Institute of Population Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Sep;74(9):719-725. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213049. Epub 2020 May 20.
Previous studies have suggested that socio-environmental factors interact with genetic risk in the genesis of schizophrenia. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between income, income inequality and schizophrenia and its heterogeneity among different geographic scales and subgroups.
We used data from the Second China National Sample Survey on Disability (2006). The sample consisted of 1 909 205 participants aged 18 years or older. Individuals who were suspected to be psychiatrically disabled were administered the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, Version II and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision Symptom Checklist for Mental Disorders by trained clinical psychiatrists to diagnose schizophrenia. Gross household income per capita was used to calculate the Gini coefficient to measure income inequality. Multilevel logistic regression with cross-level interaction was applied to examine the association of income, income inequality and schizophrenia.
A total of 7 628 persons (0.40%) were identified as having schizophrenia. Income was independently associated with schizophrenia. At the province level, greater income inequality was significantly associated with a higher risk of schizophrenia (OR, 1.03; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.06), and no significant association was observed at the county level. The analysis with cross-level interaction showed that the association at the province level was most pronounced in the highest income quartile (OR, 1.02; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03).
The significant association between income and schizophrenia was consistent with the absolute income hypothesis. The adverse effect of income inequality on the risk of schizophrenia starts to operate at a larger area level, and it is more pronounced for the affluent population in China. This finding further supports the relative income hypothesis and social causation pathway for schizophrenia and calls attention to the vulnerability of high-income groups.
先前的研究表明,社会环境因素与遗传风险共同作用于精神分裂症的发生。本研究旨在探讨收入、收入不平等与精神分裂症之间的关系及其在不同地理尺度和亚组间的异质性。
我们使用了第二次全国残疾人抽样调查(2006 年)的数据。该样本由 1 909 205 名 18 岁及以上的参与者组成。疑似精神残疾的个体由经过培训的临床精神科医生进行世界卫生组织残疾评估表(第二版)和国际疾病分类第十版症状清单(精神障碍)评估,以诊断精神分裂症。人均家庭总收入用于计算基尼系数,以衡量收入不平等。应用跨层次交互的多层次逻辑回归来检验收入、收入不平等与精神分裂症的关联。
共确定了 7 628 人(0.40%)患有精神分裂症。收入与精神分裂症独立相关。在省级层面,更大的收入不平等与更高的精神分裂症风险显著相关(OR,1.03;95%CI 1.00 至 1.06),而在县级层面则无显著关联。跨层次交互分析显示,省级层面的关联在收入最高的四分位数中最为明显(OR,1.02;95%CI 1.00 至 1.03)。
收入与精神分裂症之间的显著关联与绝对收入假说一致。收入不平等对精神分裂症风险的不利影响始于更大的区域层面,对中国富裕人群的影响更为明显。这一发现进一步支持了相对收入假说和精神分裂症的社会因果途径,并提醒人们注意高收入群体的脆弱性。