Temple University.
Independent.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 Sep 10;25(4):383-397. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enaa009.
Questions about communication mode (a.k.a. "communication options" or "communication opportunities") remain among the most controversial issues in the many fields that are concerned with the development and well-being of children (and adults) who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing. In this manuscript, we argue that a large part of the reason that this debate persists is due to limitations of the construct itself. We focus on what we term "the crucial question": namely, what kind of experience with linguistic input during infancy and toddlerhood is most likely to result in mastery of at least one language (spoken or signed) by school entry. We argue that the construct of communication mode-as currently construed-actively prevents the discovery of compelling answers to that question. To substantiate our argument, we present a review of a relevant subset of the recent empirical literature and document the prevalence of our concerns. We conclude by articulating the desiderata of an alternative construct that, if appropriately measured, would have the potential to yield answers to what we identify as "the crucial question."
关于沟通模式(又称“沟通选项”或“沟通机会”)的问题仍然是涉及聋人或重听儿童(和成人)发展和福祉的众多领域中最具争议的问题之一。在本文中,我们认为,这场辩论之所以持续存在,很大程度上是由于该结构本身的局限性。我们专注于我们所谓的“关键问题”:即在婴儿期和幼儿期,哪种语言输入经验最有可能导致在入学前掌握至少一种语言(口语或手语)。我们认为,目前所构建的沟通模式结构实际上阻止了对这个问题的引人注目的答案的发现。为了证实我们的论点,我们对最近的实证文献的一个相关子集进行了综述,并记录了我们所关注问题的普遍性。最后,我们阐明了替代结构的必要条件,如果得到适当的衡量,有可能对我们所确定的“关键问题”给出答案。