Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Sep;34(9):e23361. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23361. Epub 2020 May 20.
Multiparameter flow cytometry is the preferred method to determine immunophenotypic features of cells present in a wide variety of sample types. Standardization is key to avoid inconsistencies and subjectivity of interpretations between clinical diagnostic laboratories. Among these standardization requirements, synchronization between different flow cytometer instruments is indispensable to obtain comparable results. This study aimed to investigate whether two widely used flow cytometers, the FACSCanto II and LSRFortessa, can be effectively synchronized utilizing calibration bead-based synchronization.
Two FACSCanto II and two LSRFortessa flow cytometers were synchronized with both multicolor hard-dyed and single-fluorochrome-conjugated surface-dyed beads according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cell staining was performed on five whole-blood samples obtained from healthy controls and were analyzed upon synchronization with the respective synchronization protocols.
Comparability criteria (defined as <15% deviation from the reference instrument) were met with both bead sets when synchronizing different FACSCanto II or LSRFortessa instruments. However, we observed that the criteria could not be met when synchronizing FACSCanto II with LSRFortessa instruments with multicolor hard-dyed beads. By utilizing single-fluorochrome-conjugated surface-dyed beads to determine and adjust PMT voltages, the accepted comparability criteria were successfully met. The protocol has been validated using five different eight-parameter stained samples.
We show that FACSCanto II and LSRFortessa instruments can effectively be synchronized using single-fluorochrome-conjugated surface-dyed beads in case deviation criteria cannot be met using multicolor hard-dyed beads. Synchronization with single-fluorochrome-conjugated surface-dyed beads results in decreased deviations between instruments, allowing comparability criteria to become stricter.
多参数流式细胞术是确定各种样本类型中细胞免疫表型特征的首选方法。标准化是避免临床诊断实验室之间解释不一致和主观性的关键。在这些标准化要求中,不同流式细胞仪仪器之间的同步对于获得可比结果是必不可少的。本研究旨在探讨两种广泛使用的流式细胞仪,FACSCanto II 和 LSRFortessa,是否可以通过基于校准珠的同步有效地进行同步。
根据制造商的说明,使用多色硬染和单荧光素偶联表面染珠将两个 FACSCanto II 和两个 LSRFortessa 流式细胞仪进行同步。对来自健康对照者的五个全血样本进行细胞染色,并根据各自的同步方案进行分析。
当同步不同的 FACSCanto II 或 LSRFortessa 仪器时,两种珠子组都符合可比性标准(定义为与参考仪器的偏差<15%)。然而,我们观察到当使用多色硬染珠同步 FACSCanto II 与 LSRFortessa 仪器时,无法满足标准。通过使用单荧光素偶联表面染珠来确定和调整 PMT 电压,可以成功满足可接受的可比性标准。该方案已使用五个不同的八参数染色样本进行了验证。
我们表明,当使用多色硬染珠无法满足偏差标准时,FACSCanto II 和 LSRFortessa 仪器可以使用单荧光素偶联表面染珠有效地进行同步。使用单荧光素偶联表面染珠进行同步会降低仪器之间的偏差,从而使可比性标准更加严格。