• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将自动化整合到现有的临床工作流程中,以提高全身照射(TBI)手动治疗计划过程的效率并减少错误。

Integration of automation into an existing clinical workflow to improve efficiency and reduce errors in the manual treatment planning process for total body irradiation (TBI).

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jul;21(7):100-106. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12894. Epub 2020 May 19.

DOI:10.1002/acm2.12894
PMID:32426947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7386186/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify causes of error, and present the concept of an automated technique that improves efficiency and helps to reduce transcription and manual data entry errors in the treatment planning of total body irradiation (TBI).

METHODS

Analysis of incidents submitted to incident learning system (ILS) was performed to identify potential avenues for improvement by implementation of automation of the manual treatment planning process for total body irradiation (TBI). Following this analysis, it became obvious that while the individual components of the TBI treatment planning process were well implemented, the manual 'bridging' of the components (transcribing data, manual data entry etc.) were leading to high potential for error. A C#-based plug-in treatment planning script was developed to remove the manual parts of the treatment planning workflow that were contributing to increased risk.

RESULTS

Here we present an example of the implementation of "Glue" programming, combining treatment planning C# scripts with existing spreadsheet calculation worksheets. Prior to the implementation of automation, 35 incident reports related to the TBI treatment process were submitted to the ILS over a 6-year period, with an average of 1.4 ± 1.7 reports submitted per quarter. While no incidents reached patients, reports ranged from minor documentation issues to potential for mistreatment if not caught before delivery. Since the implementation of automated treatment planning and documentation, treatment planning time per patient, including documentation, has been reduced; from an average of 45 min pre-automation to <20 min post-automation.

CONCLUSIONS

Manual treatment planning techniques may be well validated, but they are time-intensive and have potential for error. Often the barrier to automating these techniques becomes the time required to "re-code" existing solutions in unfamiliar computer languages. We present the workflow here as a proof of concept that automation may help to improve clinical efficiency and safety for special procedures.

摘要

目的

识别错误原因,并提出一种自动化技术的概念,该技术可提高效率,并有助于减少全身照射(TBI)治疗计划中的转录和手动数据输入错误。

方法

对事件学习系统(ILS)提交的事件进行分析,以确定通过自动化全身照射(TBI)的手动治疗计划流程来提高效率的潜在途径。在进行了这项分析之后,很明显,虽然 TBI 治疗计划过程的各个组成部分都得到了很好的实施,但组件之间的手动“桥接”(转录数据、手动数据输入等)导致了高出错风险。开发了一个基于 C#的插件治疗计划脚本,以消除导致风险增加的治疗计划工作流程的手动部分。

结果

在这里,我们展示了“Glue”编程的实施示例,将治疗计划 C#脚本与现有的电子表格计算工作表相结合。在实施自动化之前,在 6 年的时间内,有 35 份与 TBI 治疗过程相关的事件报告提交给 ILS,平均每季度提交 1.4±1.7 份报告。虽然没有事件涉及到患者,但报告的范围从轻微的文档问题到如果在交付前没有发现可能的不当治疗。自从实施了自动化治疗计划和文档记录以来,每位患者的治疗计划时间(包括文档记录)已从自动化前的平均 45 分钟减少到自动化后的<20 分钟。

结论

手动治疗计划技术可能已经得到充分验证,但它们耗时且存在出错的风险。通常,将这些技术自动化的障碍是在不熟悉的计算机语言中“重新编码”现有解决方案所需的时间。我们在此提出工作流程,作为一个概念验证,证明自动化可能有助于提高特殊程序的临床效率和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a48c/7386186/ccbe3d5863f8/ACM2-21-100-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a48c/7386186/f8db1c5bcb50/ACM2-21-100-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a48c/7386186/26c8e5a37c29/ACM2-21-100-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a48c/7386186/ccbe3d5863f8/ACM2-21-100-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a48c/7386186/f8db1c5bcb50/ACM2-21-100-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a48c/7386186/26c8e5a37c29/ACM2-21-100-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a48c/7386186/ccbe3d5863f8/ACM2-21-100-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Integration of automation into an existing clinical workflow to improve efficiency and reduce errors in the manual treatment planning process for total body irradiation (TBI).将自动化整合到现有的临床工作流程中,以提高全身照射(TBI)手动治疗计划过程的效率并减少错误。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jul;21(7):100-106. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12894. Epub 2020 May 19.
2
Are we making an impact with incident learning systems? Analysis of quality improvement interventions using total body irradiation as a model system.我们是否通过事件学习系统产生了影响?以全身放射治疗为模型系统的质量改进干预措施的分析。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov-Dec;7(6):418-424. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
3
Targeting safety improvements through identification of incident origination and detection in a near-miss incident learning system.通过在未遂事件学习系统中识别事件起源和检测来实现安全改进目标。
Med Phys. 2016 May;43(5):2053-2062. doi: 10.1118/1.4944739.
4
Personalized automated treatment planning for breast plus locoregional lymph nodes using Hybrid RapidArc.采用 Hybrid RapidArc 对乳房加局部淋巴结进行个体化自动治疗计划。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Sep-Oct;8(5):332-341. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
5
A risk assessment of automated treatment planning and recommendations for clinical deployment.自动化治疗计划的风险评估及临床应用建议。
Med Phys. 2019 Jun;46(6):2567-2574. doi: 10.1002/mp.13552. Epub 2019 May 6.
6
Automated Field-In-Field (FIF) Plan Framework Combining Scripting Application Programming Interface and User-Executed Program for Breast Forward IMRT.结合脚本应用程序编程接口和用户执行程序的用于乳腺正向调强放疗的自动野中野(FIF)计划框架
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818810391. doi: 10.1177/1533033818810391.
7
Technical Note: Use of automation to eliminate shift errors.技术说明:使用自动化消除轮班错误。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Mar;21(3):192-195. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12830. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
8
Combining automatic plan integrity check (APIC) with standard plan document and checklist method to reduce errors in treatment planning.将自动计划完整性检查(APIC)与标准计划文档及清单方法相结合,以减少治疗计划中的错误。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Sep;21(9):124-133. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12981. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
9
Automation of Monte Carlo-based treatment plan verification for proton therapy.基于蒙特卡罗的质子治疗计划验证自动化。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Aug;21(8):131-138. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12923. Epub 2020 May 26.
10
Advanced automated treatment planning for total body irradiation: Implementation and effects on standardization.
Phys Med. 2023 Aug;112:102623. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102623. Epub 2023 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Mitigation of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Errors on the Novel RefleXion X1 System Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Within Six Sigma Framework.在六西格玛框架内使用失效模式与效应分析减轻新型RefleXion X1系统上的调强放射治疗和立体定向体部放射治疗治疗计划误差
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jan 26;8(5):101186. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101186. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
2
Optimised conformal total body irradiation: a heterogeneous practice, so where next?优化的适形全身照射:一种多样化的实践,那么下一步在哪里?
Br J Radiol. 2023 Mar 1;96(1144):20220650. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220650. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
3

本文引用的文献

1
AAPM Task Group 329: Reference dose specification for dose calculations: Dose-to-water or dose-to-muscle?AAPM 工作组 329:剂量计算的参考剂量规范:水剂量还是肌肉剂量?
Med Phys. 2020 Mar;47(3):e52-e64. doi: 10.1002/mp.13995. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic?自动化治疗计划能否在临床实践中得到应用?
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Aug;20(8):29-35. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12674. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning.自动化放疗计划。
Automation and integration of a novel restricted single-isocenter stereotactic body radiotherapy (a-RESIST) method for synchronous two lung lesions.
新型受限单中心立体定向体放射治疗(a-RESIST)同步治疗两肺病变的自动化与整合。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jul;22(7):56-65. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13259. Epub 2021 May 25.
4
A Probability-Based Investigation on the Setup Robustness of Pencil-beam Proton Radiation Therapy for Skull-Base Meningioma.基于概率的颅底脑膜瘤笔形束质子放射治疗设置稳健性研究
Int J Part Ther. 2021 Jan 28;7(3):34-45. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00009.1. eCollection 2021 Winter.
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul;29(3):209-218. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.02.003.
4
Automated Closed- and Open-Loop Validation of Knowledge-Based Planning Routines Across Multiple Disease Sites.基于知识的规划例程在多个疾病部位的自动闭环和开环验证。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul-Aug;9(4):257-265. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
5
Evaluation of an Automated Proton Planning Solution.自动质子治疗计划解决方案的评估
Cureus. 2018 Dec 6;10(12):e3696. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3696.
6
[Impact of DVH Outliers Registered in Knowledge-based Planning on Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Planning for Prostate Cancer].[基于知识的计划中记录的剂量体积直方图异常值对前列腺癌容积调强弧形治疗计划的影响]
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2019;75(2):151-159. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2019_JSRT_75.2.151.
7
Multi-Institutional Validation of a Knowledge-Based Planning Model for Patients Enrolled in RTOG 0617: Implications for Plan Quality Controls in Cooperative Group Trials.多机构验证 RTOG 0617 入组患者基于知识的计划模型:对合作组试验中计划质量控制的影响。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Mar;9(2):e218-e227. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
8
Implementation and operation of incident learning across a newly-created health system.在一个新创建的卫生系统中实施和开展事件学习
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Nov;19(6):298-305. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12447. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
9
Influence of Total Body Irradiation Dose Rate on Idiopathic Pneumonia Syndrome in Acute Leukemia Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.全身照射剂量率对接受异基因造血细胞移植的急性白血病患者特发性肺炎综合征的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jan 1;103(1):180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
10
Are we making an impact with incident learning systems? Analysis of quality improvement interventions using total body irradiation as a model system.我们是否通过事件学习系统产生了影响?以全身放射治疗为模型系统的质量改进干预措施的分析。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov-Dec;7(6):418-424. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 6.