Suppr超能文献

药物自我管理:一项关于对配药错误、认知及满意度影响的实用随机对照试验

Self-administration of medication: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of the impact on dispensing errors, perceptions, and satisfaction.

作者信息

Sørensen Charlotte Arp, Lisby Marianne, Olesen Charlotte, Enemark Ulrika, Sørensen Signe Bredsgaard, de Thurah Annette

机构信息

Randers Regional Hospital, Dronningborg Boulevard 16D, Randers NØ 8930, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 May 4;11:2042098620904616. doi: 10.1177/2042098620904616. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to investigate whether self-administration of medication (SAM) during hospitalization affects the number of dispensing errors, perceptions regarding medication, and participant satisfaction when compared with nurse-led medication dispensing.

METHODS

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial was performed in a Danish cardiology unit. Patients aged ⩾ 18 years capable of SAM were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they did not self-administer medication at home, were not prescribed medication suitable for self-administration, or did not speak Danish.Intervention group participants self-administered their medication. In the control group, medication was dispensed and administered by nurses.The primary outcome was the proportion of dispensing errors collected through modified disguised observation of participants and nurses. Dispensing errors were divided into clinical and procedural errors.Secondary outcomes were explored through telephone calls to determine participant perceptions regarding medication and satisfaction, and finally, deviations in their medication list two weeks after discharge.

RESULTS

Significantly fewer dispensing errors were observed in the intervention group, with 100 errors/1033 opportunities for error (9.7%), compared with 132 errors/1028 opportunities for error (12.8%) in the control group. The number of clinical errors was significantly reduced, whereas no difference in procedural errors was observed. At follow up, those who were self-administering medication had fewer concerns regarding their medication, found medication to be less harmful, were more satisfied, preferred this opportunity in the future, and had fewer deviations in their medication list after discharge compared with the control group.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the reduced number of dispensing errors in the intervention group, indicate that SAM is safe. In addition, SAM had a positive impact on (a) perceptions regarding medication, thus suggesting increased medication adherence, (b) deviations in medication list after discharge, and (c) participant satisfaction related to medication management at the hospital.

摘要

背景

我们的目的是调查住院期间自我给药(SAM)与护士主导的药物分发相比,是否会影响配药错误的数量、对药物的认知以及参与者的满意度。

方法

在丹麦的一个心脏病科进行了一项实用的随机对照试验。年龄≥18岁且能够进行自我给药的患者符合纳入条件。如果患者在家中不自行给药、未被开具适合自我给药的药物或不会说丹麦语,则被排除在外。干预组参与者自行给药。在对照组中,药物由护士分发和给药。主要结局是通过对参与者和护士进行改良的隐蔽观察收集到的配药错误比例。配药错误分为临床错误和程序错误。通过电话调查来探索次要结局,以确定参与者对药物的认知和满意度,最后,调查出院两周后他们药物清单的偏差情况。

结果

干预组观察到的配药错误明显较少,每1033次出错机会中有100次错误(9.7%),而对照组每1028次出错机会中有132次错误(12.8%)。临床错误的数量显著减少,而程序错误方面未观察到差异。在随访中,与对照组相比,自行给药的患者对药物的担忧更少,认为药物危害更小,更满意,未来更倾向于这种方式,并且出院后药物清单的偏差更少。

结论

总之,干预组配药错误数量的减少表明自我给药是安全的。此外,自我给药对以下方面有积极影响:(a)对药物的认知,从而表明药物依从性提高;(b)出院后药物清单的偏差;以及(c)与医院药物管理相关的参与者满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54d/7225786/c05f8f1de5d5/10.1177_2042098620904616-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验