• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规盆腔超声(US)检查发现的卵巢巧克力囊肿作为深度子宫内膜异位症(DE)磁共振成像(MRI)检查的指征。

Endometriomas on routine pelvic ultrasound (US) as an indication for MRI for deep endometriosis (DE).

作者信息

Jha Priyanka, Huang Colin, Choi Hailey, VanBuren Wendaline, Poder Liina

机构信息

Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05060-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-025-05060-1
PMID:40504389
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether presence of endometriomas on routine pelvic ultrasound (US) can predict presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and correlate endometrioma size with the presence of DE on MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this IRB approved, HIPAA compliant study, radiology data base was queried for MRI exams dedicated for endometriosis evaluation in patients with surgically proven endometriosis over a three-year period (2016-2019). Imaging reports were reviewed for the presence of endometriomas and DE on MRI. For the patients with endometriomas, records were reviewed for concurrent routine pelvic US imaging, which were not tailored to DE protocols. US images were reviewed for the presence of endometriomas, their total number, laterality and largest dimension. Descriptive statistics and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis were performed. Pathology and surgical notes were used as reference standard.

RESULTS

253 patients with surgically confirmed endometriosis underwent MRI for DIE over a 3-year duration. 47 patients had a concurrent US exam. 33/47 patients (70.2%) had endometriomas seen on US (size range 0.9-7.0 cm). 12 had bilateral endometriomas and 13 had multiple (more than 1) endometriomas. 27/33 (82%) of these patients had DE on MRI. 6/33 (18%) patients had additional sites of DE on surgery, which was not reported preoperatively on MRI. When endometriomas more than 3 cm as were evaluated, 19/21 (90%) of patients had DE on MRI. AUC was 0.7106. Using ROC analysis, a threshold of 3.8 cm, provided a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 78% for detection of DE on MRI.

CONCLUSION

Presence of endometriomas on routine pelvic US is associated with a high frequency of DE detected on MRI performed for endometriosis. The frequency of DE on MRI was higher in patients with endometrioma size > 3 cm compared to endometriomas of all size range.

摘要

目的

确定常规盆腔超声(US)检查时子宫内膜瘤的存在是否能预测磁共振成像(MRI)检查时深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症(DE)的存在,并将子宫内膜瘤大小与MRI检查时DE的存在情况进行关联分析。

材料与方法

在这项经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准且符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的研究中,查询了放射学数据库,获取了在三年期间(2016 - 2019年)因手术证实患有子宫内膜异位症的患者专门用于子宫内膜异位症评估的MRI检查数据。对影像报告进行审查,以确定MRI检查时是否存在子宫内膜瘤和DE。对于患有子宫内膜瘤的患者,审查其同时进行的常规盆腔超声成像记录,这些超声成像并非按照DE检查方案进行。对超声图像进行审查,以确定是否存在子宫内膜瘤、其总数、位置及最大尺寸。进行描述性统计和受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析。病理和手术记录用作参考标准。

结果

253例经手术证实患有子宫内膜异位症的患者在3年期间接受了用于评估深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症的MRI检查。47例患者同时进行了超声检查。47例患者中有33例(70.2%)在超声检查中发现有子宫内膜瘤(大小范围为0.9 - 7.0厘米)。12例有双侧子宫内膜瘤,13例有多个(超过1个)子宫内膜瘤。这些患者中有27例(82%)在MRI检查中有DE。6例(18%)患者在手术中发现有额外的DE部位,而MRI术前未报告。当评估大小超过3厘米的子宫内膜瘤时,21例患者中有19例(90%)在MRI检查中有DE。曲线下面积(AUC)为0.7106。使用ROC分析,阈值为3.8厘米时,检测MRI检查中DE的敏感性为71%,特异性为`78%。

结论

常规盆腔超声检查时子宫内膜瘤的存在与为子宫内膜异位症进行的MRI检查中检测到的DE的高频率相关。与所有大小范围的子宫内膜瘤相比,子宫内膜瘤大小>3厘米的患者在MRI检查中DE的频率更高。

相似文献

1
Endometriomas on routine pelvic ultrasound (US) as an indication for MRI for deep endometriosis (DE).常规盆腔超声(US)检查发现的卵巢巧克力囊肿作为深度子宫内膜异位症(DE)磁共振成像(MRI)检查的指征。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05060-1.
2
Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.子宫内膜异位症非侵入性诊断的成像方式
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 26;2(2):CD009591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2.
3
Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.超声和磁共振成像评估深部盆腔子宫内膜异位症的早期学习曲线。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Sep 26;2020:8757281. doi: 10.1155/2020/8757281. eCollection 2020.
4
Isolated Ovarian Endometrioma: A History Between Myth and Reality.孤立性卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿:神话与现实之间的历史。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jul-Aug;25(5):884-891. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.026. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
5
Transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of endometrioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.经阴道超声与磁共振成像诊断卵巢子宫内膜异位症囊肿:诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;44(1):2311664. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2024.2311664. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
6
Comparison of routine pelvic US and MR imaging in patients with pathologically confirmed endometriosis.比较经病理证实的子宫内膜异位症患者的常规盆腔超声和 MRI 成像。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Jun;45(6):1670-1679. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02124-x.
7
Staging of pelvic endometriosis using magnetic resonance imaging compared with the laparoscopic classification of the American Fertility Society: a prospective study.磁共振成像用于盆腔子宫内膜异位症分期与美国生育协会腹腔镜分类的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Radiol Med. 2003 Apr;105(4):326-38.
8
Endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis in adulthood are strongly associated with anogenital distance, a biomarker for prenatal hormonal environment.成年期的子宫内膜异位囊肿和深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症与肛殖距密切相关,肛殖距是一种产前激素环境的生物标志物。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2377-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew163. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Validation of administrative health data for the identification of endometriosis diagnosis.用于识别子宫内膜异位症诊断的行政健康数据验证
Hum Reprod. 2025 Feb 1;40(2):289-295. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae281.
10
Coexistence of endometriomas with extraovarian endometriosis and adhesions.卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿并存卵巢外子宫内膜异位症和粘连。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Aug;263:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.044. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Real world perspectives on endometriosis disease phenotyping through surgery, omics, health data, and artificial intelligence.通过手术、组学、健康数据和人工智能对子宫内膜异位症疾病表型进行的真实世界观察。
NPJ Womens Health. 2025;3(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s44294-024-00052-w. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
2
Radiology State-of-the-art Review: Endometriosis Imaging Interpretation and Reporting.放射学最新综述:子宫内膜异位症的影像学解读和报告。
Radiology. 2024 Sep;312(3):e233482. doi: 10.1148/radiol.233482.
3
Best Practices: Ultrasound Versus MRI in the Assessment of Pelvic Endometriosis.
最佳实践:超声与磁共振成像在盆腔子宫内膜异位症评估中的应用
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Dec;223(6):e2431085. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.31085. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
4
Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: An International Consensus Statement.用于诊断盆腔深部子宫内膜异位症和子宫内膜异位症分类系统的非侵入性成像技术:国际共识声明。
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Jul;176:111450. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111450. Epub 2024 May 29.
5
A decade to wait: Update on the average delay to diagnosis for endometriosis in Aotearoa New Zealand.十年等待:新西兰奥塔哥地区子宫内膜异位症平均诊断延迟情况的最新报告
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Oct;64(5):524-529. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13836. Epub 2024 May 22.
6
Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus on Routine Pelvic US for Endometriosis.超声放射学会关于子宫内膜异位症常规盆腔超声检查的共识。
Radiology. 2024 Apr;311(1):e232191. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232191.
7
Endometriosis MR mimickers: T1-hyperintense lesions.子宫内膜异位症的磁共振成像(MR)模仿者:T1高信号病变。
Insights Imaging. 2024 Jan 24;15(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01587-3.
8
Impact of Uterine Sliding Sign in Routine United States Ultrasound Practice.美国常规超声检查中子宫滑动征的影响。
J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Jun;40(6):1091-1096. doi: 10.1002/jum.15484. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
9
Lesion distribution characteristics of deep infiltrating endometriosis with ovarian endometrioma: an observational clinical study.深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症合并不孕伴卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的病灶分布特征:一项观察性临床研究
BMC Womens Health. 2020 May 20;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00974-y.
10
Recommendations for MRI technique in the evaluation of pelvic endometriosis: consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel.盆腔子宫内膜异位症 MRI 技术评估的推荐意见:来自腹部放射学会子宫内膜异位症疾病重点专家组的共识声明。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Jun;45(6):1569-1586. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02483-w.