Suppr超能文献

全手运动学的线性和非线性降维技术

Linear and Non-linear Dimensionality-Reduction Techniques on Full Hand Kinematics.

作者信息

Portnova-Fahreeva Alexandra A, Rizzoglio Fabio, Nisky Ilana, Casadio Maura, Mussa-Ivaldi Ferdinando A, Rombokas Eric

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.

Shirley Ryan Ability Lab, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 May 5;8:429. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00429. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find a parsimonious representation of hand kinematics data that could facilitate prosthetic hand control. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and a non-linear Autoencoder Network (nAEN) were compared in their effectiveness at capturing the essential characteristics of a wide spectrum of hand gestures and actions. Performance of the two methods was compared on (a) the ability to accurately reconstruct hand kinematic data from a latent manifold of reduced dimension, (b) variance distribution across latent dimensions, and (c) the separability of hand movements in compressed and reconstructed representations derived using a linear classifier. The nAEN exhibited higher performance than PCA in its ability to more accurately reconstruct hand kinematic data from a latent manifold of reduced dimension. Whereas, for two dimensions in the latent manifold, PCA was able to account for 78% of input data variance, nAEN accounted for 94%. In addition, the nAEN latent manifold was spanned by coordinates with more uniform share of signal variance compared to PCA. Lastly, the nAEN was able to produce a manifold of more separable movements than PCA, as different tasks, when reconstructed, were more distinguishable by a linear classifier, SoftMax regression. It is concluded that non-linear dimensionality reduction may offer a more effective platform than linear methods to control prosthetic hands.

摘要

本研究的目的是找到一种简洁的手部运动学数据表示方法,以促进假肢手的控制。对主成分分析(PCA)和非线性自动编码器网络(nAEN)在捕捉广泛手势和动作的基本特征方面的有效性进行了比较。在以下方面比较了这两种方法的性能:(a)从降维后的潜在流形准确重建手部运动学数据的能力;(b)潜在维度上的方差分布;(c)使用线性分类器得出的压缩和重建表示中手部运动的可分离性。nAEN在从降维后的潜在流形更准确地重建手部运动学数据的能力方面表现优于PCA。在潜在流形的两个维度上,PCA能够解释78%的输入数据方差,而nAEN能够解释94%。此外,与PCA相比,nAEN潜在流形由信号方差份额更均匀的坐标所跨越。最后,nAEN能够产生比PCA更具可分离性的运动流形,因为在重建时,不同任务通过线性分类器SoftMax回归更易于区分。得出的结论是,与线性方法相比,非线性降维可能为控制假肢手提供一个更有效的平台。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1821/7214755/c9cd82514cf6/fbioe-08-00429-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验