Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan Injury Prevention Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Michigan Youth Violence Prevention Center, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):386-393. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 May 16.
Youth who carry firearms-and peers that surround them-are at increased risk for violent injuries. Because firearm carriage behaviors can change over time within an individual, it is important to identify individual and social-contextual determinants that explain this within-person variability in carriage.
The authors identified individual and social-contextual determinants of firearm carriage in the past 6 months using multilevel logistic models on 5 waves of panel data from the Flint Youth Injury Study (n=597; ages 14-24 years), collected in 2009-2011 and analyzed in 2019.
Regarding within-person effects, when an individual had more positive peer affiliations than their average, their odds of carrying a firearm decreased (OR=0.88; 95% CI=0.81, 0.96). Conversely, an individual's odds of carrying a firearm increased when they had more negative peer affiliations (OR=1.08, 95% CI=1.02, 1.14), experienced more victimization (OR=1.03, 95% CI=1.01, 1.05), perceived greater community violence (OR=1.12, 95% CI=1.05, 1.21), or exhibited greater retaliatory attitudes (OR=1.10, 95% CI=1.01, 1.19) than their average.
Peer affiliations, victimization, community violence perceptions, and retaliatory attitudes explain within-person variability in firearm carriage. Strategies for reducing carriage among youth should consider individual- and environmental-level interventions to address these individual and social-contextual determinants.
携带枪支的青少年及其周围的同伴面临更高的暴力伤害风险。由于个体内部的枪支携带行为可能随时间而变化,因此重要的是要确定解释个体内部枪支携带变化的个体和社会背景决定因素。
作者使用多层次逻辑模型,根据 2009-2011 年期间收集并于 2019 年分析的弗林特青年伤害研究(n=597;年龄 14-24 岁)的 5 波面板数据,确定了过去 6 个月内携带枪支的个体和社会背景决定因素。
就个体内效应而言,当个体与同伴的正面联系比平均水平更多时,他们携带枪支的几率降低(OR=0.88;95%CI=0.81,0.96)。相反,当个体与同伴的负面联系更多(OR=1.08,95%CI=1.02,1.14)、经历更多的受害(OR=1.03,95%CI=1.01,1.05)、感知更多的社区暴力(OR=1.12,95%CI=1.05,1.21)或表现出更强的报复态度(OR=1.10,95%CI=1.01,1.19)时,他们携带枪支的几率增加。
同伴关系、受害情况、对社区暴力的认知和报复态度解释了枪支携带的个体内变异性。减少青少年携带枪支的策略应考虑个体和环境层面的干预措施,以解决这些个体和社会背景决定因素。