• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用行为经济学的洞察力来减轻 COVID-19 的传播。

Using Insights from Behavioral Economics to Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19.

机构信息

Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Jun;18(3):345-350. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00595-4.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-020-00595-4
PMID:32435987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7239690/
Abstract

The outbreak of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has become a public health emergency of international concern. The number of COVID-infected individuals and related deaths continues to rise rapidly. Encouraging people to adopt and sustain preventive behaviors is a central focus of public health policies that seek to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Public health policy needs improved methods to encourage people to adhere to COVID-19-preventive behaviors. In this paper, we introduce a number of insights from behavioral economics that help explain why people may behave irrationally during the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, present bias, status quo bias, framing effect, optimism bias, affect heuristic, and herding behavior are discussed. We hope this paper will shed light on how insights from behavioral economics can enrich public health policies and interventions in the fight against COVID-19.

摘要

2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的爆发已成为国际关注的公共卫生紧急事件。COVID-19 感染人数和相关死亡人数继续迅速上升。鼓励人们采取并坚持预防行为是公共卫生政策的核心重点,这些政策旨在减轻 COVID-19 的传播。公共卫生政策需要改进方法来鼓励人们坚持 COVID-19 预防行为。在本文中,我们介绍了一些行为经济学的观点,这些观点有助于解释为什么人们在 COVID-19 大流行期间可能会做出不合理的行为。特别是,讨论了现时偏见、现状偏见、框架效应、乐观偏见、情感启发和羊群行为。我们希望本文将阐明行为经济学的观点如何丰富对抗 COVID-19 的公共卫生政策和干预措施。

相似文献

1
Using Insights from Behavioral Economics to Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19.利用行为经济学的洞察力来减轻 COVID-19 的传播。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Jun;18(3):345-350. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00595-4.
2
Lived Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的生活经历
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Aug;41(8):661. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2020.1773738.
3
Suicide research and prevention during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间及之后的自杀研究与预防
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Nov;142(5):353-354. doi: 10.1111/acps.13248.
4
Challenges and Opportunities Created by the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情带来的挑战与机遇
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Jul;52(7):669-670. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 May 21.
5
Pandemics, panic and prevention: Stages in the life of COVID-19 pandemic.大流行、恐慌与预防:新冠疫情历程中的阶段
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;66(8):733-734. doi: 10.1177/0020764020924449. Epub 2020 May 2.
6
Fear, information and control during a pandemic.大流行期间的恐惧、信息与管控
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2020 Jun 22;140(10). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0346. Print 2020 Jun 30.
7
Elective cardiovascular care in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic: managing tragic choices.2019冠状病毒病大流行时代的择期心血管护理:应对艰难抉择。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Sep;9(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001069.
8
Surviving the trauma of COVID-19.从新冠疫情的创伤中挺过来。
Science. 2020 Jul 3;369(6499):11. doi: 10.1126/science.abd5396.
9
COVID-19 and interconnectedness.新冠病毒肺炎与相互联系
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Jun;47:102164. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102164. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
10
US Public Concerns About the COVID-19 Pandemic From Results of a Survey Given via Social Media.美国公众对社交媒体调查中 COVID-19 大流行的看法。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):1020-1022. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1369.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of behavioral intervention components to increase COVID-19 testing for African American/Black and Latine frontline essential workers not up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccination: Results of an optimization randomized controlled trial.行为干预组件对未接种新冠疫苗的非裔美国/黑人及拉丁裔一线必要工作者增加新冠病毒检测的影响:一项优化随机对照试验的结果
J Behav Med. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00566-x.
2
The Role of Time Preferences in Compliance With COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors in Iran: A Quasi-hyperbolic Discounting Approach.时间偏好对伊朗民众遵守新冠疫情预防行为的影响:基于准双曲线贴现法的研究
J Prev Med Public Health. 2025 May;58(3):326-335. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.453. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
3
How dispositional optimism-pessimism relates to early adolescents' emotional maladjustment during COVID-19? Moderating roles of knowledge about the disease and parent-child conflicts.性格乐观-悲观如何与新冠疫情期间青少年早期的情绪失调相关?疾病认知和亲子冲突的调节作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 20;16:1470733. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1470733. eCollection 2025.
4
Perceived protective behavioral changes in Chinese residents post-dynamic zero-COVID policy lifting: a cross-sectional study.动态清零政策解除后中国居民感知到的保护性行为变化:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 30;12:1439749. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1439749. eCollection 2024.
5
[Evaluation of the Dunning Kruger effect in relation to vaccination: a study of messages on the social network LinkedIn.].[关于疫苗接种的邓宁-克鲁格效应评估:对社交网络领英上信息的研究。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2023 Jun 15;97:e202306051.
6
The impact of threshold decision mechanisms of collective behavior on disease spread.集体行为的阈值决策机制对疾病传播的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 9;120(19):e2221479120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221479120. Epub 2023 May 1.
7
Diminishing returns: Nudging Covid-19 prevention among Colombian young adults.收益递减:推动哥伦比亚青年预防新冠病毒。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 22;17(12):e0279179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279179. eCollection 2022.
8
Psychological precursors of individual differences in COVID-19 lockdown adherence: Moderated-moderation by personality and moral cognition measures.新冠疫情封锁期间个体差异的心理先兆:人格与道德认知测量的调节调节作用
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Nov;182:111090. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111090. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
9
Efficiency and herding analysis in gold-backed cryptocurrencies.黄金支持的加密货币的效率与羊群效应分析。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 1;8(12):e11982. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11982. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Follow or not? Descriptive norms and public health compliance: Mediating role of risk perception and moderating effect of behavioral visibility.是否遵循?描述性规范与公共卫生合规性:风险感知的中介作用和行为可见性的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 18;13:1040218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1040218. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak.隔离、检疫、社交距离和社区管控:旧型公共卫生措施在新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)疫情中的关键作用。
J Travel Med. 2020 Mar 13;27(2). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa020.
2
Emerging coronaviruses: Genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis.新兴冠状病毒:基因组结构、复制和发病机制。
J Med Virol. 2020 Apr;92(4):418-423. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25681. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
3
Does integral affect influence intentions to use artificial intelligence for skin cancer screening? A test of the affect heuristic.整体会影响影响使用人工智能进行皮肤癌筛查的意图吗?情感启发式的检验。
Psychol Health. 2019 Jul;34(7):828-849. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1579330. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Child's play: Harnessing play and curiosity motives to improve child handwashing in a humanitarian setting.寓教于乐:利用游戏和好奇心的动机来改善人道主义环境中的儿童洗手习惯。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 Mar;222(2):177-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
5
The role of the affect heuristic and cancer anxiety in responding to negative information about medical tests.影响启发式和癌症焦虑在应对医疗检测负面信息时的作用。
Psychol Health. 2018 Feb;33(2):292-312. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1316848. Epub 2017 May 23.
6
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Opt-In Versus Opt-Out Enrollment Into a Diabetes Behavioral Intervention.一项关于糖尿病行为干预选择加入与选择退出注册的随机对照试验。
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):745-752. doi: 10.1177/0890117116671673. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
7
Behavioral economic incentives to improve adherence to antiretroviral medication.改善抗逆转录病毒药物依从性的行为经济学激励措施。
AIDS. 2017 Mar 13;31(5):719-726. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001387.
8
Some current dimensions of the behavioral economics of health-related behavior change.健康相关行为改变的行为经济学的一些当前维度。
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
9
Applying Behavioral Economics to Public Health Policy: Illustrative Examples and Promising Directions.将行为经济学应用于公共卫生政策:示例与前景展望
Am J Prev Med. 2016 May;50(5 Suppl 1):S13-S19. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.007.
10
The role of time and risk preferences in adherence to physician advice on health behavior change.时间和风险偏好在遵医嘱改变健康行为方面的作用。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Apr;18(3):373-386. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0800-7. Epub 2016 Apr 16.