• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

校园步行/骑行便利性与大学生身体活动态度、行为及体重指数的路径分析

Path Analysis of Campus Walkability/Bikeability and College Students' Physical Activity Attitudes, Behaviors, and Body Mass Index.

作者信息

Horacek Tanya M, Dede Yildirim E, Kattelmann K, Brown O, Byrd-Bredbenner C, Colby S, Greene G, Hoerr S, Kidd T, Koenings M M, Morrell J, Olfert M D, Phillips B, Shelnutt K, White A

机构信息

1 Department of Public Health, Food Studies and Nutrition, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

2 Department of Child and Family Studies, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):578-586. doi: 10.1177/0890117116666357. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1177/0890117116666357
PMID:27630109
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the walkability/bikeability of college campuses and students' body mass index (BMI) with student physical activity (PA) attitudes and behaviors as potential mediators.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Thirteen university campuses.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1384 student participants.

MEASURES

Walkability/bikeability environmental score (ES): 12-item audit assessed an average of 44 path segments per campus. Students were measured for height and weight and completed online surveys. Physical activity stage of change/behavior intentions were assessed using the transtheoretical model. The Cognitive Behavioral Physical Activity Questionnaire assessed outcome expectations, self-regulation, and personal barriers. International Physical Activity Questionnaire assessed walking-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity PA.

ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics, zero-order correlations, and path analysis with maximum likelihood estimation.

RESULTS

The overall model fit was good with χ of 171.388 ( df = 18), P < .001, comparative fit index value of .95, and a root mean square of approximation of .079. After controlling for gender, there was a direct negative association between walkability/bikeability ES and BMI (β = -.085) and positive association between personal barriers and BMI (β = .134). Walkability/bikeability ES was positively associated with walking-intensity PA (β = .010). Self-regulation was positively associated with moderate-intensity PA (β = .213), which, in turn, was negatively associated with BMI (β = -.057).

CONCLUSIONS

The ease of walking and biking on a campus was related to college students' walking behavior and their BMI. Students' PA behavioral intentions were associated with moderate PA and lower BMI. These results provide evidence to focus on policies and structural supports for walkable/bikeable environments to supplement and enhance interventions encouraging individual behavior change for PA and weight management.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估大学校园的步行便利性/骑行便利性与学生体重指数(BMI)之间的关系,并将学生的身体活动(PA)态度和行为作为潜在中介因素。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

13所大学校园。

参与者

共1384名学生参与者。

测量方法

步行便利性/骑行便利性环境评分(ES):采用12项审核,每个校园平均评估44条路径段。测量学生的身高和体重,并完成在线调查。使用跨理论模型评估身体活动的变化阶段/行为意图。认知行为身体活动问卷评估结果期望、自我调节和个人障碍。国际身体活动问卷评估步行、中等强度和剧烈强度的身体活动。

分析

描述性统计、零阶相关性以及采用最大似然估计的路径分析。

结果

整体模型拟合良好,χ值为171.388(自由度=18),P<.001,比较拟合指数值为.95,近似均方根为.079。在控制性别后,步行便利性/骑行便利性ES与BMI之间存在直接负相关(β = -.085),个人障碍与BMI之间存在正相关(β = .134)。步行便利性/骑行便利性ES与步行强度的身体活动呈正相关(β = .010)。自我调节与中等强度的身体活动呈正相关(β = .213),而中等强度的身体活动又与BMI呈负相关(β = -.057)。

结论

校园内步行和骑行的便利性与大学生的步行行为及其BMI有关。学生的身体活动行为意图与中等强度的身体活动和较低的BMI相关。这些结果为关注可步行/可骑行环境的政策和结构支持提供了证据,以补充和加强鼓励个人行为改变以促进身体活动和体重管理的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Path Analysis of Campus Walkability/Bikeability and College Students' Physical Activity Attitudes, Behaviors, and Body Mass Index.校园步行/骑行便利性与大学生身体活动态度、行为及体重指数的路径分析
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):578-586. doi: 10.1177/0890117116666357. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
2
Sneakers and spokes: an assessment of the walkability and bikeability of U.S. postsecondary institutions.运动鞋与自行车:对美国高等院校步行便利性和骑行便利性的评估。
J Environ Health. 2012 Mar;74(7):8-15; quiz 42.
3
Perceived Built Environment Characteristics of On-Campus and Off-Campus Neighborhoods Associated With Physical Activity of College Students.与大学生身体活动相关的校内和校外社区的感知建成环境特征。
J Am Coll Health. 2015;63(5):337-42. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1015027.
4
Active commuting patterns at a large, midwestern college campus.在一个中西部大型大学校园里的积极通勤模式。
J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(7):605-11. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2010.518327.
5
Residential moves, neighbourhood walkability, and physical activity: a longitudinal pilot study in Ontario Canada.住宅迁移、邻里可步行性与身体活动:加拿大安大略省的一项纵向试点研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 28;18(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5858-y.
6
The influence of body mass index, sex, and race on college students' optimistic bias for lifestyle healthfulness.体质指数、性别和种族对大学生生活方式健康乐观偏差的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011 Sep-Oct;43(5):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.09.016. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
7
Physical activity and gender differences: correlates of compliance with recommended levels of five forms of physical activity among students at nine universities in Libya.体育活动与性别差异:利比亚九所大学学生对五种体育活动推荐水平的依从性相关因素
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2014 Jun;22(2):98-105. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a4011.
8
Neighborhood design for walking and biking: physical activity and body mass index.步行和骑车出行的邻里设计:身体活动与身体质量指数
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Mar;44(3):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.024.
9
Are total, intensity- and domain-specific physical activity levels associated with life satisfaction among university students?大学生的总体、强度和特定领域的身体活动水平与生活满意度相关吗?
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 19;10(2):e0118137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118137. eCollection 2015.
10
Association between Campus Walkability and Affective Walking Experience, and the Mediating Role of Walking Attitude.校园可步行性与情感步行体验的关系,以及步行态度的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 5;19(21):14519. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114519.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring nonlinear and interaction effects of urban campus built environments on exercise walking using crowdsourced data.利用众包数据探索城市校园建成环境对健身步行的非线性和交互作用影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 30;13:1549786. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1549786. eCollection 2025.
2
The relationships between the campus built environment and walking activity.校园建筑环境与步行活动的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69881-8.
3
Exploring the association between campus environment of higher education and student health: A systematic review of findings and measures.
探索高等教育校园环境与学生健康之间的关联:研究结果与措施的系统综述
Urban For Urban Green. 2024 Jan;91. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128168. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
4
COVID-19 and campus users: A longitudinal and place-based study of university mobilities in Texas.新冠疫情与校园用户:德克萨斯州大学流动性的纵向和基于地点的研究。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104656. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104656. Epub 2023 May 14.
5
Why Do Students Walk or Cycle for Transportation? Perceived Study Environment and Psychological Determinants as Predictors of Active Transportation by University Students.为什么学生选择步行或骑车出行?以大学生为研究对象,探究其对出行方式选择的感知学习环境和心理决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041390.
6
College campuses' influence on student weight and related behaviours: A review of observational and intervention research.大学校园对学生体重及相关行为的影响:观察性研究与干预性研究综述
Obes Sci Pract. 2020 Sep 23;6(6):694-707. doi: 10.1002/osp4.445. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
How Does the Campus Environment Influence Everyday Physical Activity? A Photovoice Study Among Students of Two German Universities.校园环境如何影响日常体力活动?两所德国大学学生的影像法研究。
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 5;8:561175. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.561175. eCollection 2020.
8
A Scoping Review of Bikeability Assessment Methods.自行车能力评估方法的范围综述。
J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):211-224. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00846-4.
9
Neighborhood Built Environment and Socioeconomic Status are Associated with Active Commuting and Sedentary Behavior, but not with Leisure-Time Physical Activity, in University Students.社区建成环境和社会经济地位与大学生的主动通勤和久坐行为相关,但与休闲时间体力活动无关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 31;16(17):3176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173176.
10
Redesign, Field-Testing, and Validation of the Physical Activity Campus Environmental Supports (PACES) Audit.重新设计、现场测试和验证《校园体力活动环境支持(PACES)评估》。
J Environ Public Health. 2019 May 19;2019:5819752. doi: 10.1155/2019/5819752. eCollection 2019.