Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, NL.
Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education, Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Jan 6;12(1):12-19. doi: 10.5334/pme.367. eCollection 2023.
In this philosophical reflection, we - following the philosopher Heidegger - introduce two farmers who represent different ways in which one can develop growth (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7jZigyfKHI for instructional video). One is a traditional farmer who entrusts the seeds to the soil and cultivates them with care and trust. The other is a modern farmer who takes an industrialized approach and positions the seeds and 'challenges-forth' the crops to show themselves in a certain way. We use these farmers as an analogy for the ways in which we as medical educators can and should relate to those we 'care' for: medical students and trainees. Taking a philosophical stance, and accounting for our own positionality and involvement in the analysis, we focus on 'Professional Identity Formation' and its operationalization in the field of medical education. We identify three main approaches medical education has taken to identity: as an individual trait, as a set of behaviors, and as a socialization process. All these approaches have at their root a similar assumption, namely that all inner processes can be made visible. We challenge this representational paradigm and use 'philosophical gardening' to raise awareness of what can and cannot be measured and controlled. Finally, we suggest educational approaches that leave space for diversity in students' experiences, learning approaches, and growth. We share good practices of brave teachers and curriculum designers whose interventions are characterized by less control and fewer measurements of personal growth, but more trust and free spaces for authentic learning.
在本次哲学反思中,我们——追随哲学家海德格尔——引入了两位农民,他们代表了两种不同的发展方式(参见 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7jZigyfKHI 获取教学视频)。一位是传统农民,他将种子托付给土地,并以关怀和信任来精心培育它们。另一位是现代农民,他采取工业化的方法,定位种子并“挑战”作物以特定的方式生长。我们将这些农民作为类比,来描述我们作为医学教育者可以并应该与我们所“关心”的对象(医学生和实习生)建立关系的方式。我们采取哲学立场,并考虑到我们自己的立场和参与分析的情况,专注于“专业身份形成”及其在医学教育领域的实施。我们确定了医学教育在身份认同方面采取的三种主要方法:作为个体特质、作为一组行为、以及作为社会化过程。所有这些方法都基于一个类似的假设,即所有内在过程都可以被呈现出来。我们挑战这种表现范式,并用“哲学园艺”来提高对可以和不能被衡量和控制的事物的认识。最后,我们提出了一些教育方法,为学生的经验、学习方法和成长留下了多样性的空间。我们分享勇敢的教师和课程设计者的良好实践,他们的干预措施的特点是较少的控制和对个人成长的较少衡量,但对真实学习有更多的信任和自由空间。