• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦虑中难以从威胁性面部表情中转移注意力:从收益角度的新方法。

Difficulty in disengaging attention from threatening facial expressions in anxiety: a new approach in terms of benefits.

机构信息

PSITEC laboratory, University Lille Nord de France - UDL3, France.

出版信息

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;45(1):203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.10.007
PMID:24239586
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recent work suggests that the ability to disengage attention from threatening information is impaired in anxiety. The present study compared the difficulty to disengage from angry, fearful and neutral faces in Low Trait Anxious individuals (LTA) versus High Trait Anxious individuals (HTA) at two stages of facial expression processing (i.e., initial and later face processing).

METHODS

HTA and LTA individuals performed an attentional shifting task to assess attentional disengagement. Participants had to classify a peripheral target letter, appearing 200 or 500 ms after a face was displayed.

RESULTS

LTA individuals were quicker when the letter appears after 500 ms compared to 200 ms regardless of the emotion of the face. An impaired disengagement in HTA individuals was observed for fearful and angry faces (i.e., no reaction differences between 200 and 500 ms) but not for neutral faces. These results suggest that it is particularly difficult for anxious individuals to switch attention from one stimulus to another if the engaged stimulus is a threatening face.

LIMITATIONS

Generalisation of our results is restricted to trait anxiety and emotional facial expression processing.

CONCLUSIONS

LTA individuals can benefit from the emotional processing (i.e., from 200 to 500 ms) to make a rapid attentional shift and engagement to the target stimuli whereas HTA individuals did not and continue to process the threatening facial expression. These results also point out the role of top down processes on the regulation of disengagement from threatening information in anxiety.

摘要

背景与目的

最近的研究表明,焦虑个体在从威胁性信息中转移注意力的能力上存在缺陷。本研究比较了低特质焦虑个体(LTA)和高特质焦虑个体(HTA)在面部表情处理的两个阶段(即初始阶段和后期阶段)中,从愤怒、恐惧和中性面孔中转移注意力的难度。

方法

HTA 和 LTA 个体执行了一项注意转移任务,以评估注意力的脱离。参与者必须在面孔呈现后 200 或 500 毫秒后对周边目标字母进行分类。

结果

无论面孔的情绪如何,LTA 个体在字母出现在 500 毫秒后比出现在 200 毫秒时更快。HTA 个体在面对恐惧和愤怒面孔时表现出注意力脱离困难(即,在 200 和 500 毫秒之间没有反应差异),但在面对中性面孔时没有。这些结果表明,对于焦虑个体来说,如果被吸引的刺激是威胁性面孔,那么将注意力从一个刺激转移到另一个刺激尤其困难。

局限性

我们的研究结果仅限于特质焦虑和情绪面部表情处理的推广。

结论

LTA 个体可以从情绪处理(即 200 到 500 毫秒)中受益,从而快速将注意力转移并专注于目标刺激,而 HTA 个体则没有,并且继续处理威胁性面部表情。这些结果还指出了自上而下的过程在焦虑中对威胁性信息脱离的调节作用。

相似文献

1
Difficulty in disengaging attention from threatening facial expressions in anxiety: a new approach in terms of benefits.焦虑中难以从威胁性面部表情中转移注意力:从收益角度的新方法。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;45(1):203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
2
The time course of attentional disengagement from angry faces in social anxiety.社交焦虑中对愤怒面孔注意力解除的时程。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;42(1):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
3
Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance.高特质焦虑中对威胁的注意偏向成分:促进性参与、脱逸受损和注意回避。
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Dec;44(12):1757-71. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.011. Epub 2006 Feb 14.
4
Orienting and maintenance of attention to threatening facial expressions in anxiety--an eye movement study.焦虑中对威胁性面部表情的定向和维持注意力——一项眼动研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 15;220(1-2):362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
5
Fearful faces modulate looking duration and attention disengagement in 7-month-old infants.恐惧的面孔会调节7个月大婴儿的注视时长和注意力脱离。
Dev Sci. 2008 Jan;11(1):60-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00659.x.
6
Attentional bias to angry faces using the dot-probe task? It depends when you look for it.使用点探测任务时对愤怒面孔的注意偏向?这取决于你何时去寻找它。
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Sep;44(9):1321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.004.
7
Attentional bias in anxiety: a behavioral and ERP study.焦虑中的注意偏向:一项行为与事件相关电位研究。
Brain Cogn. 2005 Oct;59(1):11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.03.005.
8
Different stages in attentional processing of facial expressions of pain: a dot-probe task modification.不同阶段的面部表情疼痛的注意力处理:一个点探测任务的修改。
J Pain. 2013 Mar;14(3):223-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.11.001. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
9
Focus on the positive: anxiety modulates the effects of emotional stimuli on hemispheric attention.关注积极面:焦虑调节情绪刺激对半球注意的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2013 Oct;83(1):52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
10
Sustained visual attention for competing emotional stimuli in social anxiety: An eye tracking study.社交焦虑中对竞争性情绪刺激的持续视觉注意力:一项眼动追踪研究。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;54:178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of a Single-Session Electrodermal Biofeedback Intervention for State Anxiety.单次皮电生物反馈干预治疗状态焦虑的可行性
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s10484-025-09720-2.
2
The role of state and trait anxiety in the processing of facial expressions of emotion.状态焦虑和特质焦虑在情绪面部表情加工中的作用。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jan 5;9(1):210056. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210056. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
Emotional Contrast and Psychological Function Impact Response Inhibition to Threatening Faces.
情绪对比和心理功能对威胁面孔的反应抑制产生影响。
Motiv Emot. 2018 Dec;42(6):920-930. doi: 10.1007/s11031-018-9709-z. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
4
Early development of attention to threat-related facial expressions.注意与威胁相关的面部表情的早期发展。
PLoS One. 2018 May 16;13(5):e0197424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197424. eCollection 2018.
5
Deadly Attraction - Attentional Bias toward Preferred Cigarette Brand in Smokers.致命吸引力——吸烟者对偏好香烟品牌的注意偏向
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 11;8:1365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01365. eCollection 2017.
6
State anxiety and emotional face recognition in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者的状态焦虑与情绪面孔识别
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 May 31;4(5):160855. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160855. eCollection 2017 May.