• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线报销申请系统对爱尔兰共和国5%利多卡因药用贴剂处方的影响。

Effect of an Online Reimbursement Application System on Prescribing of Lidocaine 5% Medicated Plaster in the Republic of Ireland.

作者信息

Smith Amelia, Doran Stephen, Daly Maria, Kennedy Cormac, Barry Michael

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.

Medicines Management Programme, Health Service Executive, St. James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00586-5.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-020-00586-5
PMID:32430656
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The lidocaine 5% medicated plaster, Versatis, has one therapeutic indication listed on the Summary of Product Characteristics-symptomatic relief of post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) in adults. Increased expenditure on Versatis suggests that there is considerable off-label use. To support the appropriate use of Versatis, the Health Service Executive's Primary Care Reimbursement Service (PCRS) introduced a reimbursement application system for Versatis from 1 September 2017.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of introducing a reimbursement application system on Versatis prescribing under the General Medical Services (GMS) scheme.

METHODS

This study was carried out using prescription dispensing data from the PCRS pharmacy claims database. We carried out segmented linear regression to assess changes in the Versatis prescribing rate per 1000 GMS eligible population, before and after the introduction of the online reimbursement application system.

RESULTS

The results of the segmented regression analysis show that there was a statistically significant level (- 4.91, p < 0.001) and trend change (- 0.69, p < 0.001) in the rate of Versatis prescribing post-introduction of the reimbursement application system. In the year prior to the introduction of the system, 2016, the annual GMS expenditure on Versatis lidocaine 5% patches was over €27 million, whereas the GMS expenditure in 2018 was reduced to just over €2 million.

CONCLUSION

In our study, a substantial decrease in the dispensing of Versatis was seen after the implementation of a reimbursement application system. Prescribing of Versatis should be restricted to patients with a diagnosis of PHN not only to reduce costs, but to ensure evidence-based use of this medication.

摘要

背景

5%利多卡因药用贴剂(Versatis)在其产品特性摘要中列出了一项治疗适应症——缓解成人疱疹后神经痛(PHN)的症状。Versatis支出的增加表明存在大量的超适应症使用情况。为支持Versatis的合理使用,卫生服务执行局的初级医疗报销服务(PCRS)从2017年9月1日起引入了Versatis报销申请系统。

目的

本研究的目的是调查引入报销申请系统对一般医疗服务(GMS)计划下Versatis处方开具的影响。

方法

本研究使用了PCRS药房报销数据库中的处方配药数据。我们进行了分段线性回归,以评估在线报销申请系统引入前后每1000名符合GMS资格人群中Versatis处方开具率的变化。

结果

分段回归分析结果显示,报销申请系统引入后,Versatis处方开具率存在统计学显著水平(-4.91,p<0.001)和趋势变化(-0.69,p<0.001)。在该系统引入前的2016年,GMS每年在5%利多卡因Versatis贴剂上的支出超过2700万欧元,而2018年GMS的支出降至略高于200万欧元。

结论

在我们的研究中,实施报销申请系统后,Versatis的配药量大幅下降。Versatis的处方应仅限于诊断为PHN的患者,这不仅是为了降低成本,也是为了确保该药物的循证使用。

相似文献

1
Effect of an Online Reimbursement Application System on Prescribing of Lidocaine 5% Medicated Plaster in the Republic of Ireland.在线报销申请系统对爱尔兰共和国5%利多卡因药用贴剂处方的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00586-5.
2
5% lidocaine medicated plaster in elderly patients with postherpetic neuralgia: results of a compassionate use programme in France.5% 利多卡因贴剂治疗老年带状疱疹后神经痛患者:法国同情用药项目的结果。
Drugs Aging. 2011 Sep 1;28(9):693-702. doi: 10.2165/11595600-000000000-00000.
3
The impact of lidocaine plaster prescribing reduction strategies: A comparison of two national health services in Europe.利多卡因贴剂处方减少策略的影响:欧洲两个国家卫生服务的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Aug;89(8):2349-2358. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15779. Epub 2023 May 31.
4
Lidocaine 5% medicated plaster: a review of its use in postherpetic neuralgia.利多卡因 5% 贴膏:在带状疱疹后神经痛中的应用评价。
Drugs. 2009 Oct 22;69(15):2149-65. doi: 10.2165/11203220-000000000-00000.
5
5% lidocaine medicated plaster versus pregabalin in post-herpetic neuralgia and diabetic polyneuropathy: an open-label, non-inferiority two-stage RCT study.5%利多卡因药用贴剂与普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后神经痛和糖尿病性多发性神经病的开放标签、非劣效性两阶段随机对照试验研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jul;25(7):1663-76. doi: 10.1185/03007990903047880.
6
Cost effectiveness of a lidocaine 5% medicated plaster compared with pregabalin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in the UK: a Markov model analysis.与普瑞巴林相比,利多卡因 5%贴剂治疗英国带状疱疹后神经痛的成本效果:一项马尔可夫模型分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(2):71-87. doi: 10.2165/11533310-000000000-00000.
7
Efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster in comparison with pregabalin in patients with postherpetic neuralgia and diabetic polyneuropathy: interim analysis from an open-label, two-stage adaptive, randomized, controlled trial.5%利多卡因( lignocaine )药用贴剂与普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后神经痛和糖尿病性多发性神经病患者的疗效及安全性比较:一项开放标签、两阶段适应性、随机对照试验的中期分析
Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29(4):231-41. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200929040-00002.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster compared with pregabalin for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia in China.与普瑞巴林相比,5%利多卡因贴剂治疗中国带状疱疹后神经痛的成本效果分析。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;10(4):4493-4501. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-529. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
9
Cost containment interventions introduced on the community drugs schemes in Ireland-evaluation of expenditure trends using a national prescription claims database.爱尔兰社区毒品计划中引入的成本控制干预措施——使用国家处方报销数据库评估支出趋势。
Clin Ther. 2012 Mar;34(3):632-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.01.025. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
10
The implications of regional and national demographic projections for future GMS costs in Ireland through to 2026.到2026年爱尔兰地区和国家人口预测对未来全科医疗服务(GMS)成本的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 21;14:477. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-477.

引用本文的文献

1
Core medication use in general practice prescriptions: A pilot study evaluating the Drug Utilization 90% Index in Irish general practice.全科医疗处方中的核心药物使用情况:一项评估爱尔兰全科医疗中药物利用90%指数的试点研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Apr;91(4):1241-1249. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16356. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
2
Utilising Health Technology Assessment to Develop Managed Access Protocols to Facilitate Drug Reimbursement in Ireland.利用卫生技术评估制定管理准入协议,以促进爱尔兰的药物报销。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Nov;22(6):771-781. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00904-1. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
3
Health technology management: the experience of a managed access approach to the reimbursement of dupilumab in Ireland.
健康技术管理:爱尔兰管理准入途径报销度普利尤单抗的经验。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;192(6):2829-2837. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03378-7. Epub 2023 May 9.
4
Opioid and analgesic utilization in Ireland in 2000 and 2015: A repeated cross-sectional study.2000 年和 2015 年爱尔兰阿片类药物和镇痛药的使用情况:一项重复的横断面研究。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022 Jan;10(1):e00899. doi: 10.1002/prp2.899.