• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解你的受众:一种烟雾感知参与者的分类法,用于为野火烟雾健康风险沟通提供信息。

Knowing Your Audience: A Typology of Smoke Sense Participants to Inform Wildfire Smoke Health Risk Communication.

机构信息

Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 May 5;8:143. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00143. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00143
PMID:32432070
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7214918/
Abstract

Central to public health risk communication is understanding the perspectives and shared values among individuals who need the information. Using the responses from a Smoke Sense citizen science project, we examined perspectives on the issue of wildfire smoke as a health risk in relation to an individual's preparedness to adopt recommended health behaviors. The Smoke Sense smartphone application provides wildfire-related health risk resources and invites participants to record their perspectives on the issue of wildfire smoke. Within the app, participants can explore current and forecasted daily air quality, maps of fire locations, satellite images of smoke plumes, and learn about health consequences of wildfire smoke. We used cluster analysis to identify perspective trait-clusters based on health status, experience with fire smoke, risk perception, self-efficacy, access to exposure-reducing resources, health information needs, and openness to health risk messaging. Differences between traits were examined based on demographics, health status, activity level and engagement with the app. We mapped these traits to the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM) to indicate where each trait lies in adopting recommended health behaviors. Finally, we suggest messaging strategies that may be suitable for each trait. We determined five distinct perspective traits which included individuals who were and have decided to engage on the issue by adopting new behaviors to protect their health; individuals who were at a stage but differed based on risk perceptions and information needs; and the who did not perceive smoke as a health issue and were unlikely to change behavior in response to messaging. Across all five traits, the level of engagement and information needs differed substantially, but were not defined by demographics. Individuals in the trait had the highest level of engagement and the highest information needs. Messaging that emphasizes self-efficacy and benefits of reducing exposure may be effective in motivating individuals from the deciding stage to taking health protective action. Shared perspectives define an individual's propensity for acting on recommended health behaviors, therefore, health risk message content should be tailored based on these perspectives.

摘要

公共卫生风险沟通的核心是理解需要信息的个人的观点和共同价值观。本研究使用“感知烟雾”公民科学项目的回应,考察了个体对野火烟雾作为健康风险的看法与个体准备采取建议健康行为之间的关系。“感知烟雾”智能手机应用程序提供了与野火相关的健康风险资源,并邀请参与者记录他们对野火烟雾问题的看法。在应用程序中,参与者可以探索当前和预测的每日空气质量、火灾位置图、烟雾羽流的卫星图像,并了解野火烟雾对健康的影响。我们使用聚类分析基于健康状况、火灾烟雾体验、风险感知、自我效能、接触减少暴露资源、健康信息需求和对健康风险信息的开放性,识别基于健康状况、体验火灾烟雾、风险感知、自我效能、接触减少暴露资源、健康信息需求和对健康风险信息的开放性的观点特征群。根据人口统计学特征、健康状况、活动水平和对应用程序的参与度,研究了特征之间的差异。我们将这些特征映射到预防采用过程模型(PAPM)中,以表明每个特征在采取推荐的健康行为中的位置。最后,我们提出了适合每个特征的信息传递策略。我们确定了五个不同的观点特征,包括已经决定通过采取新的行为来保护自己健康来参与该问题的 个体;处于 阶段但基于风险感知和信息需求而有所不同的 个体;以及不认为烟雾是健康问题且不太可能对信息传递做出反应而改变行为的 个体。在所有五个特征中,参与度和信息需求水平差异很大,但不受人口统计学特征的定义。处于 特征的个体具有最高的参与度和最高的信息需求。强调自我效能和减少暴露的好处的信息传递可能有效地激励处于决策阶段的个体采取健康保护行动。共享的观点定义了个人采取建议健康行为的倾向,因此,健康风险信息内容应根据这些观点进行定制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a124/7214918/b06f9a66306f/fpubh-08-00143-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a124/7214918/b06f9a66306f/fpubh-08-00143-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a124/7214918/b06f9a66306f/fpubh-08-00143-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowing Your Audience: A Typology of Smoke Sense Participants to Inform Wildfire Smoke Health Risk Communication.了解你的受众:一种烟雾感知参与者的分类法,用于为野火烟雾健康风险沟通提供信息。
Front Public Health. 2020 May 5;8:143. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00143. eCollection 2020.
2
A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke.对非职业性接触野火烟雾对身体健康影响的系统评价。
Environ Res. 2015 Jan;136:120-32. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
3
Smoke Sense Initiative Leverages Citizen Science to Address the Growing Wildfire-Related Public Health Problem.烟雾感知倡议利用公民科学来解决日益严重的与野火相关的公共卫生问题。
Geohealth. 2019 Dec 10;3(12):443-457. doi: 10.1029/2019GH000199. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Clearing the air: evaluating institutions' social media health messaging on wildfire and smoke risks in the US Pacific Northwest.净化空气:评估美国太平洋西北地区各机构在社交媒体上发布的有关野火和烟雾风险的健康信息
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17907-1.
5
A scoping review of wildfire smoke risk communications: issues, gaps, and recommendations.野火烟雾风险沟通的范围审查:问题、差距与建议
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 27;24(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17681-0.
6
Building a Practice-Based Research Agenda for Wildfire Smoke and Health: A Report of the 2018 Washington Wildfire Smoke Risk Communication Stakeholder Synthesis Symposium.制定基于实践的野火烟雾与健康研究议程:2018 年华盛顿野火烟雾风险沟通利益相关者综合研讨会报告。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 6;16(13):2398. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132398.
7
Wildland fire smoke and human health.野火烟雾与人类健康。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 15;624:586-595. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
8
Responses to Wildfire and Prescribed Fire Smoke: A Survey of a Medically Vulnerable Adult Population in the Wildland-Urban Interface, Mariposa County, California.对野火和计划火烧烟的反应:加利福尼亚马里波萨县城乡交错带医学脆弱成年人群的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1210. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021210.
9
A dataset on human perception of and response to wildfire smoke.一个关于人类对野火烟雾的感知和反应的数据集。
Sci Data. 2019 Oct 24;6(1):229. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0251-y.
10
The impact of wildfires on air pollution and health across land use categories in Brazil over a 16-year period.16年间巴西野火对不同土地利用类型地区空气污染和健康的影响。
Environ Res. 2023 May 1;224:115522. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115522. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding rural adaptation to smoke from wildfires and forest management: insights for aligning approaches with community contexts.了解农村地区对野火烟雾和森林管理的适应情况:使方法与社区背景相契合的见解。
Int J Wildland Fire. 2025 Jan;34(1). doi: 10.1071/wf24016. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
2
What drives parents' use of air quality indexes during wildfire smoke events: predictors of index knowledge, frequent checking, and following health guidance.野火烟雾事件期间促使家长使用空气质量指数的因素:指数知识、频繁查看及遵循健康指南的预测因素
Popul Environ. 2025;47(2):20. doi: 10.1007/s11111-025-00491-w. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
3
Wildfire and Smoke Risk Communication: A Systematic Literature Review from a Health Equity Focus.

本文引用的文献

1
Scaling Up: Citizen Science Engagement and Impacts Beyond the Individual.扩大规模:公民科学参与及个体之外的影响
Citiz Sci. 2020 Jan 7;5(1):1-13. doi: 10.5334/cstp.244.
2
Smoke Sense Initiative Leverages Citizen Science to Address the Growing Wildfire-Related Public Health Problem.烟雾感知倡议利用公民科学来解决日益严重的与野火相关的公共卫生问题。
Geohealth. 2019 Dec 10;3(12):443-457. doi: 10.1029/2019GH000199. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
The SMART Study, a Mobile Health and Citizen Science Methodological Platform for Active Living Surveillance, Integrated Knowledge Translation, and Policy Interventions: Longitudinal Study.
野火与烟雾风险沟通:以健康公平为重点的系统文献综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 3;22(3):368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030368.
4
Smoke on the horizon: leveling up citizen and social science to motivate health protective responses during wildfires.地平线上的烟雾:提升公民和社会科学水平以激发野火期间的健康保护反应。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024 Feb 12;11:253. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-02641-1.
5
Enhancing risk and crisis communication with computational methods: A systematic literature review.利用计算方法加强风险与危机沟通:一项系统文献综述
Risk Anal. 2025 Jul;45(7):1683-1697. doi: 10.1111/risa.17690. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
6
Symptoms Reported by Young Adults With Asthma During Wildfire Smoke Season.年轻人在野火烟雾季节报告的哮喘症状。
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Dec;75(6):974-977. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.07.026. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
7
Behavioral Responses to Wildfire Smoke: A Case Study in Western Montana.对野火烟雾的行为反应:蒙大拿州西部的一个案例研究。
J Community Health. 2025 Feb;50(1):31-44. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01390-1. Epub 2024 Aug 25.
8
Motivating parents to protect their children from wildfire smoke: the impact of air quality index infographics.激励父母保护孩子免受野火烟雾危害:空气质量指数信息图表的影响
Environ Res Commun. 2024 Jul 1;6(7):075001. doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/ad5931.
9
Knowledge, attitudes and practices about air pollution and its health effects in 6th to 11th-grade students in Colombia: a cross-sectional study.哥伦比亚 6 至 11 年级学生对空气污染及其健康影响的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 19;12:1390780. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1390780. eCollection 2024.
10
A scoping review of wildfire smoke risk communications: issues, gaps, and recommendations.野火烟雾风险沟通的范围审查:问题、差距与建议
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 27;24(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17681-0.
SMART研究,一个用于积极生活监测、综合知识转化和政策干预的移动健康与公民科学方法平台:纵向研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 Mar 27;4(1):e31. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.8953.
4
The Asthma Mobile Health Study, a large-scale clinical observational study using ResearchKit.哮喘移动健康研究,一项使用ResearchKit的大规模临床观察性研究。
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Apr;35(4):354-362. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3826. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
5
Crisis and emergency risk communication lessons from the Elk River spill.从埃尔克河泄漏事件中汲取的危机与应急风险沟通教训。
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Aug;122(8):A214-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.122-A214.
6
Cardio-respiratory outcomes associated with exposure to wildfire smoke are modified by measures of community health.暴露于野火烟雾与心肺相关的健康结果受社区健康措施的影响。
Environ Health. 2012 Sep 24;11:71. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-71.
7
Risk communication for public health emergencies.突发公共卫生事件的风险沟通
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:33-54. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123.
8
A test of major assumptions about behavior change: a comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic.对行为改变主要假设的一项检验:全面审视自艾滋病流行开始以来被动和主动预防艾滋病干预措施的效果。
Psychol Bull. 2005 Nov;131(6):856-97. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.856.