Freene Nicole, Borg Sabina, McManus Margaret, Mair Tarryn, Tan Ren, Davey Rachel, Öberg Birgitta, Bäck Maria
1Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617 Australia.
2Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT Australia.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2020 May 9;12:17. doi: 10.1186/s13102-020-00164-1. eCollection 2020.
Few studies have measured device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with no studies comparing these behaviours between countries using the same methods. The aim of the study was to compare device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour, using a harmonised approach, following a PCI on-entry into centre-based cardiac rehabilitation in two countries.
A cross-sectional study was conducted at two outpatient cardiac rehabilitation centres in Australia and Sweden. Participants were adults following a PCI and commencing cardiac rehabilitation (Australia = 50, Sweden = 133). Prior to discharge from hospital, Australian participants received brief physical activity advice (< 5 mins), while Swedish participants received physical activity counselling for 30 min. A triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X/ActiSleep) was used to objectively assess physical activity (light (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA)) and sedentary behaviour. Outcomes included daily minutes of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, and the proportion and distribution of time spent in each behaviour.
There was no difference in age, gender or relationship status between countries. Swedish (S) participants commenced cardiac rehabilitation later than Australian (A) participants (days post-PCI A 16 vs S 22, < 0.001). Proportionally, Swedish participants were significantly more physically active and less sedentary than Australian participants (LPA A 27% vs S 30%, < 0.05; MVPA A 5% vs S 7%, < 0.01; sedentary behaviour A 68% vs S 63%, < 0.001). When adjusting for wear-time, Australian participants were doing less MVPA minutes (A 42 vs S 64, < 0.001) and more sedentary behaviour minutes (A 573 vs S 571, < 0.001) per day. Both Swedish and Australian participants spent a large part of the day sedentary, accumulating 9.5 h per day in sedentary behaviour.
Swedish PCI participants when commencing cardiac rehabilitation are more physically active than Australian participants. Potential explanatory factors are differences in post-PCI in-hospital physical activity education between countries and pre-existing physical activity levels. Despite this, sedentary behaviour is high in both countries. Internationally, interventions to address sedentary behaviour are indicated post-PCI, in both the acute setting and cardiac rehabilitation, in addition to traditional physical activity and cardiac rehabilitation recommendations.
Australia: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12615000995572. Registered 22 September 2015, Sweden: World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set: NCT02895451.
很少有研究测量经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的基于设备的身体活动和久坐行为,且没有研究使用相同方法在不同国家之间比较这些行为。本研究的目的是在两个国家采用统一方法,比较PCI后进入心脏康复中心时基于设备的身体活动和久坐行为。
在澳大利亚和瑞典的两个门诊心脏康复中心进行了一项横断面研究。参与者为接受PCI并开始心脏康复的成年人(澳大利亚 = 50人,瑞典 = 133人)。在澳大利亚,参与者在出院前接受简短的身体活动建议(<5分钟),而瑞典参与者接受30分钟的身体活动咨询。使用三轴加速度计(Actigraph GT3X/ActiSleep)客观评估身体活动(轻度(LPA)、中度至剧烈(MVPA))和久坐行为。结果包括每日身体活动和久坐行为的分钟数,以及每种行为所花费时间的比例和分布。
两国在年龄、性别或婚姻状况方面没有差异。瑞典(S)参与者比澳大利亚(A)参与者开始心脏康复的时间晚(PCI后天数A为16天,S为22天,<0.001)。按比例计算,瑞典参与者的身体活动明显多于澳大利亚参与者,久坐时间明显少于澳大利亚参与者(LPA:A为27%,S为30%,<0.05;MVPA:A为5%,S为7%,<0.01;久坐行为:A为68%,S为63%,<0.001)。在调整佩戴时间后,澳大利亚参与者每天的MVPA分钟数较少(A为42分钟,S为64分钟,<0.001),久坐行为分钟数较多(A为573分钟,S为571分钟,<0.001)。瑞典和澳大利亚的参与者一天中大部分时间都处于久坐状态,每天久坐行为累计达9.5小时。
开始心脏康复时,瑞典PCI参与者的身体活动比澳大利亚参与者更多。潜在的解释因素是两国PCI后住院期间身体活动教育的差异以及既往身体活动水平。尽管如此,两国的久坐行为发生率都很高。在国际上,除了传统的身体活动和心脏康复建议外,PCI后在急性环境和心脏康复中都需要采取干预措施来解决久坐行为问题。
澳大利亚:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR):ACTRN12615000995572。2015年9月22日注册;瑞典:世界卫生组织试验注册数据集:NCT02895451。