Exploring the life death divide, questions remain long after the Harvard Criteria.
作者信息
Golder Barbara, Travaline Deacon John M, Dreger Sister Mary Diana
机构信息
Editor in Chief.
Executive Editor.
出版信息
Linacre Q. 2019 Nov;86(4):268-270. doi: 10.1177/0024363919877021. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Exploring the life death divide, questions remain long after the Harvard Criteria.探究生死界限，在哈佛标准提出很久之后，问题依然存在。
Linacre Q. 2019 Nov;86(4):268-270. doi: 10.1177/0024363919877021. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
2
A change of heart and a change of mind? Technology and the redefinition of death in 1968.内心的改变与观念的转变？1968年的技术与死亡的重新定义。
Soc Sci Med. 1997 May;44(10):1465-82. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00266-3.
3
Brain Death at Fifty: Exploring Consensus, Controversy, and Contexts.脑死亡五十载：共识、争议与背景探讨。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S2-S5. doi: 10.1002/hast.942.
4
All human death is brain death: The legacy of the Harvard criteria.所有的人类死亡都是脑死亡：哈佛标准的遗产。
Resuscitation. 2019 May;138:210-212. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
5
Diagnosis of death in comatose patients under resuscitation treatment: a critical review of the Harvard report.复苏治疗中昏迷患者的死亡诊断：对哈佛报告的批判性综述
Am J Law Med. 1976 Summer;2(1):1-40.
6
Applying the Harvard criteria.应用哈佛标准。
J Med Philos. 1979 Sep;4(3):232-3. doi: 10.1093/jmp/4.3.232.
7
Stuart Schreiber: biology from a chemist's perspective. Interview by Joanna Owens.斯图尔特·施赖伯：从化学家视角看生物学。乔安娜·欧文斯采访。
Drug Discov Today. 2004 Apr 1;9(7):299-303. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03063-6.
8
"He sees the development of children's concepts upon a background of sociology": Jean Piaget's honorary degree at Harvard University in 1936.“他从社会学背景出发看待儿童概念的发展”：让·皮亚杰1936年在哈佛大学获得的荣誉学位。
Hist Psychol. 2004 Feb;7(1):20-44. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.7.1.20.
9
The transatlantic divide over brain death determination and the debate.大西洋两岸在脑死亡判定上的分歧和争论。
Brain. 2012 Apr;135(Pt 4):1321-31. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr282. Epub 2011 Dec 24.
10
Harvard v. Canada: the myc mouse that still squeaks in the maze of biopatent law.哈佛诉加拿大：在生物专利法迷宫中仍吱吱作响的“myc”小鼠。
Acad Med. 2001 Jul;76(7):684-92. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200107000-00007.
引用本文的文献
1
The Catholic Medical Association Should Officially Oppose the Utilization of Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death in Clinical Practice.天主教医学协会应正式反对在临床实践中使用神经学标准来判定死亡。
Linacre Q. 2023 Feb;90(1):10-12. doi: 10.1177/00243639221107732. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
2
Implications of John Kavanaugh's Philosophy of the Human Person as Embodied Reflexive Consciousness for Conscientious Decision-making in Brain Death.约翰·卡瓦诺的“作为具身反思意识的人类哲学”对脑死亡中尽责决策的影响。
Linacre Q. 2021 Feb;88(1):71-81. doi: 10.1177/0024363920924876. Epub 2020 May 15.
Zotero 插件