• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大规模:公民科学参与及个体之外的影响

Scaling Up: Citizen Science Engagement and Impacts Beyond the Individual.

作者信息

Hano Mary Clare, Wei Linda, Hubbell Bryan, Rappold Ana G

机构信息

Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, US.

出版信息

Citiz Sci. 2020 Jan 7;5(1):1-13. doi: 10.5334/cstp.244.

DOI:10.5334/cstp.244
PMID:33014428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7529103/
Abstract

As the application of citizen science expands to address increasingly complex social problems (e.g., community health), there is opportunity to consider higher-order engagement beyond that of individual members of a community. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is working to foster public engagement in science through Smoke Sense, which is a citizen science research project that aims to reduce the public health burden of wildland fire smoke. Smoke Sense is facilitated by a mobile app that shares information on air quality, smoke, and health, and collects individual reports of smoke exposure and concurrent health symptoms. However, Smoke Sense is also generating interest among organizations that are working in this problem domain at the local, state, national, and tribal levels. The interest in the citizen science project at the organizational level led us to ask: What would motivate members of organizations to engage in a citizen science project like Smoke Sense, and how do they envision that engagement could improve public health? To explore these questions, we collected data through interviews with individuals who were engaged in Smoke Sense through their work at local, state, and tribal environmental and health agencies in the western US. An inductive, thematic analysis suggests that individuals' motivations stem from their experiences and challenges with smoke in their different roles (e.g., personal, professional, and community member). Respondents envisioned leveraging both the app itself and the data generated by individuals in their region to enhance and support their existing outreach and communication efforts related to smoke. Citizen science projects that aim to address issues in complex problem domains should be designed to complement the work of partner organizations.

摘要

随着公民科学的应用不断扩展,以解决日益复杂的社会问题(如社区健康),有机会考虑超越社区个体成员的更高层次的参与。美国环境保护局(EPA)正通过“烟雾感知”项目努力促进公众对科学的参与,该项目是一个公民科学研究项目,旨在减轻野火烟雾对公众健康造成的负担。“烟雾感知”项目由一款移动应用程序推动,该应用程序分享空气质量、烟雾和健康方面的信息,并收集烟雾暴露及同时出现的健康症状的个人报告。然而,“烟雾感知”项目也引起了在地方、州、国家和部落层面从事该问题领域工作的组织的兴趣。组织层面对该公民科学项目的兴趣促使我们提出以下问题:什么会促使组织成员参与像“烟雾感知”这样的公民科学项目,以及他们设想这种参与如何能够改善公众健康?为了探讨这些问题,我们通过采访在美国西部地方、州和部落环境与健康机构工作并参与“烟雾感知”项目的个人来收集数据。一项归纳式主题分析表明,个人的动机源于他们在不同角色(如个人、专业人员和社区成员)中与烟雾相关的经历和挑战。受访者设想利用该应用程序本身以及所在地区个人生成的数据,来加强和支持他们现有的与烟雾相关的推广和宣传工作。旨在解决复杂问题领域问题的公民科学项目应设计为补充合作伙伴组织的工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/158d/7529103/b987736a87b6/nihms-1602239-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/158d/7529103/e96c6aac8dad/nihms-1602239-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/158d/7529103/ee3fe801aa92/nihms-1602239-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/158d/7529103/5f07b7767868/nihms-1602239-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/158d/7529103/b987736a87b6/nihms-1602239-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/158d/7529103/e96c6aac8dad/nihms-1602239-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/158d/7529103/ee3fe801aa92/nihms-1602239-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/158d/7529103/5f07b7767868/nihms-1602239-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/158d/7529103/b987736a87b6/nihms-1602239-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Scaling Up: Citizen Science Engagement and Impacts Beyond the Individual.扩大规模:公民科学参与及个体之外的影响
Citiz Sci. 2020 Jan 7;5(1):1-13. doi: 10.5334/cstp.244.
2
Smoke on the horizon: leveling up citizen and social science to motivate health protective responses during wildfires.地平线上的烟雾:提升公民和社会科学水平以激发野火期间的健康保护反应。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024 Feb 12;11:253. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-02641-1.
3
Smoke Sense Initiative Leverages Citizen Science to Address the Growing Wildfire-Related Public Health Problem.烟雾感知倡议利用公民科学来解决日益严重的与野火相关的公共卫生问题。
Geohealth. 2019 Dec 10;3(12):443-457. doi: 10.1029/2019GH000199. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Knowing Your Audience: A Typology of Smoke Sense Participants to Inform Wildfire Smoke Health Risk Communication.了解你的受众:一种烟雾感知参与者的分类法,用于为野火烟雾健康风险沟通提供信息。
Front Public Health. 2020 May 5;8:143. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00143. eCollection 2020.
5
Evolving partnerships: engagement methods in an established health services research team.不断发展的伙伴关系:一个成熟的卫生服务研究团队中的参与方法
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 9;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00314-w.
6
Citizen science to improve patient and public involvement in GUideline Implementation in oral health and DEntistry (the GUIDE platform).促进患者和公众参与口腔健康和牙科指南实施的公民科学(GUIDE 平台)。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13921. doi: 10.1111/hex.13921. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
7
Qualitative Study定性研究
8
Establishing a Community Air Monitoring Network in a Wildfire Smoke-Prone Rural Community: The Motivations, Experiences, Challenges, and Ideas of Clean Air Methow's Clean Air Ambassadors.在野火烟雾多发的农村社区建立社区空气监测网络:清洁空气梅托的清洁空气大使的动机、经验、挑战和想法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 13;17(22):8393. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228393.
9
A Citizen Science and Government Collaboration: Developing Tools to Facilitate Community Air Monitoring.公民科学与政府合作:开发促进社区空气监测的工具。
Environ Justice. 2017;10(2). doi: 10.1089/env.2016.0044.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Smoke on the horizon: leveling up citizen and social science to motivate health protective responses during wildfires.地平线上的烟雾:提升公民和社会科学水平以激发野火期间的健康保护反应。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024 Feb 12;11:253. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-02641-1.
2
What's in it for citizen scientists? An Analysis of Participant Inclusivity in Citizen Science Projects in Advanced Physics Research.公民科学家能从中获得什么?对高等物理研究中公民科学项目的参与者包容性分析。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Jan 14;4:124. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.17436.2. eCollection 2024.
3
Knowledge, attitudes and practices about air pollution and its health effects in 6th to 11th-grade students in Colombia: a cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
No PhDs needed: how citizen science is transforming research.无需博士学位:公民科学如何改变研究。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):480-482. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07106-5.
2
Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Emergency Department Visits Associated With Wildfire Smoke Exposure in California in 2015.2015 年加利福尼亚州因野火烟雾暴露导致的心血管和脑血管急诊就诊情况。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 11;7(8):e007492. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007492.
3
Wildland fire smoke and human health.野火烟雾与人类健康。
哥伦比亚 6 至 11 年级学生对空气污染及其健康影响的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 19;12:1390780. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1390780. eCollection 2024.
4
Citizen Science Studies in Nursing: A Systematic Review.护理领域的公民科学研究:一项系统综述
Nurs Rep. 2024 Apr 16;14(2):946-960. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14020072.
5
A scoping review of wildfire smoke risk communications: issues, gaps, and recommendations.野火烟雾风险沟通的范围审查:问题、差距与建议
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 27;24(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17681-0.
6
The case for citizen science in public health policy and practice: a mixed methods study of policymaker and practitioner perspectives and experiences.公民科学在公共卫生政策和实践中的应用:决策者和实践者观点与经验的混合方法研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 May 1;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00978-8.
7
Citizen science: How to extend reciprocal benefits from the project community to the broader socio-ecological system.公民科学:如何将项目社区的互惠利益扩展到更广泛的社会生态系统。
Quant Plant Biol. 2022 Oct 3;3:e20. doi: 10.1017/qpb.2022.16. eCollection 2022.
8
Knowing Your Audience: A Typology of Smoke Sense Participants to Inform Wildfire Smoke Health Risk Communication.了解你的受众:一种烟雾感知参与者的分类法,用于为野火烟雾健康风险沟通提供信息。
Front Public Health. 2020 May 5;8:143. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00143. eCollection 2020.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 15;624:586-595. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
4
Community Vulnerability to Health Impacts of Wildland Fire Smoke Exposure.社区对野火烟雾暴露所致健康影响的脆弱性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Jun 20;51(12):6674-6682. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06200. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
5
Differential respiratory health effects from the 2008 northern California wildfires: A spatiotemporal approach.2008年北加利福尼亚野火对呼吸系统健康的差异影响:一种时空分析方法。
Environ Res. 2016 Oct;150:227-235. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
6
Critical Review of Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke Exposure.野火烟雾暴露对健康影响的批判性综述
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Sep;124(9):1334-43. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409277. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry.定性研究中确定严谨性策略的批判性分析
Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1212-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315588501. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
8
The promise of community-based participatory research for health equity: a conceptual model for bridging evidence with policy.基于社区的参与式研究对健康公平的承诺:将证据与政策联系起来的概念模型。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):1615-23. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301961. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
9
Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.混合方法实施研究中定性数据收集与分析的目的抽样法
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
10
Operationalization of community-based participatory research principles: assessment of the national cancer institute's community network programs.基于社区的参与式研究原则的实施:国家癌症研究所社区网络项目的评估。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jun;102(6):1195-203. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300304. Epub 2011 Nov 28.