• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理学是一门“糟糕”的科学吗?《改写心理学》述评

Is Psychology an 'Abysmal' Science? A Review of Rewriting Psychology.

作者信息

Christensen Julie Bo

机构信息

Centre of Cultural Psychlogy, Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):710-717. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09540-5.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-020-09540-5
PMID:32424459
Abstract

Ho (2019) have provided a useful constructive critique of why psychology has not succeeded in becoming a 'real science'. This review includes a summary of the main points David Ho states in his new book and moves further into the discussion of 'successful science'. The main content of the book is summarized in five issues: (1) Psychology immersed in peoples' lives, (2) Cognition: What makes humans human, (3) Education, (4) Madness, religion and spirituality, and (5) Psychology applied to enhance the quality of life. What follows, is further elaboration of three main themes: 'abysmal' science, the gap between theoretical and applied psychology, and the aim of psychology. In addition, this follows the discussion initiated by Zagaria et al. (Integrative Psychology and Behavioral Science, 54, 3, 2020) who suggest an evolutionary psychology as the most compelling approach in scientific psychology while adding to this discussion a suggestion of an artistic psychology. With the notion of artistic as integrated in scientific the discussion is enriched and the developmental focus suggested is awakened. By integrating art as the pathway to 'science' Vygotsky's notion of aesthetic synthesis is re-visited.

摘要

何(2019年)对心理学为何未能成功成为一门“真正的科学”提出了有益的建设性批评。这篇综述总结了大卫·何在其新书中阐述的要点,并进一步深入探讨“成功的科学”。该书的主要内容归纳为五个问题:(1)心理学融入人们的生活;(2)认知:使人类之所以为人类的因素;(3)教育;(4)疯狂、宗教与灵性;(5)应用于提升生活质量的心理学。接下来,将进一步阐述三个主要主题:“糟糕的”科学、理论心理学与应用心理学之间的差距,以及心理学的目标。此外,这延续了扎加里亚等人(《综合心理学与行为科学》,第54卷,第3期,2020年)发起的讨论,他们认为进化心理学是科学心理学中最具说服力的方法,同时在此讨论基础上增加了艺术心理学的建议。随着将艺术概念融入科学,讨论得以丰富,所提出的发展重点也被唤醒。通过将艺术作为通向“科学”的途径,重新审视了维果茨基的审美综合概念。

相似文献

1
Is Psychology an 'Abysmal' Science? A Review of Rewriting Psychology.心理学是一门“糟糕”的科学吗?《改写心理学》述评
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):710-717. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09540-5.
2
From Clay Feet to New Psychology: Starting the Move.从泥足到新心理学:开启转变
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):515-520. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09564-x.
3
(Re)Introducing Vygotsky's Thought: From Historical Overview to Contemporary Psychology.(重新)引入维果茨基的思想:从历史概述到当代心理学
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 7;10:1515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01515. eCollection 2019.
4
Searching for an Integrative Theoretical Framework for Psychology: Evolutionary Psychology is Needed, But Not Sufficient.寻找心理学的综合理论框架:进化心理学是必要的,但并不充分。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):579-588. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09551-2.
5
Staying with Questions and Resisting Quick Answers: Commentary on Zagaria, Andò, and Zennaro.带着问题并抵制快速给出答案:对扎加里亚、安多和泽纳罗的评论
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):572-578. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09542-3.
6
Concerning Paradigmatic Status of Psychological Science: For a Flexible and Flowing Psychology in the Face of Practical and Theoretical Challenges.关于心理科学的范式地位:面对实践和理论挑战,构建灵活多变的心理学
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):604-612. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09530-7.
7
Vygotsky's Legacy Questioned: A Review of his "Analysts" and a Challenge to his "Emulators".维果茨基的遗产受到质疑:对他的“分析者”的回顾和对他的“模仿者”的挑战。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2023 Sep;57(3):888-912. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09754-3. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
8
Toward a Cultural Evolutionary Psychology: Why the Evolutionary Approach does not Imply Reductionism or Determinism.走向文化进化心理学:为什么进化方法并不意味着还原论或决定论。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Jun;55(2):225-249. doi: 10.1007/s12124-021-09613-z. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
9
One Step Further: Where to Put the Subjectivity of Human Mind in Efforts of Integrating Psychology?更进一步:在整合心理学的努力中,人类心智的主观性应置于何处?
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):597-603. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09549-w.
10
Getting Psychology Back Onto Its Feet: the Developmental View of James Mark Baldwin.让心理学重新站稳脚跟:詹姆斯·马克·鲍德温的发展观
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):686-693. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09535-2.