Suppr超能文献

深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症合并不孕伴卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的病灶分布特征:一项观察性临床研究

Lesion distribution characteristics of deep infiltrating endometriosis with ovarian endometrioma: an observational clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, China.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2020 May 20;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00974-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the characteristics of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) lesion distribution when associated with ovarian endometrioma (OEM).

METHODS

The present study analyzed retrospective data obtained by the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, between June 2008 to June 2016. A total of 304 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for complete removal of endometriosis by one experienced surgeon, and histological confirmation of OEM associated with DIE was conducted for each patient. Clinical data were recorded for each patient from medical, operative and pathological reports. Patients were then divided into two groups according to unilateral or bilateral OEM. Patients with unilateral OEM were subsequently divided into two subgroups according to OEM location (left- or right-hand side) and the diameter of the OEM (≤50 and > 50 mm). The distribution characteristics of DIE lesions were then compared between the groups.

RESULTS

DIE lesions were widely distributed, 30 anatomical sites were involved. Patients with associated unilateral OEM (n = 184 patients) had a significantly increased number of DIE lesions when compared with patients with bilateral OEM (n = 120 patients; 2.76 ± 1.52 vs. 2.33 ± 1.34; P = 0.006). Compared with bilateral OEM with DIE, there was a higher rate of intestinal (39.1% vs. 18.3%; P < 0.01) and vaginal (17.4% vs. 6.7%; P < 0.01) infiltration by DIE lesions in unilateral OEM with DIE. The mean number of DIE lesions was not significantly correlated with the location or size of the OEM (2.83 ± 1.56 vs. 2.74 ± 1.53; P = 0.678; and 2.65 ± 1.42 vs. 2.80 ± 1.43; P = 0.518, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups with OEM ≤50 mm and > 50 mm.

CONCLUSION

Lesion distribution characteristics in women diagnosed with histologically proven OEM associated with DIE were frequently multifocal and severe.

摘要

背景

研究卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿(OEM)相关深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症(DIE)病灶分布的特征。

方法

本研究分析了中山大学附属第一医院 2008 年 6 月至 2016 年 6 月间的回顾性资料。由一位经验丰富的外科医生对 304 例患者进行了腹腔镜下完全切除子宫内膜异位症的手术,对每位患者均进行组织学证实 OEM 伴 DIE。从医疗、手术和病理报告中记录每位患者的临床资料。根据单侧或双侧 OEM 将患者分为两组。单侧 OEM 患者随后根据 OEM 位置(左侧或右侧)和 OEM 直径(≤50 和>50mm)分为两个亚组。然后比较各组之间 DIE 病变的分布特征。

结果

DIE 病变广泛分布,涉及 30 个解剖部位。与双侧 OEM(n=120 例)相比,单侧 OEM(n=184 例)患者的 DIE 病变数量明显增加(2.76±1.52 vs. 2.33±1.34;P=0.006)。与双侧 OEM 伴 DIE 相比,单侧 OEM 伴 DIE 肠(39.1% vs. 18.3%;P<0.01)和阴道(17.4% vs. 6.7%;P<0.01)浸润的 DIE 病变发生率更高。DIE 病变的平均数量与 OEM 的位置或大小无显著相关性(2.83±1.56 vs. 2.74±1.53;P=0.678;2.65±1.42 vs. 2.80±1.43;P=0.518)。OEM≤50mm 和>50mm 两组之间无显著差异。

结论

组织学证实 OEM 相关 DIE 患者的病变分布特征常为多灶性和严重性。

相似文献

4
Isolated Ovarian Endometrioma: A History Between Myth and Reality.孤立性卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿:神话与现实之间的历史。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jul-Aug;25(5):884-891. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.026. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

3
Tumor Markers in Differential Diagnosis of Benign Ovarian Masses.肿瘤标志物在卵巢良性肿块鉴别诊断中的应用
Int J Womens Health. 2024 Sep 16;16:1517-1531. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S471058. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

2
Severe ureteral endometriosis: frequency and risk factors.重度输尿管子宫内膜异位症:发病率及危险因素
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Feb;38(2):257-260. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1349083. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
5
Bowel complications in endometriosis surgery.子宫内膜异位症手术中的肠道并发症。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Aug;35:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
9
Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment.子宫内膜异位症:发病机制与治疗。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014 May;10(5):261-75. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.255. Epub 2013 Dec 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验