Fu Biao, Ran Boli, Zhang Hao, Luo Yuhui, Wang Jiao
Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, China.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Apr;60(3):529-533. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00772-4. Epub 2020 May 18.
New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. The meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the benefit of prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in typical AFL patients.
Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing prophylactic PVI to CTI ablation alone in typical AFL patients without prior documentation of AF were identified in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases.
Four RCTs met the inclusion criteria. A total of 357 patients with follow-up of 20 ± 9 months were included. More patients in prophylactic PVI group were free from atrial arrhythmias (AA) compared with those in CTI group (69% versus 50%, OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.51 to 3.68; P = 0.0001). In the subgroup of age > 55, prophylactic PVI showed even higher incidence of freedom from AA. There is a lower occurrence of AF in prophylactic PVI group (27% versus 46%, OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.73; P = 0.001) and no difference of complications between prophylactic PVI group and CTI group (4% versus 2%; P = 0.33).
Our study indicated the efficacy and safety of prophylactic PVI during CTI ablation in typical AFL patients without AF history, especially for elder patients. Large prospective RCTs are warranted to confirm the benefit of prophylactic PVI in typical AFL.
在三尖瓣峡部(CTI)依赖性房扑(AFL)消融术后,新发房颤(AF)很常见。本荟萃分析旨在评估在典型AFL患者中进行预防性肺静脉隔离(PVI)的益处。
在MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库中检索比较预防性PVI与单纯CTI消融治疗无AF既往记录的典型AFL患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。
四项RCT符合纳入标准。共纳入357例患者,随访时间为20±9个月。与CTI组相比,预防性PVI组无房性心律失常(AA)的患者更多(69%对50%,OR = 2.36,95%CI:1.51至3.68;P = 0.0001)。在年龄>55岁的亚组中,预防性PVI显示无AA的发生率更高。预防性PVI组AF的发生率较低(27%对46%,OR = 0.45,95%CI:0.28至0.73;P = 0.001),预防性PVI组与CTI组之间并发症无差异(4%对2%;P = 0.33)。
我们的研究表明,在无AF病史的典型AFL患者的CTI消融术中,预防性PVI是有效且安全的,尤其是对于老年患者。需要大型前瞻性RCT来证实预防性PVI在典型AFL中的益处。