Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universitat Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2020 Oct;30(10):5684-5689. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06942-2. Epub 2020 May 20.
To evaluate ESR eGUIDE-the European Society of Radiology (ESR) e-Learning tool for appropriate use of diagnostic imaging modalities-for learning purposes in different clinical scenarios.
This anonymized evaluation was performed after approval of ESR Education on Demand leadership. Forty clinical scenarios were developed in which at least one imaging modality was clinically most appropriate, and the scenarios were divided into sets 1 and 2. These sets were provided to medical students randomly assigned to group A or B to select the most appropriate imaging test for each scenario. Statistical comparisons were made within and across groups.
Overall, 40 medical students participated, and 31 medical students (78%) answered both sets. The number of correctly chosen imaging methods per set in these 31 paired samples was significantly higher when answered with versus without use of ESR eGUIDE (13.7 ± 2.6 questions vs. 12.1 ± 3.2, p = 0.012). Among the students in group A, who first answered set 1 without ESR eGUIDE (11.1 ± 3.2), there was significant improvement when set 2 was answered with ESR eGUIDE (14.3 ± 2.5, p = 0.013). The number of correct answers in group B did not drop when set 2 was answered without ESR eGUIDE (12.4 ± 2.6) after having answered set 1 first with ESR eGUIDE (13.0 ± 2.7, p = 0.66).
The clinical decision support tool ESR eGUIDE is suitable for training medical students in choosing the best radiological imaging modality in typical scenarios, and its use in teaching radiology can thus be recommended.
• ESR eGUIDE improved the number of appropriately selected imaging modalities among medical students. • This improvement was also seen in the group of students which first selected imaging tests without ESR eGUIDE. • In the student group which used ESR eGUIDE first, appropriate selection remained stable even without the teaching tool.
评估欧洲放射学会(ESR)的 ESR eGUIDE——一种用于诊断影像学合理应用的电子学习工具——在不同临床场景下的学习效果。
该匿名评估是在 ESR 按需教育领导层批准后进行的。开发了 40 个临床场景,其中至少有一种影像学方式在临床上是最合适的,这些场景被分为 1 组和 2 组。这些组被随机分配给 A 组或 B 组的医学生,要求他们为每个场景选择最合适的影像学检查。在组内和组间进行了统计学比较。
共有 40 名医学生参与,其中 31 名医学生(78%)回答了两组问题。在这 31 对配对样本中,当使用 ESR eGUIDE 回答问题时,正确选择的影像学方法数量明显高于不使用 ESR eGUIDE 回答问题时的数量(13.7±2.6 个问题 vs. 12.1±3.2 个问题,p=0.012)。在首先回答第 1 组问题但不使用 ESR eGUIDE 的 A 组学生中,当使用 ESR eGUIDE 回答第 2 组问题时,其回答质量有明显改善(14.3±2.5 个问题 vs. 11.1±3.2 个问题,p=0.013)。在首先使用 ESR eGUIDE 回答第 1 组问题然后回答第 2 组问题但不使用 ESR eGUIDE 的 B 组学生中,其正确回答的数量并未下降(12.4±2.6 个问题)。
临床决策支持工具 ESR eGUIDE 适用于培训医学生在典型场景中选择最佳影像学方式,因此推荐在放射学教学中使用。
ESR eGUIDE 提高了医学生选择适当影像学方式的数量。
这种改善也出现在首先不使用 ESR eGUIDE 选择影像学检查的学生组中。
在首先使用 ESR eGUIDE 的学生组中,即使没有教学工具,正确选择的稳定性也得以保持。