Baye Fentaw, Wegayehu Fisseha, Mulugeta Solomon
Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development (EiABC), Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 518, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Faculty of Social Science, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Data Brief. 2020 May 8;30:105667. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105667. eCollection 2020 Jun.
The data collection strategy involved the use of multiple methods. While Primary source of data were collected through the use of structured and semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions and a questionnaire household survey; secondary data were gathered from published and unpublished materials and land related legal and policy documents. Primary data were gathered through house to house survey directly administered to a random sample of 244 household heads. Besides to the household survey, primary data were collected via in-depth interviews, and focus group discussion. Interviews were conducted with land brokers, land speculators, key informants and governmental officials. Focus group discussion was executed in two different sessions: one from kebele 04 and the other from the municipality. A total of 87 people from government officials, land brokers and speculators and key informants were interviewed. Secondary data were collected from available documents and land-related legal and policy documents. The data collection process is followed by a detailed qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The qualitative analysis part includes analysis of data obtained from interviews and focus group discussions. However, statistical analysis includes descriptive statistics such as cross tabulation, percentage and correlation were employed using IBM SPSS 20. Informal settlement continues to be a challenge in the contemporary urbanization in Ethiopia. Thus, these dataset have important implications for urban land policy both at local, national and wider audience beyond Ethiopia to reconsider urban informality. The data of this manuscript is associated with the publication [10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104573].
数据收集策略涉及使用多种方法。主要数据来源是通过结构化和半结构化访谈、焦点小组讨论以及问卷调查式的住户调查收集；次要数据则从已发表和未发表的材料以及与土地相关的法律和政策文件中收集。主要数据通过逐户调查直接收集，对象是随机抽取的244户户主。除了住户调查外，主要数据还通过深入访谈和焦点小组讨论收集。访谈对象包括土地经纪人、土地投机者、关键信息提供者和政府官员。焦点小组讨论分两场进行：一场来自第04区，另一场来自市辖区。总共对87名政府官员、土地经纪人和投机者以及关键信息提供者进行了访谈。次要数据从现有文件以及与土地相关的法律和政策文件中收集。数据收集过程之后是详细的定性和定量数据分析。定性分析部分包括对从访谈和焦点小组讨论中获得的数据进行分析。然而，统计分析包括描述性统计，如交叉制表、百分比和相关性分析，使用IBM SPSS 20软件进行。在埃塞俄比亚当代城市化进程中，非正式住区仍然是一个挑战。因此，这些数据集对于埃塞俄比亚当地、国家以及埃塞俄比亚以外更广泛受众的城市土地政策重新考虑城市非正式性具有重要意义。本手稿的数据与出版物[10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104573]相关联。
