Saint-Etienne Jean Monnet University, Roanne Technology University Institute, University of Lyon, LASPI (EA3059), Roanne, F-42334, France.
University of La Réunion, UFRSHE, IRISSE Laboratory (EA4075), Le Tampon, F-97430, France.
Exp Physiol. 2020 Aug;105(8):1216-1222. doi: 10.1113/EP088640. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
What is the central question of this study? Can Granger causality analysis of R-R intervals, systolic blood pressure and respiration provide evidence for the different physiological mechanisms induced during thermoneutral water immersion, 6 deg head-down tilt and supine position tests that are not accessible using traditional heart rate variability and baroreflex methods? What is the main finding and its importance? The Granger analysis demonstrated a significant difference in the causal link from R-R intervals to respiration between water immersion and head-down tilt. The underlying physiological mechanism explaining this difference could be the variation in peripheral resistances.
Thermoneutral head-out water immersion (WI) and 6 deg head-down tilt (HDT) are used to simulate SCUBA diving, swimming and microgravity, because these models induce an increase in central blood volume. Standard methods to analyse autonomic regulation have demonstrated an increase in parasympathetic activity and baroreflex sensitivity during these experimental conditions. However, such methods are not adapted to quantify all closed-loop interactions involved in respiratory and cardiovascular regulation. To overcome this limitation, we used Granger causality analysis between R-R intervals (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and respiration (RE) in eight young, healthy subjects, recorded during 30 min periods in the supine position, WI and HDT. For all experimental conditions, we found a bidirectional causal relationship between RE and RR and between RR and SBP, with a dominant direction from RR to SBP, and a unidirectional causality from RE to SBP. These causal relationships remained unchanged for the three experimental tests. Interestingly, there was a lower causal relationship from RR to RE during WI compared with HDT. This causal link from RR to RE could be modulated by peripheral resistances. These results highlight differences in cardiovascular regulation during WI and HDT and confirm that Granger causality might reveal physiological mechanisms not accessible with standard methods.
本研究的核心问题是什么?通过对 R-R 间期、收缩压和呼吸的格兰杰因果分析,能否为在传统心率变异性和压力反射方法无法获得的热中性水环境、6 度头低位倾斜和仰卧位测试中诱导的不同生理机制提供证据?主要发现及其重要性是什么?格兰杰分析表明,在水浸和头低位倾斜之间,R-R 间期到呼吸的因果关系存在显著差异。解释这种差异的潜在生理机制可能是外周阻力的变化。
热中性头外水浸(WI)和 6 度头低位倾斜(HDT)用于模拟 SCUBA 潜水、游泳和微重力,因为这些模型会增加中心血容量。分析自主调节的标准方法已经证明,在这些实验条件下,副交感神经活动和压力反射敏感性增加。然而,这些方法并不适合量化涉及呼吸和心血管调节的所有闭环相互作用。为了克服这一限制,我们在 8 名年轻健康受试者中使用 R-R 间期(RR)、收缩压(SBP)和呼吸(RE)之间的格兰杰因果分析,在仰卧位、WI 和 HDT 期间记录 30 分钟。对于所有实验条件,我们发现 RE 和 RR 之间以及 RR 和 SBP 之间存在双向因果关系,RR 到 SBP 的主导方向,以及从 RE 到 SBP 的单向因果关系。这三个实验测试中因果关系保持不变。有趣的是,在 WI 期间,RR 到 RE 的因果关系低于 HDT。RR 到 RE 的这种因果关系可能会受到外周阻力的调节。这些结果强调了 WI 和 HDT 期间心血管调节的差异,并证实格兰杰因果关系可能揭示标准方法无法获得的生理机制。