulating and hindering factors in commuting route environments.探索大都市环境中的自行车出行能力:通勤路线环境中的促进和阻碍因素。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 8;12:168. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-168.