Suppr超能文献

半月板前角损伤的愈合状态影响前交叉韧带重建术后的膝关节前向稳定性。

Healing Status of Meniscal Ramp Lesion Affects Anterior Knee Stability After ACL Reconstruction.

作者信息

Hatayama Kazuhisa, Terauchi Masanori, Saito Kenichi, Takase Ryota, Higuchi Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Gunma Central Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 May 11;8(5):2325967120917674. doi: 10.1177/2325967120917674. eCollection 2020 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the biomechanical importance of the ramp lesion in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee has been demonstrated, there is no clear consensus on the appropriate treatment for ramp lesions during ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative outcomes for ramp lesions between patients treated with all-inside repair through the posteromedial portal and those whose ramp lesions were left in situ without repair during ACL reconstruction. We also determined whether ramp lesion healing status affected postoperative knee stability.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 57 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction between August 2011 and December 2017 had attendant ramp lesions. Of these, 25 ramp lesions that were considered stable were left in situ without repair (Nonrepaired group), and 25 ramp lesions, including 21 stable and 4 unstable lesions, were treated using all-inside repair through the posteromedial portal (Repaired group). We evaluated the side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior tibial translation on stress radiographs and rotational stability by using the pivot-shift test 2 years after surgery, and healing status of the ramp lesions was evaluated on 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean SSDs in anterior translation were 2.4 ± 1.6 mm for the Nonrepaired group and 1.9 ± 1.6 mm for the Repaired group, with no significant differences. The positive ratios on the pivot-shift test were not significantly different between groups. Healing rates of ramp lesions on MRI scans showed a significant difference between the Nonrepaired group (60%) and the Repaired group (100%) ( = .001). The mean SSDs for knees in which the ramp lesion had healed as shown on MRI scans and those in which it had not healed were 1.9 ± 1.6 mm and 3.2 ± 1.1 mm, respectively, which was a significant difference ( = .02).

CONCLUSION

Healing rates of ramp lesions were significantly better in the Repaired group than in the Nonrepaired group, although postoperative knee stability was not significantly different between groups. Anterior laxity in the knees in which the ramp lesion was unhealed was significantly greater compared with the knees in which the ramp lesion healed. All-inside repair through the posteromedial portal was a reliable surgical procedure to heal ramp lesions.

摘要

背景

尽管前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤膝关节中斜坡损伤的生物力学重要性已得到证实,但对于ACL重建过程中斜坡损伤的适当治疗尚无明确共识。

目的

比较经后内侧入路全内置修复治疗的患者与ACL重建过程中斜坡损伤未修复而原位保留的患者术后斜坡损伤的结果。我们还确定了斜坡损伤的愈合状态是否会影响术后膝关节稳定性。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

2011年8月至2017年12月期间共57例行解剖双束ACL重建的患者伴有斜坡损伤。其中,25处被认为稳定的斜坡损伤未修复而原位保留(未修复组),25处斜坡损伤,包括21处稳定损伤和4处不稳定损伤,采用经后内侧入路全内置修复治疗(修复组)。我们在术后2年通过应力X线片评估胫骨前移的双侧差异(SSD),并使用轴移试验评估旋转稳定性,术后1年通过3.0-T磁共振成像(MRI)扫描评估斜坡损伤的愈合状态。

结果

未修复组胫骨前移的平均SSD为2.4±1.6mm,修复组为1.9±1.6mm,差异无统计学意义。两组间轴移试验的阳性率差异无统计学意义。MRI扫描显示斜坡损伤的愈合率在未修复组(60%)和修复组(100%)之间存在显著差异(P = 0.001)。MRI扫描显示斜坡损伤愈合的膝关节和未愈合的膝关节的平均SSD分别为1.9±1.6mm和3.2±1.1mm,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。

结论

尽管两组术后膝关节稳定性差异无统计学意义,但修复组斜坡损伤的愈合率明显高于未修复组。与斜坡损伤愈合的膝关节相比,斜坡损伤未愈合的膝关节前侧松弛明显更大。经后内侧入路全内置修复是治疗斜坡损伤的可靠手术方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f431/7222250/9ee6a9c14e28/10.1177_2325967120917674-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验