• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用药错误的经济影响:一项系统综述。

Economic impact of medication error: a systematic review.

作者信息

Walsh Elaine K, Hansen Christina Raae, Sahm Laura J, Kearney Patricia M, Doherty Edel, Bradley Colin P

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 May;26(5):481-497. doi: 10.1002/pds.4188. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1002/pds.4188
PMID:28295821
Abstract

PURPOSE

Medication error is a significant source of morbidity and mortality among patients. Clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence are required for the implementation of quality of care interventions. Reduction of error-related cost is a key potential benefit of interventions addressing medication error. The aim of this review was to describe and quantify the economic burden associated with medication error.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, EconLit, ABI/INFORM, Business Source Complete were searched. Studies published 2004-2016 assessing the economic impact of medication error were included. Cost values were expressed in Euro 2015. A narrative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 4572 articles were identified from database searching, and 16 were included in the review. One study met all applicable quality criteria. Fifteen studies expressed economic impact in monetary terms. Mean cost per error per study ranged from €2.58 to €111 727.08. Healthcare costs were used to measure economic impact in 15 of the included studies with one study measuring litigation costs. Four studies included costs incurred in primary care with the remaining 12 measuring hospital costs. Five studies looked at general medication error in a general population with 11 studies reporting the economic impact of an individual type of medication error or error within a specific patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable variability existed between studies in terms of financial cost, patients, settings and errors included. Many were of poor quality. Assessment of economic impact was conducted predominantly in the hospital setting with little assessment of primary care impact. Limited parameters were used to establish economic impact. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

目的

用药错误是患者发病和死亡的一个重要原因。实施医疗质量干预措施需要临床和成本效益证据。降低与错误相关的成本是解决用药错误干预措施的一个关键潜在益处。本综述的目的是描述和量化与用药错误相关的经济负担。

方法

检索了PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、CINAHL、EconLit、ABI/INFORM、Business Source Complete。纳入了2004年至2016年发表的评估用药错误经济影响的研究。成本值以2015年欧元表示。进行了叙述性综合分析。

结果

通过数据库检索共识别出4572篇文章,其中16篇纳入综述。一项研究符合所有适用的质量标准。15项研究以货币形式表示经济影响。每项研究中每个错误的平均成本从2.58欧元到111727.08欧元不等。在纳入的15项研究中使用医疗保健成本来衡量经济影响,一项研究衡量诉讼成本。4项研究纳入了初级保健中的成本,其余12项衡量医院成本。5项研究着眼于普通人群中的一般用药错误,11项研究报告了个体用药错误类型或特定患者群体中错误的经济影响。

结论

在财务成本、患者、环境和纳入的错误方面,不同研究之间存在很大差异。许多研究质量较差。经济影响评估主要在医院环境中进行,对初级保健影响的评估很少。用于确定经济影响的参数有限。版权所有©2017约翰威立父子有限公司。

相似文献

1
Economic impact of medication error: a systematic review.用药错误的经济影响:一项系统综述。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 May;26(5):481-497. doi: 10.1002/pds.4188. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
3
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.减肥手术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13410.
7
Cost-effectiveness studies of vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review.骨质疏松性椎体骨折椎体增强治疗的成本效益研究:系统评价。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1356-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.02.013. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
9
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the economic impact of clinical pharmacist interventions in the women's health setting in Qatar.评估临床药剂师干预措施对卡塔尔女性健康领域的经济影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01933-z.
2
Medication errors in community pharmacies: a systematic review of the international literature.社区药房的用药差错:国际文献的系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 May 20;20(5):e0322392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322392. eCollection 2025.
3
Machine learning-based risk prediction model for medication administration errors in neonatal intensive care units: A prospective direct observational study.
基于机器学习的新生儿重症监护病房用药错误风险预测模型:一项前瞻性直接观察研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 18;10:20552076241286434. doi: 10.1177/20552076241286434. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Barriers to reporting medical errors from the perspective of obstetric residents: A qualitative study.从产科住院医师角度看医疗差错报告的障碍:一项定性研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Aug 29;13:314. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_767_23. eCollection 2024.
5
A Study on Internet News for Patient Safety Campaigns: Focusing on Text Network Analysis and Topic Modeling.一项关于患者安全宣传活动的网络新闻研究:聚焦于文本网络分析和主题建模
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 24;12(19):1914. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191914.
6
Cost savings from medication reviews in community pharmacies for nursing home residents in Estonia: a case study.社区药房对爱沙尼亚养老院居民进行药物审查的成本节约:案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1119. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11504-z.
7
Disproportionality Analysis and Characterisation of Medication Errors in EudraVigilance: Exploring Findings on Sexes and Age Groups.EudraVigilance中用药错误的不成比例性分析与特征描述:探索性别和年龄组的研究结果
Drug Saf. 2025 Jan;48(1):59-74. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01478-6. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
8
Epidemiological Aspects and Pattern of Intoxication among Elderly in Khorasan-Razavi; Northeast of Iran.伊朗东北部霍拉桑-拉扎维省老年人中毒的流行病学特征与模式
J Prev (2022). 2025 Feb;46(1):103-120. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00804-z. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
9
Characteristics and causes of reported clozapine-related medication errors: analysis of the Ministry of Health database in Saudi Arabia.报告的氯氮平相关用药差错的特征和原因:沙特阿拉伯卫生部数据库分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec;46(6):1410-1418. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01782-2. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
10
Methicillin-resistant -associated empyema necessitans in a child: A case report and a literature review.儿童耐甲氧西林相关的坏死性脓胸:一例病例报告及文献综述
Qatar Med J. 2024 Jul 1;2024(3):27. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2024.27. eCollection 2024.