• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于图像的经济型热带木材评估的无参考质量评估。

No-reference quality assessment for image-based assessment of economically important tropical woods.

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

School of Mechatronic Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau, Malaysia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 May 19;15(5):e0233320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233320. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0233320
PMID:32428043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7236984/
Abstract

Image Quality Assessment (IQA) is essential for the accuracy of systems for automatic recognition of tree species for wood samples. In this study, a No-Reference IQA (NR-IQA), wood NR-IQA (WNR-IQA) metric was proposed to assess the quality of wood images. Support Vector Regression (SVR) was trained using Generalized Gaussian Distribution (GGD) and Asymmetric Generalized Gaussian Distribution (AGGD) features, which were measured for wood images. Meanwhile, the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) was obtained from the subjective evaluation. This was followed by a comparison between the proposed IQA metric, WNR-IQA, and three established NR-IQA metrics, namely Blind/Referenceless Image Spatial Quality Evaluator (BRISQUE), deepIQA, Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networks (DB-CNN), and five Full Reference-IQA (FR-IQA) metrics known as MSSIM, SSIM, FSIM, IWSSIM, and GMSD. The proposed WNR-IQA metric, BRISQUE, deepIQA, DB-CNN, and FR-IQAs were then compared with MOS values to evaluate the performance of the automatic IQA metrics. As a result, the WNR-IQA metric exhibited a higher performance compared to BRISQUE, deepIQA, DB-CNN, and FR-IQA metrics. Highest quality images may not be routinely available due to logistic factors, such as dust, poor illumination, and hot environment present in the timber industry. Moreover, motion blur could occur due to the relative motion between the camera and the wood slice. Therefore, the advantage of WNR-IQA could be seen from its independency from a "perfect" reference image for the image quality evaluation.

摘要

图像质量评估(IQA)对于树木品种自动识别系统的准确性至关重要。在这项研究中,提出了一种无参考图像质量评估(NR-IQA),即木材无参考图像质量评估(WNR-IQA)指标,用于评估木材图像的质量。使用广义高斯分布(GGD)和非对称广义高斯分布(AGGD)特征训练支持向量回归(SVR),这些特征是针对木材图像测量的。同时,从主观评估中获得平均意见得分(MOS)。然后,将提出的 IQA 指标、WNR-IQA 与三种已建立的 NR-IQA 指标,即盲/无参考图像空间质量评估器(BRISQUE)、深度 IQA、深度双线性卷积神经网络(DB-CNN),以及五种全参考-IQA(FR-IQA)指标,即 MSSIM、SSIM、FSIM、IWSSIM 和 GMSD 进行比较。然后,将提出的 WNR-IQA 指标、BRISQUE、深度 IQA、DB-CNN 和 FR-IQA 与 MOS 值进行比较,以评估自动 IQA 指标的性能。结果表明,WNR-IQA 指标的性能优于 BRISQUE、深度 IQA、DB-CNN 和 FR-IQA 指标。由于物流因素,例如木材工业中存在的灰尘、照明不佳和高温环境,可能无法常规获得高质量的图像。此外,由于相机和木材切片之间的相对运动,可能会出现运动模糊。因此,WNR-IQA 的优势在于其在图像质量评估中独立于“完美”参考图像。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/e54c55454be9/pone.0233320.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/be052242daad/pone.0233320.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/0d8a52cafaba/pone.0233320.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/e3412e2dedb4/pone.0233320.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/6ac6b18bd11e/pone.0233320.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/5102e9411837/pone.0233320.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/9e7d22de30ec/pone.0233320.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/4dcb465c9151/pone.0233320.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/e54c55454be9/pone.0233320.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/be052242daad/pone.0233320.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/0d8a52cafaba/pone.0233320.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/e3412e2dedb4/pone.0233320.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/6ac6b18bd11e/pone.0233320.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/5102e9411837/pone.0233320.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/9e7d22de30ec/pone.0233320.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/4dcb465c9151/pone.0233320.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aec/7236984/e54c55454be9/pone.0233320.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
No-reference quality assessment for image-based assessment of economically important tropical woods.基于图像的经济型热带木材评估的无参考质量评估。
PLoS One. 2020 May 19;15(5):e0233320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233320. eCollection 2020.
2
Modified-BRISQUE as no reference image quality assessment for structural MR images.改进型BRISQUE用于结构磁共振图像的无参考图像质量评估。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Nov;43:74-87. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
3
Blind Deep S3D Image Quality Evaluation via Local to Global Feature Aggregation.基于局部到全局特征聚合的盲景深 S3D 图像质量评价。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017 Oct;26(10):4923-4936. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2725584. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
4
Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.磁共振(MR)图像主观与客观评估之间的相关性
Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jul;34(6):820-831. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
5
Applicability Evaluation of Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Methods for Computed Tomography Images.全参考图像质量评估方法在计算机断层扫描图像中的适用性评估。
J Digit Imaging. 2023 Dec;36(6):2623-2634. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00875-0. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
6
Medical Image Quality Assessment Using CSO Based Deep Neural Network.基于 CSO 的深度神经网络的医学图像质量评估。
J Med Syst. 2018 Oct 5;42(11):224. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1089-0.
7
Evaluation of motion artifacts in brain magnetic resonance images using convolutional neural network-based prediction of full-reference image quality assessment metrics.基于卷积神经网络的全参考图像质量评估指标预测对脑磁共振图像中运动伪影的评估
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2022 Jan;9(1):015502. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.1.015502. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
8
No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain.空间域无参考图像质量评估。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012 Dec;21(12):4695-708. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2012.2214050. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
9
FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment.FSIM:一种用于图像质量评估的特征相似性指数。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2011 Aug;20(8):2378-86. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2011.2109730. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
10
Application-Driven No-Reference Quality Assessment for Dermoscopy Images With Multiple Distortions.针对具有多种失真的皮肤镜图像的应用驱动型无参考质量评估
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Jun;63(6):1248-56. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2493580. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
No-reference image quality assessment based on global awareness.基于全局感知的无参考图像质量评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 7;19(10):e0310206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310206. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment.深度神经网络在无参考和全参考图像质量评估中的应用。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018 Jan;27(1):206-219. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2760518. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
2
Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.磁共振(MR)图像主观与客观评估之间的相关性
Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jul;34(6):820-831. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
3
Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index.
梯度幅度相似性偏差:一种高效的感知图像质量指数。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2014 Feb;23(2):684-95. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2013.2293423.
4
No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain.空间域无参考图像质量评估。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012 Dec;21(12):4695-708. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2012.2214050. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
5
FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment.FSIM:一种用于图像质量评估的特征相似性指数。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2011 Aug;20(8):2378-86. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2011.2109730. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
6
Information content weighting for perceptual image quality assessment.信息内容加权感知图像质量评估。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2011 May;20(5):1185-98. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2092435. Epub 2010 Nov 15.