Wang Xiaohua, Kou Hongju, He Huiliao, Lu Mingdong, Zhou Lingling, Wang Liang
Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 May 5;10:532. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00532. eCollection 2020.
To explore the difference of perfusion parameters between gastric cancer (GC) and gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) by using oral contrast plus contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (OC+CEUS). We retrospectively reviewed 149 patients with histologically confirmed gastric lesions (80 patients with GC and 69 patients with GST). OC+CEUS was performed in all patients in the GC group and the GST group before surgery. The cine loops of OC+CEUS of all cases were analyzed. The perfusion parameters including arrival time (AT), time to peak (TTP), basal intensity (BI), and peak intensity (PI) were obtained via a program designed for autotracking contrast quantification (ACQ). The between-group differences in these parameters were compared. According to time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, high-risk GST had higher PI than low-risk GST ( < 0.05). GC had faster AT and higher PI than normal gastric wall ( < 0.05); GST had higher PI than normal gastric wall ( < 0.05). Furthermore, the GC group had faster AT and higher PI than the GST group ( < 0.05). In contrast, the difference in BI and peak time (TTP) between the groups was not significant ( > 0.05). AT and PI differ significantly between the GC group and the GST group. As a new method, OC+CEUS has value for the differential diagnosis of GC and GST.
通过口服对比剂联合超声造影(OC+CEUS)探讨胃癌(GC)与胃间质瘤(GSTs)灌注参数的差异。我们回顾性分析了149例经组织学证实的胃部病变患者(80例GC患者和69例GST患者)。GC组和GST组所有患者在手术前均接受了OC+CEUS检查。分析了所有病例的OC+CEUS动态图像。通过一个专为自动追踪对比剂定量(ACQ)设计的程序获得灌注参数,包括达峰时间(AT)、峰值时间(TTP)、基础强度(BI)和峰值强度(PI)。比较了这些参数在组间的差异。根据时间-强度曲线(TIC)分析,高危GST的PI高于低危GST(<0.05)。GC的AT比正常胃壁更快,PI更高(<0.05);GST的PI比正常胃壁更高(<0.05)。此外,GC组的AT比GST组更快,PI更高(<0.05)。相比之下,两组之间的BI和峰值时间(TTP)差异不显著(>0.05)。GC组和GST组之间的AT和PI差异显著。作为一种新方法,OC+CEUS对GC和GST的鉴别诊断具有价值。