• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑死亡五十载:共识、争议与背景探讨。

Brain Death at Fifty: Exploring Consensus, Controversy, and Contexts.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S2-S5. doi: 10.1002/hast.942.

DOI:10.1002/hast.942
PMID:30584863
Abstract

This special report is published in commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of the "Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death," a landmark document that proposed a new way to define death, with implications that advanced the field of organ transplantation. This remarkable success notwithstanding, the concept has raised lasting questions about what it means to be dead. Is death defined in terms of the biological failure of the organism to maintain integrated functioning? Can death be declared on the basis of severe neurological injury even when biological functions remain intact? Is death essentially a social construct that can be defined in different ways, based on human judgment? These issues, and more, are discussed and debated in this report by leading experts in the field, many of whom have been engaged with this topic for decades.

摘要

本特刊是为纪念《哈佛医学院特别委员会报告:脑死亡定义的研究》发表五十周年而出版的。该报告是一份具有里程碑意义的文献,提出了一种新的死亡定义方式,对器官移植领域产生了深远的影响。尽管取得了这一显著的成功,但该概念引发了关于死亡含义的持久问题。死亡是否可以定义为生物体无法维持整体功能的生物学衰竭?即使生物功能保持完整,能否基于严重的神经损伤来宣布死亡?死亡是否本质上是一种社会建构,可以根据人类判断以不同方式定义?本报告由该领域的权威专家进行了讨论和辩论,其中许多专家已经研究这个课题几十年了。

相似文献

1
Brain Death at Fifty: Exploring Consensus, Controversy, and Contexts.脑死亡五十载:共识、争议与背景探讨。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S2-S5. doi: 10.1002/hast.942.
2
Conceptual Issues in DCDD Donor Death Determination.在 DCDD 供体死亡判定中的概念性问题。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S26-S28. doi: 10.1002/hast.948.
3
The Dead Donor Rule as Policy Indoctrination.《死人捐赠规则:政策洗脑》
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S39-S42. doi: 10.1002/hast.952.
4
Would a Reasonable Person Now Accept the 1968 Harvard Brain Death Report? A Short History of Brain Death.现在会有理智的人接受 1968 年哈佛脑死亡报告吗?脑死亡简史。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S6-S9. doi: 10.1002/hast.943.
5
Beecher Dépassé: Fifty Years of Determining Death, Legally.比彻过时了:五十年来,法律上确定死亡的标准。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S14-S18. doi: 10.1002/hast.945.
6
DCDD Donors Are Not Dead.DCDD 供体未死亡。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S29-S32. doi: 10.1002/hast.949.
7
Brain Death: A Conclusion in Search of a Justification.脑死亡:一个寻求正当性的结论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S22-S25. doi: 10.1002/hast.947.
8
Reexamining the definition and criteria of death.重新审视死亡的定义和标准。
Semin Neurol. 1997;17(3):265-70. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1040938.
9
Controversies in the determination of death: perspectives from Switzerland.关于死亡判定的争议:来自瑞士的观点。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Aug 17;142:w13667. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13667. eCollection 2012.
10
History of brain death as death: 1968 to the present.脑死亡作为死亡判定标准的历史:1968年至今。
J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):673-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Curriculum Innovation: Teaching Neuroethics Through a Case-Based Undergraduate Medical Education Workshop: Implementation and Evaluation.课程创新:通过基于案例的本科医学教育工作坊教授神经伦理学:实施与评估
Neurol Educ. 2023 May 15;2(2):e200070. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200070. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Brain death: Controversies and reappraisals.脑死亡:争议与重新评估
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2024 Jun 12;23(1):e0168. doi: 10.1097/CLD.0000000000000168. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
3
"Death as the One Great Certainty": ethical implications of children with irreversible cardiorespiratory failure and dependence on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
“死亡乃唯一必然之事”:患有不可逆心肺功能衰竭且依赖体外膜肺氧合的儿童的伦理问题
Front Pediatr. 2024 Jan 11;11:1325207. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1325207. eCollection 2023.
4
Inconsistency between the Circulatory and the Brain Criteria of Death in the Uniform Determination of Death Act.《统一死亡判定法案》中循环系统与脑死亡判定标准之间的矛盾。
J Med Philos. 2023 Sep 14;48(5):422-433. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhad029.
5
Understanding Public Perspectives on Opt-Out Deceased Donor Transplant Policy: Ethically Obligatory and Practically Necessary.了解公众对退出式已故捐赠者移植政策的看法:道德上义不容辞且实际必要。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Nov;17(11):1577-1579. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11230922. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
6
Healthcare Professionals' Understandings of the Definition and Determination of Death: A Scoping Review.医疗保健专业人员对死亡定义和判定的理解:一项范围综述。
Transplant Direct. 2022 Mar 25;8(4):e1309. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001309. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Pediatric brain death certification: a narrative review.小儿脑死亡认证:一项叙述性综述。
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2738-2748. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-350.
8
Deceased Organ Transplantation in Bangladesh: The Dynamics of Bioethics, Religion and Culture.孟加拉国的已故器官移植:生物伦理学、宗教和文化的动态。
HEC Forum. 2022 Jun;34(2):139-167. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09436-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
9
The Moral Status of Organ Donation and Transplantation Within Islamic Law: The Council of North America's Position.伊斯兰法律中器官捐赠与移植的道德地位:北美委员会的立场。
Transplant Direct. 2020 Feb 18;6(3):e536. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000980. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
A Pot Ignored Boils On: Sustained Calls for Explicit Consent of Intimate Medical Exams.被忽视的问题持续存在:对亲密医学检查明确同意的持续呼吁。
HEC Forum. 2020 Jun;32(2):125-145. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09399-4.