Suppr超能文献

一款生育追踪应用的用户行为比较:自然计划生育方法培训能否提高持续性和使用率?

A Comparison of User Behaviors for a Fertility-Tracking App: Does Training in an NFP Method Improve Persistence and Use?

作者信息

Manhart Michael D

机构信息

Couple to Couple League, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Linacre Q. 2020 Feb;87(1):53-59. doi: 10.1177/0024363919870435. Epub 2019 Sep 13.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study explores differences in the use of CyclePro (CPG), a fertility-tracking app developed by Couple to Couple League (CCL), between those exposed to it as a part of natural family planning (NFP) instruction versus those who find it on their own. An anonymous data set of 17,543 CPG accounts opened between April 2013 and June 2016 was used for analysis. Nonmember users opened the most accounts (58 percent, = 10,134), CCL members represented 38 percent ( = 6,758) of new accounts, and 207 CCL teachers (4 percent) were using CPG for personal charting. Significantly more nonmember accounts had zero days of use after the initial opening compared to CCL member accounts (61 percent vs. 23 percent, respectively, χ = 2,405.9, < .001). Conversely, significantly more CCL member accounts were used for ninety days or longer than nonmember accounts (47 percent vs. 13 percent, respectively, χ = 2,404.2, < .001). CCL students-those who began using the app as part of a formal NFP teaching curriculum-were more likely to use the app for > six cycles compared to nonmembers. In accounts with at least one complete cycle, CCL students were the most diligent at daily recording (95 percent of cycle days with observation recorded) followed by CCL members (88 percent) and nonmembers (76 percent). CCL teachers had the lowest frequency of cycle days with a recorded observation (73 percent). Within each cohort, accounts with > six recorded cycles had a lower proportion of cycle days with an observation recorded, likely reflecting increasing knowledge of their personal fertility patterns. Long-term users who had no known formal training in NFP still had the lowest proportion cycle days with a fertility observation. We conclude formal NFP instruction increases the probability of long-term app use, and regardless of training, long-term users will likely record observations on about 70 percent of cycle days.

SUMMARY

"CyclePro™ users with NFP training were more persistent and diligent about daily data input than those without training."

摘要

未标注

本研究探讨了作为自然计划生育(NFP)指导一部分接触到生育追踪应用程序CyclePro(CPG)的人群与自行发现该应用程序的人群在使用上的差异。分析使用了2013年4月至2016年6月期间开设的17543个CPG账户的匿名数据集。非会员用户开设的账户最多(58%,即10134个),CCL会员占新账户的38%(即6758个),207名CCL教师(4%)将CPG用于个人记录。与CCL会员账户相比,初始开户后使用天数为零的非会员账户明显更多(分别为61%和23%,χ = 2405.9,P <.001)。相反,使用90天或更长时间的CCL会员账户明显多于非会员账户(分别为47%和13%,χ = 2404.2,P <.001)。CCL学生——那些作为正式NFP教学课程的一部分开始使用该应用程序的人——与非会员相比,更有可能使用该应用程序超过六个周期。在至少有一个完整周期的账户中,CCL学生在每日记录方面最勤奋(记录观察的周期天数占95%),其次是CCL会员(88%)和非会员(76%)。CCL教师记录观察的周期天数频率最低(73%)。在每个队列中,记录周期超过六个的账户中记录观察的周期天数比例较低,这可能反映出他们对个人生育模式的了解增加。没有已知NFP正式培训的长期用户记录生育观察的周期天数比例仍然最低。我们得出结论,正式的NFP指导增加了长期使用该应用程序的可能性,并且无论是否接受培训,长期用户可能会在大约70%的周期天数记录观察结果。

总结

“接受NFP培训的CyclePro™用户在每日数据输入方面比未接受培训的用户更持久、更勤奋。”

相似文献

2
Natural family planning: a review.自然计划生育:综述
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1982 Feb;37(2):128-50. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198202000-00026.
8
Natural family planning.自然计划生育
NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs. 1992;3(2):280-90.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验