• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从儿童期到青春期的 II 类错颌中的骨骼生长:侧貌会变直吗?

Skeletal growth in class II malocclusion from childhood to adolescence: does the profile straighten?

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

Community Dental Service, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

出版信息

Prog Orthod. 2020 May 18;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00313-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40510-020-00313-9
PMID:32419086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7231809/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is relatively little appreciation of the changes in maxillary-mandibular relationships occurring during adolescence among subjects with normal and increased overjet. The aim of this study was to assess differences in changes in maxillo-mandibular relationships during the adolescent growth period based on the presence of a normal (< 4 mm) or increased (> 4 mm) overjet in childhood. Our hypothesis was that there is no difference in the change of the A point, nasion, B point (ANB) angle during growth between these two overjet groups. Lateral cephalograms were obtained from 65 subjects taken from the American Association of Orthodontists Foundation (AAOF) Craniofacial Growth Legacy Collections Project. Cephalograms were obtained at ages 7-10 (T0) and 14-17 (T1) with allocation into two groups based on baseline overjet (> 4 mm: group 1, 2-4 mm: group 2). Random effects linear regression was used to account for multiple within -patient measurements with dependent variables including antero-posterior skeletal pattern (based on sella, nasion, A point (SNA); sella, nasion, B point (SNB); and ANB angles).

RESULTS

We included a similar number of males (n = 34; 52.3%) and females (n = 31; 47.7%). The mean ANB was higher at baseline in group 1 (5.42, SD 2.16°) than in group 2 (3.08, SD 1.91°). The hypothesis was rejected as the ANB angle reduced by 1.92° more in the larger overjet group with the association being statistically significant after accounting for age and gender (P < 0.001; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.77). No significant gender-related effect (P = 0.624; 95% CI - 0.637 to 1.07) was observed overall. However, there was no significant increase in SNA angle in the > 4 mm overjet group compared to the 2-4 mm group (0.857°, P = 0.271; 95% CI - 0.669 to 2.383). The SNB angle increased by 1.15° more in the higher overjet group but there was only weak evidence of an association (P = 0.086; 95% CI - 2.464 to 0.164).

CONCLUSIONS

A slight straightening of the facial profile was observed in both groups with a statistically significant greater reduction in ANB arising in the group with larger baseline overjet. This translated into a marginal reduction in the overjet in this group.

摘要

背景

对于正常覆 和深覆 的儿童,人们对其在青春期上颌-下颌关系变化的认识相对较少。本研究旨在评估基于儿童时期正常(<4mm)或深覆 (>4mm)的前提下,在青春期生长过程中上颌-下颌关系变化的差异。我们的假设是,在生长过程中,这两个覆 组的 A 点、鼻根点(Nasion)、B 点(ANB)角度的变化没有差异。从美国正畸医师协会基金会(AAOF)颅面生长遗产收藏项目中获取了 65 名受试者的侧位头颅侧位片。头颅侧位片在 7-10 岁(T0)和 14-17 岁(T1)时拍摄,并根据基线覆 分为两组(>4mm:组 1,2-4mm:组 2)。使用随机效应线性回归来解释多个患者内测量,因变量包括前后骨骼模式(基于蝶鞍、鼻根点、A 点(SNA);蝶鞍、鼻根点、B 点(SNB)和 ANB 角)。

结果

我们纳入了相似数量的男性(n=34;52.3%)和女性(n=31;47.7%)。组 1 的基线 ANB 更高(5.42,SD 2.16°),组 2 为 3.08,SD 1.91°。由于年龄和性别因素的影响,假设被拒绝,较大覆 组的 ANB 角减少了 1.92°,且关联具有统计学意义(P<0.001;95%CI 1.06 至 2.77)。总体而言,没有观察到与性别相关的显著影响(P=0.624;95%CI-0.637 至 1.07)。与 2-4mm 组相比,>4mm 覆 组的 SNA 角没有明显增加(0.857°,P=0.271;95%CI-0.669 至 2.383)。较高覆 组的 SNB 角增加了 1.15°,但关联证据较弱(P=0.086;95%CI-2.464 至 0.164)。

结论

两组均观察到面部轮廓略有变直,较大基线覆 的组中 ANB 的减少具有统计学意义。这导致该组的覆 略有减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dfc/7231809/7c8f79aaac35/40510_2020_313_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dfc/7231809/7c8f79aaac35/40510_2020_313_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dfc/7231809/7c8f79aaac35/40510_2020_313_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Skeletal growth in class II malocclusion from childhood to adolescence: does the profile straighten?从儿童期到青春期的 II 类错颌中的骨骼生长:侧貌会变直吗?
Prog Orthod. 2020 May 18;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00313-9.
2
Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.激活器与高位牵引头帽联合治疗的效果:骨骼、牙牙槽及软组织侧貌变化
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Apr;29(2):140-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm003.
3
One phase or two phase orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion ?安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形采用一期还是二期正畸治疗?
Evid Based Dent. 2019 Sep;20(3):72-73. doi: 10.1038/s41432-019-0049-y.
4
New Materials for Orthodontic Interceptive Treatment in Primary to Late Mixed Dentition. A Retrospective Study Using Elastodontic Devices.乳牙期至替牙后期正畸阻断性治疗的新材料。一项使用弹性正畸装置的回顾性研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 30;14(7):1695. doi: 10.3390/ma14071695.
5
Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.骨性 III 类错(牙合)患者根据骨骼差异和覆盖过大的牙牙槽补偿。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Mar;145(3):317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.11.014.
6
Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study.9至18岁未经治疗的I类和II类女童颅面生长的比较:一项纵向研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Feb;147(2):190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.023.
7
Class II treatment in early mixed dentition with the eruption guidance appliance: effects and long-term stability.早期混合牙列中使用萌出诱导矫治器进行 II 类治疗:效果和长期稳定性。
Eur J Orthod. 2020 Apr 1;42(2):151-156. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz092.
8
Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.在不同颈椎成熟阶段的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者中,对Twin Block矫治器效果的头影测量评估
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jun;21(3):73-84. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.3.073-084.oar.
9
Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite.安氏 I 类、安氏 II 类 1 分类或安氏 II 类 2 分类错(牙合)伴上前牙过度覆(牙合)的成人的牙颌面形态。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Aug;156(2):248-256.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.006.
10
A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.一项关于采用下颌骨手术治疗安氏II类错牙合畸形的头影测量研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jan;131(1):7.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.027.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of vertical skeletal proportions on overbite changes in untreated adolescents: a longitudinal evaluation.垂直骨骼比例对未经治疗的青少年前牙反覆盖变化的影响:一项纵向评估。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Jan 1;94(1):25-30. doi: 10.2319/042823-310.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Bias from historical control groups used in orthodontic research: a meta-epidemiological study.正畸研究中使用历史对照组的偏倚:一项元流行病学研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Feb;39(1):98-105. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw035. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
2
Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study.9至18岁未经治疗的I类和II类女童颅面生长的比较:一项纵向研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Feb;147(2):190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.023.
3
Evidence of secular trends in a collection of historical craniofacial growth studies.
一组历史颅面生长研究中的长期趋势证据。
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Feb;37(1):60-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju007. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
4
Stability of Class II treatment with the Bionator followed by fixed appliances.Bionator 治疗后再用固定矫治器治疗 II 类错[牙合]的稳定性。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Nov-Dec;21(6):547-53. doi: 10.1590/1679-775720130002.
5
Dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion associated with maxillary skeletal protrusion: a longitudinal study at the circumpubertal growth period.与上颌骨骨性前突相关的安氏II类错牙合的牙颌面特征:青春期生长发育期的纵向研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 May;135(5):568.e1-7; discussion 568-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.026.
6
Dentofacial growth changes in subjects with untreated Class II malocclusion from late puberty through young adulthood.从未经治疗的安氏II类错牙合患者从青春期末期到成年早期的牙颌面生长变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Feb;135(2):148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.033.
7
Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.安氏II类1分类错牙合未治疗患者的纵向生长变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.028.
8
Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.上颌骨与下颌骨矢状关系的年龄相关变化。
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Dec;27(6):568-78. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji061. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
9
A comparison of craniofacial Class I and Class II growth patterns.颅面I类和II类生长模式的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Apr;125(4):463-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.05.012.
10
Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class I subjects with low, average, and high MP-SN angles: a longitudinal study.未经治疗的低、中、高下颌平面角与鼻根点至鼻下点连线夹角的骨性Ⅰ类患者的颅面生长发育:一项纵向研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Dec;124(6):670-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.02.004.