• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高特质焦虑个体对愤怒和厌恶的负性面孔进行跨模态选择性注意偏向的机制。

Mechanisms of cross-modal selective attentional bias for negative faces of anger and disgust in high-trait anxiety individuals.

机构信息

Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition and School of Psychology, Capital Normal University.

Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Neuroreport. 2020 Aug 12;31(12):879-884. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001455.

DOI:10.1097/WNR.0000000000001455
PMID:32427804
Abstract

Research reveals that selective attentional bias to socially negative information is a reliable characteristic of individuals with high-trait anxiety (HTA). However, for selective attentional bias across sensory channels (visual and auditory), the interaction between attentional bias type and negative face type remains unclear. In this study, we recruited 30 individuals with high- and low-trait anxiety (LTA) (15 in each group), and measured their engagement and disengagement bias indices using the cross-modal attentional-probe paradigm, and measured the occipital P1 component using a 64-channel electroencephalography system. The results showed that under the engagement condition in the HTA group, the occipital P1 amplitude of an angry face was smaller than that of a neutral face, and there also exhibited smaller attentional bias indices of angry faces in the HTA group than that of the LTA group. For the presence of disgusted faces, the attentional bias indices of the HTA group were smaller than that of the LTA group under the disengagement condition. These findings demonstrate that the selective attentional bias occurs both in the engagement and the disengagement facets within the cross modal. There is a feature of facilitated attentional engagement bias for an angry face, and a feature of promoted attentional disengagement bias for a disgusted face in HTA individuals.

摘要

研究表明,对社会负面信息的选择性注意偏向是高特质焦虑(HTA)个体的一个可靠特征。然而,对于跨感觉通道(视觉和听觉)的选择性注意偏向,注意偏向类型和负性面孔类型之间的相互作用尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们招募了 30 名高特质焦虑(HTA)和低特质焦虑(LTA)个体(每组 15 名),并使用跨模态注意探针范式测量了他们的参与和脱离注意偏向指数,同时使用 64 通道脑电图系统测量了枕部 P1 成分。结果表明,在 HTA 组的参与条件下,愤怒面孔的枕部 P1 振幅小于中性面孔,并且 HTA 组对愤怒面孔的注意偏向指数也小于 LTA 组。对于厌恶面孔的存在,在脱离条件下,HTA 组的注意偏向指数小于 LTA 组。这些发现表明,选择性注意偏向既发生在跨模态的参与阶段,也发生在脱离阶段。在 HTA 个体中,存在对愤怒面孔的注意参与偏向促进特征,以及对厌恶面孔的注意脱离偏向促进特征。

相似文献

1
Mechanisms of cross-modal selective attentional bias for negative faces of anger and disgust in high-trait anxiety individuals.高特质焦虑个体对愤怒和厌恶的负性面孔进行跨模态选择性注意偏向的机制。
Neuroreport. 2020 Aug 12;31(12):879-884. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001455.
2
Mechanisms of attentional selection bias for threatening emotions of anger and disgust in individuals with high-trait anxiety.高特质焦虑个体对愤怒和厌恶等威胁性情绪的注意选择偏向机制。
Neuroreport. 2018 Mar 7;29(4):291-300. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000953.
3
Furious snarling: Teeth-exposure and anxiety-related attentional bias towards angry faces.愤怒的咆哮:对愤怒面孔的牙齿暴露和焦虑相关注意力偏向。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0207695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207695. eCollection 2018.
4
Physical aggression and attentional bias to angry faces: An event related potential study.身体攻击与对愤怒面孔的注意力偏向:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2019 Nov 15;1723:146387. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146387. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
5
Difficulty in disengaging attention from threatening facial expressions in anxiety: a new approach in terms of benefits.焦虑中难以从威胁性面部表情中转移注意力:从收益角度的新方法。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;45(1):203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
6
Time course of attentional bias in social anxiety: The effects of spatial frequencies and individual threats.社交焦虑中注意力偏向的时程变化:空间频率和个体威胁的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Sep;57(9):e13617. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13617. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
7
Attentional bias towards angry faces in childhood anxiety disorders.儿童焦虑障碍中对愤怒面孔的注意力偏向。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;41(2):158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
8
Attentional bias towards angry faces is moderated by the activation of a social processing mode in the general population.一般人群中,对愤怒面孔的注意力偏向受社会加工模式激活的调节。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Nov;33(7):1317-1329. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1561423. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
9
Attentional Bias towards Positive Emotion Predicts Stress Resilience.对积极情绪的注意偏向预测压力恢复力。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 23;11(3):e0148368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148368. eCollection 2016.
10
Neurophysiological correlates of attentional bias for emotional faces in socially anxious individuals - Evidence from a visual search task and N2pc.社交焦虑个体对情绪面孔注意偏向的神经生理关联——来自视觉搜索任务和N2pc的证据
Biol Psychol. 2018 Feb;132:192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Negative rumination in depression subtypes with melancholic features and anxious distress.伴有抑郁特征和焦虑痛苦的抑郁症亚型中的消极反刍思维。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 13;16:1515500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1515500. eCollection 2025.
2
Electrophysiological correlates of attentional bias towards threat in children with high levels of social anxiety.社交焦虑水平较高的儿童对威胁的注意偏向的电生理相关性。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Feb;23(1):190-202. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01042-8. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
3
Neural responses associated with attentional engagement and disengagement from threat in high socially anxious children: Evidence from temporal-spatial PCA.
与高社交焦虑儿童的威胁注意投入和脱离相关的神经反应:来自时-空 PCA 的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0261172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261172. eCollection 2022.