• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2型糖尿病患者使用二甲双胍后下一步该如何治疗?为合适的患者选择合适的药物。

What Next After Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes? Selecting the Right Drug for the Right Patient.

作者信息

Strain W David, Tsang Carmen, Hurst Michael, McEwan Phil, Unadkat Minesh, Meadowcroft Simon, Shardlow Richard, Evans Marc

机构信息

Diabetes and Vascular Research Centre, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.

Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jun;11(6):1381-1395. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00834-w. Epub 2020 May 18.

DOI:10.1007/s13300-020-00834-w
PMID:32424798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7261289/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Metformin is the recommended initial treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but when this does not give adequate glucose control the choice of which second-line drug to use is uncertain as none have been found to have a better overall glycaemic response. In this real-world study dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), sulphonylureas (SU), thiazolidinediones (TZD) and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) were compared for their effectiveness in lowering glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels for a particular individual based on their clinical characteristics.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was undertaken of electronic health records of people with T2DM prescribed metformin alongside a DPP4i, SU, TZD or SGLT2i at second-line. Regression modelling was used to model the changes in HbA1c from baseline at month 6 and month 12 for the individual therapies, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

There were 7170 people included in the study. Treatment at second-line with SUs, DPP4i, TZDs and SGLT2i resulted in similar percentages of people achieving the recommended HbA1c target of < 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) at both 6 and 12 months. For those receiving SGLT2i and SUs, the greatest improvement in HbA1c was observed in relatively younger and older people, respectively. Trends were detected between other baseline characteristics and HbA1c improvement by drug class, but they were not statistically significant. Non-adherence rates were low for all drug classes. People with a higher medication possession ratio (≥ 80%) also had greater improvements in HbA1c at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

This study identified patients' phenotypic characteristics that may have the potential to influence individual treatment response. Accounting for these characteristics in clinical treatment decisions may facilitate individualised prescribing by being able to select the right drug for the right patient.

摘要

引言

二甲双胍是2型糖尿病(T2DM)的推荐初始治疗药物,但当血糖控制不佳时,由于尚未发现哪种二线药物具有更好的总体血糖反应,因此选择使用哪种二线药物并不明确。在这项真实世界研究中,比较了二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP4i)、磺脲类药物(SU)、噻唑烷二酮类药物(TZD)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)根据特定个体的临床特征降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的有效性。

方法

对接受二甲双胍治疗且二线使用DPP4i、SU、TZD或SGLT2i的T2DM患者的电子健康记录进行回顾性分析。采用回归模型对各治疗方案在第6个月和第12个月时HbA1c相对于基线的变化进行建模,并对人口统计学和临床特征进行调整。

结果

该研究共纳入7170人。二线使用SU、DPP4i、TZD和SGLT2i治疗的患者在6个月和12个月时达到推荐的HbA1c目标(<7.5%,即58 mmol/mol)的比例相似。对于接受SGLT2i和SU治疗的患者,分别在相对年轻和年长的人群中观察到HbA1c的最大改善。在其他基线特征与不同药物类别导致的HbA1c改善之间检测到了趋势,但无统计学意义。所有药物类别的不依从率均较低。药物持有率较高(≥80%)的患者在12个月时HbA1c的改善也更大。

结论

本研究确定了可能影响个体治疗反应的患者表型特征。在临床治疗决策中考虑这些特征,通过为合适的患者选择合适的药物,可能有助于个体化处方。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecff/7261289/c589e6d33cb6/13300_2020_834_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecff/7261289/c589e6d33cb6/13300_2020_834_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecff/7261289/c589e6d33cb6/13300_2020_834_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
What Next After Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes? Selecting the Right Drug for the Right Patient.2型糖尿病患者使用二甲双胍后下一步该如何治疗?为合适的患者选择合适的药物。
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jun;11(6):1381-1395. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00834-w. Epub 2020 May 18.
2
Long-term sustainability of glycaemic achievements with second-line antidiabetic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world study.2型糖尿病患者二线抗糖尿病治疗血糖控制效果的长期可持续性:一项真实世界研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jul;20(7):1722-1731. doi: 10.1111/dom.13288. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
3
Important differences in the durability of glycaemic response among second-line treatment options when added to metformin in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.2型糖尿病患者在二甲双胍基础上加用二线治疗方案时血糖反应耐久性的重要差异:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med. 2016;48(4):224-34. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2016.1157263. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
Intensification with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, insulin, or thiazolidinediones and risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases, and severe hypoglycemia in patients on metformin-sulfonylurea dual therapy: A retrospective cohort study.在二甲双胍-磺酰脲类双重疗法的患者中,强化使用二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂、胰岛素或噻唑烷二酮类药物与全因死亡率、心血管疾病和严重低血糖的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 26;16(12):e1002999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002999. eCollection 2019 Dec.
5
Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, the latest residents on the block: Impact on glycaemic control at a general practice level in England.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂,该领域的最新成员:对英格兰全科医疗水平血糖控制的影响
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jul;20(7):1659-1669. doi: 10.1111/dom.13281. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
6
Glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in seven European countries: findings from the Real-Life Effectiveness and Care Patterns of Diabetes Management (RECAP-DM) study.七个欧洲国家2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:糖尿病管理的真实生活有效性和护理模式(RECAP-DM)研究结果
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Jun;10 Suppl 1:8-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00881.x.
7
National trends in metformin-based combination therapy of oral hypoglycaemic agents for type 2 diabetes mellitus.2 型糖尿病患者二甲双胍为基础的口服降糖药联合治疗的国家趋势。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Dec;75(12):1723-1730. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02751-9. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
8
Effects of second-line antihyperglycemic drugs on the risk of chronic kidney disease: applying a target trial approach to a hospital-based cohort of Thai patients with type 2 diabetes.二线抗高血糖药物对慢性肾脏病风险的影响:应用目标试验方法对泰国 2 型糖尿病住院患者队列进行研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Nov 17;21(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01641-2.
9
Second-Line Pharmaceutical Treatments for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.二线药物治疗 2 型糖尿病患者。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336613. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36613.
10
Clinical effectiveness of second-line antihyperglycemic drugs on major adverse cardiovascular events: An emulation of a target trial.二线抗高血糖药物对主要不良心血管事件的临床疗效:一项目标试验的模拟。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 30;14:1094221. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1094221. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Rurality is associated with lower likelihood of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor use for treatment intensification.在农村地区,使用二肽基肽酶4抑制剂加强治疗的可能性较低。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Mar 3;13:100429. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100429. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Adherence to newer second-line oral antidiabetic drugs among people with type 2 diabetes-A systematic review.2 型糖尿病患者对新型二线口服降糖药的依从性:系统评价。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2024 Apr;12(2):e1185. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1185.
3
Predictors of HbA treatment response to add-on medication following metformin monotherapy: a population-based cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Addendum. 7. Diabetes Technology: . Diabetes Care 2020;43(Suppl. 1):S77-S88.附录7.糖尿病技术:《糖尿病护理》2020年;43(增刊1):S77 - S88。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1981. doi: 10.2337/dc20-ad08c. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
2
2019 update to: Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2019 年更新:2018 年版《2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理:美国糖尿病协会(ADA)与欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)共识报告》。
Diabetologia. 2020 Feb;63(2):221-228. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05039-w.
3
Identifying routine clinical predictors of non-adherence to second-line therapies in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort analysis in a large primary care database.
二甲双胍单药治疗后添加药物治疗 HbA 的反应预测因素:基于人群的队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 28;13(1):20891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47896-x.
4
Scrophulariae Radix-Atractylodes sinensis pair and metformin inhibit inflammation by modulating gut microbiota of high-fat diet/streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats.玄参-苍术药对与二甲双胍通过调节高脂饮食/链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病大鼠肠道微生物群来抑制炎症。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Nov 30;13:900021. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.900021. eCollection 2022.
识别2型糖尿病二线治疗方案不依从性的常规临床预测因素:一项基于大型初级保健数据库的回顾性队列分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Jan;22(1):59-65. doi: 10.1111/dom.13865. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
4
Time trends in prescribing of type 2 diabetes drugs, glycaemic response and risk factors: A retrospective analysis of primary care data, 2010-2017.2010-2017 年,基层医疗数据中 2 型糖尿病药物处方、血糖反应和风险因素的时间趋势:回顾性分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1576-1584. doi: 10.1111/dom.13687. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.达格列净与 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管结局
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 24;380(4):347-357. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
6
Expectations and fear of diabetes-related long-term complications in people with type 2 diabetes at primary care level.2 型糖尿病患者在基层医疗中对糖尿病相关长期并发症的期望和恐惧。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Jan;56(1):33-38. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1217-9. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
7
Incretin-Based Therapies and Diabetic Retinopathy: Real-World Evidence in Older U.S. Adults.基于肠降血糖素的治疗与糖尿病视网膜病变:美国老年成年人的真实世界证据。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Sep;41(9):1998-2009. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2285. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
8
Treatment choice, medication adherence and glycemic efficacy in people with type 2 diabetes: a UK clinical practice database study.2型糖尿病患者的治疗选择、药物依从性及血糖疗效:一项英国临床实践数据库研究
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018 May 5;6(1):e000512. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000512. eCollection 2018.
9
Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications.2 型糖尿病及其并发症的全球病因学和流行病学。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;14(2):88-98. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.151. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
The impact of cardiovascular co-morbidities and duration of diabetes on the association between microvascular function and glycaemic control.心血管合并症和糖尿病病程对微血管功能与血糖控制之间关联的影响。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Sep 15;16(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0594-7.