Murphy Melissa G, Rakes Sarah, Harris Rachel M
College of Social Work, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
J Evid Based Soc Work (2019). 2020 May-Jun;17(3):279-299. doi: 10.1080/26408066.2020.1729281. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
: The (SRS) is a measure used in psychotherapy practice. Given its application and frequent use in clinical practice settings, several studies including primary validation studies as well as outcome studies reporting psychometric properties have examined the validity and reliability of the SRS. Because the SRS is designed to be used in clinical practice, demonstration of reliability and validity is ideal with clinical populations instead of non-clinical populations. To our knowledge, there have been no reviews evaluating the psychometric properties of the SRS with clinical populations.: The aim of this study was to review and synthesize the psychometric properties of the SRS by examining all relevant outcome and validation studies.: We completed an electronic literature search of several online databases in order to identify relevant articles. We identified 12 articles that met our inclusion and analyzed the reliability and validity evidence for the SRS with clinical populations.: Findings showed high internal consistency for the SRS and support evidence that the underlying dimension is a measure of therapeutic alliance. Test-retest reliability estimates were reported in 4 of the 12 studies included in this review (ranging from .54 to .70). The SRS had low to moderate concurrent validity with other longer measures of therapeutic alliance (.29 with ORS; .48 with HAQ II; .57-.65 with WAI).: Clinicians should be aware of the limitations in validity evidence for the SRS that may result from its brevity. However, clinicians should also consider the relative stability of the SRS as a pragmatic global measure of the construct of therapeutic alliance. Future research efforts should focus on validation of the SRS with larger, more diverse samples and specific clinical populations with a wider range of symptom severity.
简短治疗联盟量表(SRS)是心理治疗实践中使用的一种测量工具。鉴于其在临床实践环境中的应用和频繁使用,包括初步验证研究以及报告心理测量特性的结果研究在内的多项研究,都对SRS的有效性和可靠性进行了检验。由于SRS旨在用于临床实践,因此在临床人群而非非临床人群中证明其可靠性和有效性是理想的。据我们所知,尚无评估SRS在临床人群中心理测量特性的综述。
本研究的目的是通过审查所有相关的结果和验证研究,来综述和综合SRS的心理测量特性。
我们对几个在线数据库进行了电子文献检索,以识别相关文章。我们确定了12篇符合纳入标准的文章,并分析了SRS在临床人群中的可靠性和有效性证据。
研究结果显示,SRS具有较高的内部一致性,并支持其潜在维度是治疗联盟测量指标的证据。在本综述纳入的12项研究中,有4项报告了重测信度估计值(范围为0.54至0.70)。SRS与其他较长的治疗联盟测量工具的同时效度较低至中等(与ORS的相关系数为0.29;与HAQ II的相关系数为0.48;与WAI的相关系数为0.57 - 0.65)。
临床医生应意识到SRS有效性证据可能因其简短性而存在的局限性。然而,临床医生也应考虑SRS作为治疗联盟结构的实用整体测量工具的相对稳定性。未来的研究工作应集中于在更大、更多样化的样本以及具有更广泛症状严重程度范围的特定临床人群中对SRS进行验证。