Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jun 16;54(12):7037-7049. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b06672. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
This critical review analyzes methodologies used to collect, quantify, and characterize microplastics in both wastewater and drinking water. Researchers used different techniques at all stages, from collection to characterization, for quantifying microplastics in urban water systems. This represents a barrier to comprehensively assess the current loads of microplastic and to compare the results obtained by such assessments. The compiled studies address microplastic contamination using four types of sample collection techniques, four methods for processing samples, and four techniques for characterizing microplastics. This results in significant discrepancies in each of the following: (1) reported concentrations in both wastewater effluents and drinking water, (2) microplastic characteristics (i.e., size, color, shape, and composition), and (3) quality control and assurance procedures. Finally, this review qualitatively evaluated the reports by the completeness of their data based on a ranking system using five criteria: sample collection, sample processing, quality control, identification technique, and results. The results of this ranking system clarify disparities between the studies.
这篇评论分析了在废水和饮用水中收集、量化和表征微塑料的方法。研究人员在从收集到表征的各个阶段都使用了不同的技术,以量化城市水系统中的微塑料。这是全面评估当前微塑料负荷并比较此类评估结果的障碍。所汇编的研究使用四种类型的样本采集技术、四种处理样本的方法和四种表征微塑料的技术来解决微塑料污染问题。这导致以下四个方面存在显著差异:(1)废水中微塑料的报告浓度和饮用水,(2)微塑料的特征(即大小、颜色、形状和组成),以及(3)质量控制和保证程序。最后,本综述根据使用五个标准(样本采集、样本处理、质量控制、识别技术和结果)的评分系统,对报告的完整性进行了定性评估。该评分系统的结果阐明了研究之间的差异。