Laughey William F, Brown Megan E L, Finn Gabrielle M
Health Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, Heslington, York, YO105DD UK.
Med Sci Educ. 2020 May 13;30(2):955-964. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00979-0. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Our understanding of clinical empathy could be enhanced through qualitative research-research currently under-represented in the field. Physician associates within the UK undergo an intensive 2-year postgraduate medical education. As a new group of health professionals, they represent a fresh pair of eyes through which to examine clinical empathy, its nature and teaching.
Working with a constructivist paradigm, utilising grounded theory methodology, researchers studied 19 purposively sampled physician associate students in two UK medical schools. One-to-one semi-structured interviews were transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using a grounded theory approach.
The global themes were , and a novel term to describe the discomfort students experience when pressurised into making empathic statements they don't sincerely feel. Students preferred using non-verbal over verbal expressions of empathy. A conceptual model is proposed. The more substantial empathic pathway, affective empathy, involves input from the heart. An alternative empathy, more constrained, comes from the head: cognitive empathy was considered a solution to time pressure and emotional burden. Formal teaching establishes empathic dissonance, a problem which stems from over-reliance on the empathic statement as the means to deliver clinical empathy.
This study furthers our understanding of the construct and teaching of empathy. It identifies empathic barriers, especially time pressure. It proposes a novel concept-a concept that challenges medical educationalists to reframe future empathy teaching.
通过定性研究可以加深我们对临床同理心的理解,而定性研究在该领域目前的代表性不足。英国的医师助理要接受为期两年的强化研究生医学教育。作为一群新的卫生专业人员,他们代表着全新的视角,可借此审视临床同理心及其本质和教学方法。
研究人员采用建构主义范式,运用扎根理论方法,对英国两所医学院校中19名经过目的抽样的医师助理专业学生进行了研究。一对一的半结构化访谈内容逐字转录。数据采用扎根理论方法进行分析。
主要主题包括……以及“同理心失谐”,这是一个新术语,用于描述学生在被迫做出并非真心感受的同理心表达时所体验到的不适感。学生们更倾向于使用非语言而非语言方式来表达同理心。研究提出了一个概念模型。更具实质性的同理心路径,即情感同理心,涉及内心的投入。另一种更受限制的同理心则来自于头脑:认知同理心被认为是应对时间压力和情感负担的一种方式。正式教学会导致同理心失谐,这一问题源于过度依赖同理心表达作为传递临床同理心的手段。
本研究进一步加深了我们对同理心的构成及教学的理解。它识别出了同理心障碍,尤其是时间压力。它提出了一个新概念——这一概念促使医学教育工作者重新构想未来的同理心教学。