Suppr超能文献

病例汇报方法:在对照环境下,一分钟导师制与 SNAPPS 的随机对照试验。

Case presentation methods: a randomized controlled trial of the one-minute preceptor versus SNAPPS in a controlled setting.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Aug;9(4):245-250. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00588-y.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

One-minute preceptor (OMP) and SNAPPS (a mnemonic for Summarize history and findings; Narrow the differential; Analyze the differential; Probe the preceptor about uncertainties; Plan management; and Select case-related issues for self-study) are educational techniques developed to promote learners' expression of clinical reasoning during the case presentation in the workplace. The aim of this present study was to compare the content of the case presentation between the SNAPPS and the OMP methods.

METHODS

This was a randomized controlled trial comparing SNAPPS and OMP in 60 medical students at the beginning of their fifth year of medical school. After an introduction session, students presented and discussed two cases based on real patients and provided in written format. All case presentations were recorded and evaluated by two researchers. The assessed elements of the case presentations were divided into three subgroups related to expression of clinical reasoning, time and initiative to guide the presentation.

RESULTS

There were 30 participants in each group. There was no difference in the expression of clinical reasoning between OMP and SNAPPS groups (number of differential diagnoses, justification of most likely diagnosis and differential diagnosis, expression of comparing and contrasting hypotheses). However, students in the SNAPPS group expressed significantly more questions and uncertainties (p < 0.001), and more often took the initiative to present and justify the most likely diagnosis, differential diagnosis and management plan than students in the OMP group, both in simple and complex cases (all p values <0.001) without extending the length of the teaching session.

CONCLUSION

OMP and SNAPPS equally promote medical students' expression of clinical reasoning. The SNAPPS technique was more effective than the OMP technique in helping students to take on an active role during case presentation. We propose SNAPPS as an effective learning tool, engaging students and promoting the expression of their clinical reasoning as part of a case presentation.

摘要

简介

一分钟导师(OMP)和 SNAPPS(一个用于总结病史和发现;缩小鉴别范围;分析鉴别范围;向导师询问不确定之处;计划管理;选择与病例相关的问题进行自学的助记符)是为了促进学习者在工作场所的病例呈现中表达临床推理而开发的教育技术。本研究的目的是比较 SNAPPS 和 OMP 方法在病例呈现中的内容。

方法

这是一项随机对照试验,比较了医学五年级学生中的 60 名学生的 SNAPPS 和 OMP。在介绍会议后,学生根据真实患者呈现并讨论了两个案例,并以书面形式提供。所有病例呈现均由两名研究人员记录和评估。病例呈现的评估要素分为与表达临床推理、指导呈现的时间和主动性相关的三个亚组。

结果

每组有 30 名参与者。在表达临床推理方面,OMP 和 SNAPPS 组之间没有差异(鉴别诊断的数量、最可能诊断和鉴别诊断的理由、比较和对比假设的表达)。然而,SNAPPS 组的学生表达了更多的问题和不确定性(p<0.001),并且比 OMP 组的学生更主动地呈现和证明最可能的诊断、鉴别诊断和管理计划,无论是在简单病例还是复杂病例中(所有 p 值均<0.001),而不会延长教学时间。

结论

OMP 和 SNAPPS 同样促进医学生表达临床推理。与 OMP 技术相比,SNAPPS 技术在帮助学生在病例呈现中发挥积极作用方面更有效。我们建议将 SNAPPS 作为一种有效的学习工具,让学生参与并促进他们在病例呈现中表达临床推理。

相似文献

2
Effects of SNAPPS in clinical reasoning teaching: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Mar 7;11(3):220-230. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0149. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
5
Student uncertainties drive teaching during case presentations: more so with SNAPPS.
Acad Med. 2012 Sep;87(9):1210-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182628fa4.
6
One-minute preceptor and SNAPPS for clinical reasoning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Intern Med J. 2023 May;53(5):680-689. doi: 10.1111/imj.16005. Epub 2023 May 5.
7
8
A learner-centered technique and clinical reasoning, reflection, and case presentation attributes in athletic training students.
J Athl Train. 2013 May-Jun;48(3):362-71. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.2.17. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
One-Minute Preceptor, SNAPPS, and Traditional Teaching in the Acquisition of Clinical Reasoning Skills by Medical Students.
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 28;35(2):823-835. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02241-3. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
The ubiquity of uncertainty: a scoping review on how undergraduate health professions' students engage with uncertainty.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 Aug;26(3):913-958. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10028-z. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验