Division of Biokinesology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Division of Biokinesology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Nov;101(11):2015-2026. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 17.
To adapt the Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke (RPSS) for the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) "Lift Can" (Can) and "Hand to Box" (Box) items.
Retrospective analysis of video-recorded WMFT assessment performed by 3 raters on 2 occasions.
Not applicable.
Participants (N=29) with mild to moderate upper extremity impairment less than 3 months after stroke.
Not applicable.
Inter- and intra-rater agreement, concurrent validity of WMFT-RPSS.
Mean ± SD inter-rater Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC) was 0.61±0.05 for Can WMFT-RPSS and 0.56 (0.03) for Box. Mean ± SD intra-rater AC for Can was 0.63±0.05 and 0.70±0.04 for Box. WMFT-RPSS Can and Box scores correlated with log mean WMFT time (C, -0.73; B, -0.48), Functional Ability Scale (C, 0.87; B, 0.62), Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Score (C, 0.69; B, 0.51), and item movement rate (C, 0.74; B, 0.71) (P<.05 for all). Mean ± SD WMFT-RPSS score across the 29 participants was 12.7±3.5 for Can (max score, 19) and 11.4±3.0 for Box (max score, 16).
WMFT-RPSS demonstrated moderate intra-rater and weak-to-moderate inter-rater agreement for individuals with mild-moderate impairment. For construct validity, Can and Box WMFT-RPSS were significantly correlated with 4 standardized measures. Average WMFT-RPSS scores revealed that some participants may have relied on compensatory movements to complete the task, a revelation not discernable from movement rate alone. The WMFT-RPSS is potentially useful as a valid and reliable tool to examine longitudinal changes in movement quality after stroke.
改编用于 Wolf 运动功能测试(WMFT)“提罐”(Can)和“手到盒”(Box)项目的中风伸手表现量表(RPSS)。
对 3 名评估者在 2 次评估中进行的 WMFT 评估的视频记录进行回顾性分析。
不适用。
中风后 3 个月内上肢轻至中度损伤的参与者(N=29)。
不适用。
组内和组间评分者间的一致性、WMFT-RPSS 的同时效度。
Can WMFT-RPSS 的组间评分者间 Gwet 一致性系数(AC)的平均值±标准差为 0.61±0.05,Box 的 AC 为 0.56(0.03)。Can 的组内评分者间 AC 的平均值±标准差为 0.63±0.05 和 0.70±0.04。WMFT-RPSS Can 和 Box 评分与 log 平均 WMFT 时间(C,-0.73;B,-0.48)、功能能力量表(C,0.87;B,0.62)、上肢 Fugl-Meyer 运动评分(C,0.69;B,0.51)和项目运动速度(C,0.74;B,0.71)呈正相关(所有 P<.05)。29 名参与者的 WMFT-RPSS 平均值±标准差为 Can 12.7±3.5(最高分 19)和 Box 11.4±3.0(最高分 16)。
对于轻度至中度损伤的个体,WMFT-RPSS 显示出中等程度的组内评分者间一致性和弱至中度的组间评分者间一致性。对于结构效度,Can 和 Box WMFT-RPSS 与 4 项标准化测量指标显著相关。平均 WMFT-RPSS 评分显示,一些参与者可能依赖代偿运动来完成任务,而仅从运动速度无法发现这一点。WMFT-RPSS 可能是一种有用的有效且可靠的工具,可用于检查中风后运动质量的纵向变化。