Suppr超能文献

评估用于小肠胶囊内镜检查的联合肠道准备:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。

Evaluating a combined bowel preparation for small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized-controlled study.

作者信息

Hansel Stephanie L, Murray Joseph A, Alexander Jeffrey A, Bruining David H, Larson Mark V, Mangan Thomas F, Dierkhising Ross A, Almazar Ann E, Rajan Elizabeth

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019 Oct 19;8(1):31-35. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goz054. eCollection 2020 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is frequently hindered by intra-luminal debris. Our aim was to determine whether a combination bowel preparation would improve small-bowel visualization, diagnostic yield, and the completion rate of CE.

METHODS

Single-blind, prospective randomized-controlled study of outpatients scheduled for CE. Bowel-preparation subjects ingested 2 L of polyethylene glycol solution the night prior to CE, 5 mL simethicone and 5 mg metoclopramide 20 minutes prior to CE and laid in the right lateral position 30 minutes after swallowing CE. Controls had no solid food after 7 p.m. the night prior to CE and no liquids 4 hours prior to CE. Participants completed a satisfaction survey. Capsule readers completed a small-bowel-visualization assessment.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were prospectively enrolled (56% female) with a median age of 54.4 years and 44 completed the study (23 patients in the control group and 21 in the preparation group). There was no significant difference between groups on quartile-based small-bowel visualization (all >0.05). There was no significant difference between groups in diagnostic yield (=0.69), mean gastric (=0.10) or small-bowel transit time (=0.89). The small-bowel completion rate was significantly higher in the preparation group (100% vs 78%; =0.02). Bowel-preparation subjects reported significantly more discomfort than controls (62% vs 17%; =0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined bowel preparation did not improve small-bowel visualization but did significantly increase patient discomfort. The CE completion rate improved in the preparation group but the diagnostic yield was unaffected. Based on our findings, a bowel preparation prior to CE does not appear to improve CE performance and results in decreased patient satisfaction (ClinicalTrials.gov, No. NCT01243736).

摘要

背景

胶囊内镜检查(CE)常因管腔内碎片而受阻。我们的目的是确定联合肠道准备是否能改善小肠可视化、诊断率以及CE的完成率。

方法

对计划进行CE的门诊患者进行单盲、前瞻性随机对照研究。肠道准备组的受试者在CE前一晚摄入2升聚乙二醇溶液,在CE前20分钟摄入5毫升西甲硅油和5毫克甲氧氯普胺,并在吞咽CE后30分钟取右侧卧位。对照组在CE前一晚晚上7点后禁食固体食物,在CE前4小时禁饮液体。参与者完成满意度调查。胶囊阅读器完成小肠可视化评估。

结果

前瞻性纳入50例患者(56%为女性),中位年龄54.4岁,44例完成研究(对照组23例,准备组21例)。基于四分位数的小肠可视化在两组之间无显著差异(均>0.05)。两组在诊断率(=0.69)、平均胃排空时间(=0.10)或小肠通过时间(=0.89)方面无显著差异。准备组的小肠完成率显著更高(100%对78%;=0.02)。肠道准备组的受试者报告的不适明显多于对照组(62%对17%;=0.01)。

结论

联合肠道准备并未改善小肠可视化,但确实显著增加了患者的不适。准备组的CE完成率有所提高,但诊断率未受影响。根据我们的研究结果,CE前的肠道准备似乎并未改善CE的效果,且会导致患者满意度下降(ClinicalTrials.gov,编号NCT01243736)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2

本文引用的文献

3
Video capsule endoscopy: is bowel preparation necessary?视频胶囊内镜检查:肠道准备有必要吗?
J Investig Med. 2016 Aug;64(6):1114-7. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000153. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验